A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

AOPA flight planner chuckle



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 13th 05, 02:05 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AOPA flight planner chuckle

We just sold a Skyhawk and went to a Warrior, could not imagine
going back...

But, the Skyhawk can be spun for spin training, and probably better
for sight seeing flights.. (pax like to look down)

Probably easier to load pax with limited mobility....

But for a good airplane, the Warrior has more comfort and features
to offer than a Skyhawk (IMHO)

So I would be interested as well, in why you are switching the whole
fleet......

Dave


On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 20:12:44 -0500, vincent p. norris
wrote:

My flying club is undergoing a fleet restructure, replacing Warriors
with Skyhawks.


Mind telling me why, here or by email?

vuince norris


  #2  
Old December 13th 05, 02:23 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AOPA flight planner chuckle

Probably easier to load pax with limited mobility....

From personal experience with my father who was in a wheelchair...
The easiest aircraft to get him in and out of was a Cherokee Six.
With the back door, all I has to do was stand him up and have him sit on
the door sill. Then I just lifted his legs up and turned him to face
forward.
The Cessna's are hard because they are so seat is so high and the
landing gear gets in the way of where they have to stand to position the
pax to get them in.
On a low wing like the Warrior/Archer/Dakota, you can slide them up the
wing and turn the pax to seat them in either the front or back seat.
  #3  
Old December 14th 05, 12:26 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default AOPA flight planner chuckle

Thanks for this John!

Now that I think about it,(and I had not, really) your comments make
sense...

I was thinking of myself having to get in first, rather than helping
the pax get situated and me being the last in...

But the Cessna seat IS a long way up there...

Dave






On Tue, 13 Dec 2005 02:23:32 GMT, john smith wrote:

Probably easier to load pax with limited mobility....


From personal experience with my father who was in a wheelchair...
The easiest aircraft to get him in and out of was a Cherokee Six.
With the back door, all I has to do was stand him up and have him sit on
the door sill. Then I just lifted his legs up and turned him to face
forward.
The Cessna's are hard because they are so seat is so high and the
landing gear gets in the way of where they have to stand to position the
pax to get them in.
On a low wing like the Warrior/Archer/Dakota, you can slide them up the
wing and turn the pax to seat them in either the front or back seat.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CFI without commercial? Jay Honeck Piloting 75 December 8th 10 04:17 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Washington DC airspace closing for good? tony roberts Piloting 153 August 11th 05 12:56 AM
Parachute fails to save SR-22 Capt.Doug Piloting 72 February 10th 05 05:14 AM
NAS and associated computer system Newps Instrument Flight Rules 8 August 12th 04 05:12 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.