Come fly our unfriendly skies

On 29 Nov 2005 14:48:38 -0800, "george" wrote in
.com::

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/st...ectid=10357510

"Airlines are temporary guardians of unaccompanied minors so we
have preferred seating for them."

Ms Paul said Air New Zealand tried to seat children near a crew
area so crew could keep an eye on them and, when possible,
children were seated next to an empty seat.

"Sometimes this isn't possible, so the preference is to seat a
female passenger next door to an unaccompanied minor."

When the Herald asked her if the airline considered male
passengers to be dangerous to children, Ms Paul replied: "That's
not what I said."


Perhaps the Air New Zealand policy concerning male passengers was an
attempt to shield ANZ from accusations of discrimination against
Catholic priests. :-)

Larry Dighera wrote:
On 29 Nov 2005 14:48:38 -0800, "george" wrote in
.com::

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/st...ectid=10357510

"Airlines are temporary guardians of unaccompanied minors so we
have preferred seating for them."

Ms Paul said Air New Zealand tried to seat children near a crew
area so crew could keep an eye on them and, when possible,
children were seated next to an empty seat.

"Sometimes this isn't possible, so the preference is to seat a
female passenger next door to an unaccompanied minor."

When the Herald asked her if the airline considered male
passengers to be dangerous to children, Ms Paul replied: "That's
not what I said."


Perhaps the Air New Zealand policy concerning male passengers was an
attempt to shield ANZ from accusations of discrimination against
Catholic priests. :-)
Yeah I thought of that.
It was the airlines problem as they booked the pax into that seat and
put the kid next to them...
Some-one suggested packing crates in the unpressurised cargo to solve
the problem

In article .com,
says...


If the guy had been a better negotiator, he could have gotten a business
class seat out of it. If you have to move - move in the right direction!

GF

G Farris wrote:
In article .com,
says...


If the guy had been a better negotiator, he could have gotten a business
class seat out of it. If you have to move - move in the right direction!

The inuendo is that all males flying on Air New Zealand and Qantas are
kiddie fiddlers.
They should have dragged a female out of the $10,000 seat to sit with
the kid in cattle class?
I agree...

george wrote:
G Farris wrote:
In article .com,
says...


If the guy had been a better negotiator, he could have gotten a business
class seat out of it. If you have to move - move in the right direction!

The inuendo is that all males flying on Air New Zealand and Qantas are
kiddie fiddlers.
They should have dragged a female out of the $10,000 seat to sit with
the kid in cattle class?
I agree...

That's because the flight attendent doesn't pass out sheep to the male
passengers.

"Ron Natalie" wrote

That's because the flight attendent doesn't pass out sheep to the male
passengers.

Ohhhh, that's low! g

You did just forget the smiley, right?
--
Jim in NC

Morgans wrote:
That's because the flight attendent doesn't pass out sheep to the male
passengers.

Ohhhh, that's low! g

You did just forget the smiley, right?


He wasn't kidding.



--
Mortimer Schnerd, RN

VE

Ron Natalie wrote:
george wrote:
G Farris wrote:
In article .com,
says...


If the guy had been a better negotiator, he could have gotten a business
class seat out of it. If you have to move - move in the right direction!

The inuendo is that all males flying on Air New Zealand and Qantas are
kiddie fiddlers.
They should have dragged a female out of the $10,000 seat to sit with
the kid in cattle class?
I agree...

That's because the flight attendent doesn't pass out sheep to the male
passengers.

Thats Qantas domestic