A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

STC for mogas in O-235



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 22nd 05, 11:43 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default STC for mogas in O-235


Matt wrote:
Hi everyone. I was reading about Petersen's STC to use mogas in the O-235.
Apparently the STC for the O-235 only allows premium (91 octane) to be used.
I would still be reluctant to use premium since it is a "step down" in
octane for the O-235. I would not have a problem if I was flying an O-200
and could "step up" to 87 octane since the engine was originally certified
to run on less.


Aviation fuel is rated with an octane rating that is not the same as
the (R+M/2) automotive octane rating. The traditional aviation rating
was more reliable as a guide with the WWII and 50's airliner operations
that ran such powerplants as the R-2800-CB17 at high BMEP low RPM
schedules. A normally aspirated Lyc or Continental (which would chuck
jugs through the cowling in that regime) is essentially a lightweight
farm tractor engine-it operates in a regime more similar to automotive
engines.

Premium mogas is still much cheaper than 100LL. If I had good
availablity of both fuels I would probably rin a mix of 100LL and
mogas-the effect of the TEL in the avgas will boost the mogas's octane
rating much higher than that of each fuel separately, even with as
little as 10% 100LL.

I have operated autombiles and motorcycles for years on just such a
mixture and still run my high compression BSA on just such sauce. I
know of many others running aircraft engines on this as well with good
results. Unless your STC says the tank has to be cleared of avgas
first, it is obviously legal under the STC and gives the FBO a small
revenue stream keeping him off your ass.

  #2  
Old November 22nd 05, 11:57 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default STC for mogas in O-235

Premium mogas is still much cheaper than 100LL. If I had good
availablity of both fuels I would probably rin a mix of 100LL and
mogas-the effect of the TEL in the avgas will boost the mogas's octane
rating much higher than that of each fuel separately, even with as
little as 10% 100LL.


We used to do that with both O-320s and O-200s, and both gave
trouble on either straight mogas or the mix. Unleaded auto fuel is
significantly different from Avgas, and even getting the lead level up
to 0.5 ml/l with a 75/25 mix (to make it the same as 80 octane), we had
valve sticking problems. The O-200 was particularly troublesome.
Several engine overhaulers told us they had customers who had trouble
with mogas or mixes, and they had seen a bit more valve wear in those
engines.
Apparently unleaded auto fuels are refined differently and have a
significantly different composition that older engines don't like. It's
"drier," as one guy put it. When we went back to straight Avgas the
problems went away.
Lycoming won't warranty their engines if mogas is used in them.

Dan

  #3  
Old November 23rd 05, 12:16 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default STC for mogas in O-235


wrote:
Premium mogas is still much cheaper than 100LL. If I had good
availablity of both fuels I would probably rin a mix of 100LL and
mogas-the effect of the TEL in the avgas will boost the mogas's octane
rating much higher than that of each fuel separately, even with as
little as 10% 100LL.


We used to do that with both O-320s and O-200s, and both gave
trouble on either straight mogas or the mix. Unleaded auto fuel is
significantly different from Avgas, and even getting the lead level up
to 0.5 ml/l with a 75/25 mix (to make it the same as 80 octane), we had
valve sticking problems. The O-200 was particularly troublesome.
Several engine overhaulers told us they had customers who had trouble
with mogas or mixes, and they had seen a bit more valve wear in those
engines.
Apparently unleaded auto fuels are refined differently and have a
significantly different composition that older engines don't like. It's
"drier," as one guy put it. When we went back to straight Avgas the
problems went away.
Lycoming won't warranty their engines if mogas is used in them.


If you want to stay in the air, it's a matter of making the engine fit
the fuel instread of the other way around. All my flying was done on
C-85/95s on mogas with a small amount of Marvel Mystery Oil and AFAIK
they never had problems.

There are airboat and amusement park operators running Lycs and
Continentals on propane, and they aren't seizing valves. There were
wind machine operators in West Coast citrus groves running big surplus
Pratts and Wrights on propane and natural gas too, and they ran for
five or ten times normal TBO and when they did let go it was usually
lower end failure-they'd seize and take the pole with them sometimes.

Dan


  #4  
Old November 23rd 05, 01:44 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default STC for mogas in O-235


wrote in message oups.com...
Premium mogas is still much cheaper than 100LL. If I had good
availablity of both fuels I would probably rin a mix of 100LL and
mogas-the effect of the TEL in the avgas will boost the mogas's octane
rating much higher than that of each fuel separately, even with as
little as 10% 100LL.


We used to do that with both O-320s and O-200s, and both gave
trouble on either straight mogas or the mix. Unleaded auto fuel is
significantly different from Avgas, and even getting the lead level up
to 0.5 ml/l with a 75/25 mix (to make it the same as 80 octane), we had
valve sticking problems. The O-200 was particularly troublesome.
Several engine overhaulers told us they had customers who had trouble
with mogas or mixes, and they had seen a bit more valve wear in those
engines.
Apparently unleaded auto fuels are refined differently and have a
significantly different composition that older engines don't like. It's
"drier," as one guy put it. When we went back to straight Avgas the
problems went away.
Lycoming won't warranty their engines if mogas is used in them.

Dan


No problems at all running the O-300 in the 172 on regular old STC OK 87 octane mogas. Gets a sooty belly though...


  #5  
Old November 23rd 05, 04:46 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default STC for mogas in O-235


wrote in message
oups.com...
Premium mogas is still much cheaper than 100LL. If I had good
availablity of both fuels I would probably rin a mix of 100LL and
mogas-the effect of the TEL in the avgas will boost the mogas's octane
rating much higher than that of each fuel separately, even with as
little as 10% 100LL.


We used to do that with both O-320s and O-200s, and both gave
trouble on either straight mogas or the mix. Unleaded auto fuel is
significantly different from Avgas, and even getting the lead level up
to 0.5 ml/l with a 75/25 mix (to make it the same as 80 octane), we had
valve sticking problems. The O-200 was particularly troublesome.
Several engine overhaulers told us they had customers who had trouble
with mogas or mixes, and they had seen a bit more valve wear in those
engines.
Apparently unleaded auto fuels are refined differently and have a
significantly different composition that older engines don't like. It's
"drier," as one guy put it. When we went back to straight Avgas the
problems went away.
Lycoming won't warranty their engines if mogas is used in them.

Dan


My O-200 runs outstanding on mogas. The less lead the better. The C
series and O-200 were designed to run with 0% lead. Other than the fact
100LL smells better than mogas there is absolutely no reason to use it.




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.