![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Earlier, Roger Worden wrote:
Factory labor to assemble new things in an repetitive process is usually less expensive than a craftsman in the field repairing a similar unit... ... or maybe the typical economics don't hold true in this market. The latter, quite definitely. Even in the highest-volume glider "factory," craftsmen doing things onesey-twosey hold the central part of the process. I think that none of the big players make more than a few hundred units a year. That may sound like a lot, but it's a far cry from the tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of units you'd see on a car or motorcycle production line. The bottom line is that even in the factory environment manufacuring glider parts is an expensive proposition. It may be less expensive than field repairs and fabrication, but not by much, and business and transportation expenses more than make up the difference. Yes, it is definitely faster and more efficient to make a canopy and frame assembly in the factory. They have the tools and processes and procedures in place to do it correctly in the fewest possible hours. However, with production rates so low, and with the installed base so small, it simply does not make economic sense for them to dedicate part of their production to spares manufacturing. For a lot of the parts, they'd end up with a lot of expensive shelf space dedicated to expensive spare parts for which there is no definite demand. That makes sense when there are tens of thousands of units with an established history of spares requirements. But with a few hundred units in the field there simply is not enough data to build a realistic model of the spares requirements. Another problem is that, here in the US at least, the factory is a long way away. That means expensive transatlantic shipping of a delicate assembly. Thanks, and best regards to all Bob K. http://www.hpaircraft.com/hp-24 |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Bob Kuykendall wrote: Another problem is that, here in the US at least, the factory is a long way away. That means expensive transatlantic shipping of a delicate assembly. I heard a rumor that some guy is working hard at establishing a "factory" for a sleek-looking glider right here in the US. ;-) The facts so far: I have been amazed at how many "original" parts I have been able to buy for my 30 year old glider (Schreder RS-15) from this same guy! Keep it up, Bob. Regards, -Doug Hoffman |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here is an article I found on how to make the canopy blank yourself:
http://www.sportaviation.org/magazin...mer/canopy.pdf Still, it is a fair amount of effort for one canopy. Tom |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roger,
Tons of good posts here. FWIW, I've done a couple of canopy repair jobs (not complete replacements), and everything mentioned elsewhere holds true: - It's doable if you are average to above-average handy with tools and finishing work. - Figure out how long you think it will take. Then triple that estimate. - It can be very satisfying. - The downside risk is pretty high. I'm probably in the "above average" category in terms of experience working with filler,epoxy, and finish sanding, and I've managed to get results ranging from decent to spectacularly poor. If the canopy is already in pretty bad shape, then attempting a home-grown repair or refurbish may not be such a bad thing. You might learn something, and the worst that happens is you have to get the new canopy after all. Erik Mann (P3) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I manufacture Transparencies for a living.
Mostly windshields for sports cars. There are so many places to screw up that it can be a truly humbling experience. What puzzles me is that most folks give little atention to the canopy as it ages. You can double the life of a canopy by keeping it squeaky clean and polishing the surfaces at least annually. Proper polishing doesn't remove material from the plastic, it removes crap from the plastic. Micromesh is NOT a polishing system it is much too agressive, it is for repair work. Even with normal care, the exterior (interior also) will eventually degrade and start to produce chalk like deposits as the monomers in the plastic sublimate. Once it gets to this state, you basically are on life support. If you have a canopy that is so old it just won't polish well, Micromesh probably won't help as the sublimation is in most cases deeper than the max grind depth of the system. When you get to this place, toss the book aside, and get a bit creative. The object of the game is now to stop sublimation and seal the canopy surface with something you can see thru. Believe it or not, the green can TURTLE WAX will make things a lot better. It will fill the small scratches and surface pores and get you back to a usable canopy surface. The downside is that it stops the canopys ability to breathe and adjust to humidity changes which will cause a higher internal hoop stress load to exist and make the canopy less forgiving to bumps and racking. DON'T do this to a canopy with life left in it, but when the choice is this or a replacement, I like doing this first. I've got some vintage race cars going on 5 or 6 years doing this. They are one step from the grave as far as repairability, but they still work ok enough to use. As far as day to day maintenance, a couple thoughts. First, Plexiglass (PMMA) isn't really a solid. It is an incredibly viscous liquid and is pourous. This means that the stuff it is made of can "evaporate" (sublimate) over time. It also means that stuff you put on it can "go into suspension" inside the plastic. This is why I cringe so bad when I see Lemon Pledge used on a canopy. Not only is the propellant, usually isobutane, (a great solvent I might add) trapped inside the canopy by the wax so it can disolve the internal structure of the plastic, but the free breathing of the plastic and its ability to adjust its relative humidity are compromised. Dust can do the same thing, it will plug the plastic pores and in most cases it is acidic and will react adversely to the plastic. So what to do. Keep a piece of dry flannel on the canopy when you aren't using it. Only use good quality plastic cleaners designed for the plastic you have. Always start a canopy cleaning with clear water to get the dust off the canopy before you start smushing it into the plastic with your cleaning rag. Only use soft cotton to clean the canopy, old diapers are the gold standard. I hope this helps, and no, I'm not looking for canopy work.... Scott. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() pbc76049 (removethis) wrote: I manufacture Transparencies for a living... Spectr Scott, I been trying to get ahold of you. Drop me an email when you can. Thanks, Bob K. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Earlier, Doug Hoffman wrote:
Bob Kuykendall wrote: I heard a rumor that some guy is working hard at establishing a "factory" for a sleek-looking glider right here in the US. ;-) It's been rough going, but we're plugging along! Thanks again, Bob K. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I've replaced a couple of Grob canopies, but it has been over 10 years
ago. Each went like this - Tools - Air powered die grinder with sanding disks and cutoff wheel Screwdriver Foil tape Plastic drill and countersink Small paint gun Day one - With the frame in place on the glider I used the grinder with sanding disk and removed the gel where it contacts the frame. Cut off the remaining canopy next to the frame with a cutoff wheel. (I once saw a Grob mech beat one off with a hammer.) Chiseled and ground off all plastic and the resin used to bond it to the frame. Grob uses small screws to hold it place while the resin cures. Ground those off also. (Approx 4 hours) Day two- The canopy comes oversize. Placed it on the still in place frame and adjusted its position while overlapped and taped in place with clear tape. Ran the cutoff wheel around and used the frame edge as a guide removing all excess. Taped again in place. Drilled and countersinked holes for small brass screws using a drill modified for plastic (careful here or you'll break it). Removed canopy and put a bead of resin on the frame. Pealed back the protective plastic around the edge. Put it back on and lightly (real lightly) screwed it down. (Approx 4 hours) Day three- Masked off at the level of the frame with metal foil tape. Hand sanded the canopy edge to roughen and remove the resin squeeze-out. Filled the gaps and screw heads with white Bondo and block sanded level. Shot on gel coat with a touchup gun. After it cured, sanded and polished the gel. Removed all the tape and protective plastic. Cleaned and waxed it. Signed off the work in the log. (Approx 6 hours) The moral(s) of the story is that it's not a huge task, break it and you'll buy another, and these are hand built aircraft. The frame from one probably won't fit another. Leave the frame in place while you change the glass and it will fit like the original. Most of all, this is how I did it. What you do is at your own risk. ;-) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe you want an awning type thing, we are talking about clear/tinted plastic over the cockpit of an aircraft.
Try another Google search. ;-) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Enroute GPS Install Cost? | Carl Orton | Owning | 3 | May 28th 05 02:26 PM |
Cost to install IFR GPS in a basic IFR 172? | C Kingsbury | Owning | 37 | August 29th 04 02:22 PM |
Duo Discus canopy problems | David Starer | Soaring | 4 | June 20th 04 11:09 PM |
Canopy crack repair | Pete Brown | Soaring | 0 | May 18th 04 03:09 AM |
Redundant canopy latching | John | Soaring | 5 | March 16th 04 12:50 PM |