![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
ups.com... If I hear this ONE more time on Unicom, I'm going to scream! Is it *really* possible that one can be a certificated pilot, and *NOT* know that it's impossible to receive AND transmit at the same time? I've actually wondered about stuck mics. With the thousands of ancient GA aircrafts flying in this country, I would think a mecahnical failure on the PTT switch would not be very unlikely. If somebody's mic gets stuck on a class B frequency (either the pilots fault or the mic breaking), would'nt that be a big problem? How would they even track it? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jacob" wrote in message
. com... I've actually wondered about stuck mics. With the thousands of ancient GA aircrafts flying in this country, I would think a mecahnical failure on the PTT switch would not be very unlikely. It does happen, yes. If somebody's mic gets stuck on a class B frequency (either the pilots fault or the mic breaking), would'nt that be a big problem? How would they even track it? It could be a problem. For the airplane with the stuck mic, it is definitely a problem, since it effectively disables communication for that airplane. For other users of the frequency, it just depends on how close they are to each other and to the airplane with the stuck mic, and of course the relative power of their transmitters. Many of the other users may still be able to communicate with each other, at least in limited fashion, while some may not. I believe this would be a bigger problem at an uncontrolled airport, where the users of the frequency are all very close to each other. In Class B airspace, I can easily imagine situations in which the aircraft with the stuck mic is far enough away from other aircraft that other transmissions can get through to those other aircraft. But yes, even in Class B airspace a stuck mic can be a big problem. I don't know what you mean by "track it"; ATC would probably notice that they were constantly receiving, and so would understand there's a stuck mic out there somewhere. As for identifying the aircraft with the stuck mic, that might be harder. Theoretically, one could use direction finding equipment, but I doubt that's practical in most cases; I think the DF information obtained through the FSS would have to be correlated with radar data somehow, and I don't know how well -- if at all -- those systems are linked. It could come down to old-fashioned process of elimination; figuring out which aircraft can still communicate, and eventually whittling the number of aircraft that can't communicate down to one. Pete |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Duniho wrote:
Theoretically, one could use direction finding equipment, but I doubt that's practical in most cases; I think the DF information obtained through the FSS would have to be correlated with radar data somehow, and I don't know how well -- if at all -- those systems are linked. It could come down to old-fashioned process of elimination; figuring out which aircraft can still communicate, and eventually whittling the number of aircraft that can't communicate down to one. When the local FBO does it, I call them on the phone... So nobody has ever froze and held the button down during a landing? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Duniho wrote:
But yes, even in Class B airspace a stuck mic can be a big problem. I don't know what you mean by "track it"; ATC would probably notice that they were constantly receiving, and so would understand there's a stuck mic out there somewhere. As for identifying the aircraft with the stuck mic, that might be harder. I was departing Teterboro (New Jersey, USA - an extremely busy general aviation airport serving New York City) one busy afternoon when there happened to be a stuck mike on the tower frequency. Fortunately this fact was announced on the ground control frequency so all departing traffic were able to receive the takeoff clearance on that frequency. -- Peter ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jacob wrote:
How would they even track it? With a directional antenna, it wouldn't be hard to track it. I'm not sure what good it would do, unless the plane is on the ground and you can have someone walk up and knock on the window. -- Chris W KE5GIX Gift Giving Made Easy Get the gifts you want & give the gifts they want One stop wish list for any gift, from anywhere, for any occasion! http://thewishzone.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've actually wondered about stuck mics. With the thousands of ancient GA
aircrafts flying in this country, I would think a mecahnical failure on the PTT switch would not be very unlikely. If somebody's mic gets stuck on a class B frequency (either the pilots fault or the mic breaking), would'nt that be a big problem? How would they even track it? Usually, if you're close enough, you will start to hear conversation from inside the plane -- often quite hilarious. I remember one stuck-mike over Grinnell, IA. The guy was flying with two other aircraft, and didn't know his mike was hot. He proceeded to absolutely shred his "buddies" landing technique to his co-pilot, from high above in the pattern, live on 122.8. I'm sure he and his "buddies" weren't so close, after that. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In a previous article, "Jay Honeck" said:
I remember one stuck-mike over Grinnell, IA. The guy was flying with two other aircraft, and didn't know his mike was hot. He proceeded to absolutely shred his "buddies" landing technique to his co-pilot, from high above in the pattern, live on 122.8. I remember a stuck mike on Ottawa Terminal where an obvious instructor type was telling his student "this is unusual, normally this frequency isn't this quiet". And yet they didn't figure it out for the 10 minutes I was on the frequency. -- Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/ ....if Paul's really talking about truly average people, then they'd probably die in either case, because common sense isn't. -- Derick Siddoway |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jacob wrote:
If somebody's mic gets stuck on a class B frequency (either the pilots fault or the mic breaking), would'nt that be a big problem? How would they even track it? Class-B airports have several frequencies. For example, Boston has two approach frequencies (four if you count the high frequency stuff that standard COMs don't use). New York has nine. You're supposed to use one frequency if you're approaching from one arc and another if in a different area, but a pilot who finds one frequency blocked is likely to try another. In addition, most traffic entering a class-B is likely to be on an IFR flight plan and already talking to ATC. Any of these aircraft can be instructed to use an alternate approach frequency instead of the blocked one. The controller would also cut a new ATIS tape and provide the alternate approach frequency on that tape. Aircraft landing at the class-B are told to contact the tower on a frequency assigned by approach. If the tower frequency becomes blocked, approach can simply assign a different frequency and the tower controller can then swicth over. Of course, the guy with the stuck mic is likely to have some problems. He's probably just lost communications in the middle of a class-B. It's also going to be pretty obvious to the controller which plane has the problem when they call him and nothing happens. George Patterson If a tank is out of ammunition, what you have is a sixty ton portable radio. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
MOST traffic?
"George Patterson" wrote in message news:r6Tff.1004$Lw6.943@trndny02... In addition, most traffic entering a class-B is likely to be ..... already talking to ATC. George Patterson If a tank is out of ammunition, what you have is a sixty ton portable radio. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Ware wrote:
MOST traffic? Yes, most will be IFR. George Patterson If a tank is out of ammunition, what you have is a sixty ton portable radio. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RIP Mike Valentine | Mal | Soaring | 0 | December 11th 04 08:27 PM |
Changes in Instrument Proficiency Check Requirements | Richard Kaplan | Instrument Flight Rules | 71 | June 10th 04 08:02 PM |
Why not use the F-22 to replace the F/A-18 and F-14? | Guy Alcala | Military Aviation | 265 | March 7th 04 09:28 AM |
Radio silence, Market Garden and death at Arnhem | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 4 | February 12th 04 12:05 AM |
Use of hand-held GPS on FAA check ride | Barry | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | August 9th 03 09:25 PM |