![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Newps" wrote in message ... Jay Honeck wrote: (Incidentally, he said that the best thing that EVER happened to their business was everyone running "lean of peak" and driving their EGTs up above 1500 degrees. As temperatures approach 1600 degrees, the metal simply starts to fail, and you end up saving pennies on gas, and blowing dollars on exhaust systems.) Done improperly LOP will start to melt exhaust systems. If you're getting over 1500 EGT then you're not LOP, you're at peak. 75 LOP is the same temp as 75 ROP. The PROPER way is not so much running ROP or LOP but rather the transition from full rich to LOP - it has to be done quickly, like 3-4 seconds ("The Big Pull" as Deakin describes it). Where jus about everyone gets into trouble is running near peak (i.e., just a few degrees either side). Jay is merely parroting the OWT and misinformation that has been running around out there for _years_. -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... Jay is merely parroting the OWT and misinformation that has been running around out there for _years_. Jay quotes an expert in the field and you accuse him of parroting misinformation? LOP is good when properly done, but I think the statement from Dawley says it is NOT being properly done for the most part. The company I work for overhauls 400+ aircraft engines a year. Our teardown shop can tell you which ones have been ran LOP and which have not. Allen |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"A. Smith" wrote in message
. net... "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... Jay is merely parroting the OWT and misinformation that has been running around out there for _years_. Jay quotes an expert in the field and you accuse him of parroting misinformation? And expert on...what? LOP is good when properly done, but I think the statement from Dawley says it is NOT being properly done for the most part. The company I work for overhauls 400+ aircraft engines a year. Our teardown shop can tell you which ones have been ran LOP and which have not. Really? How? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... "A. Smith" wrote in message . net... "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... Jay is merely parroting the OWT and misinformation that has been running around out there for _years_. Jay quotes an expert in the field and you accuse him of parroting misinformation? And expert on...what? An expert on repairing aircraft exhaust. Isn't that what Dawley does? LOP is good when properly done, but I think the statement from Dawley says it is NOT being properly done for the most part. The company I work for overhauls 400+ aircraft engines a year. Our teardown shop can tell you which ones have been ran LOP and which have not. Really? How? I suggest that if you are really interested in this you get with Lycoming or TCM and see what they suggest for your engine. There are only a handful of engines that were designed to be ran LOP. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
A. Smith wrote:
"Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... "A. Smith" wrote in message y.net... "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... Jay is merely parroting the OWT and misinformation that has been running around out there for _years_. Jay quotes an expert in the field and you accuse him of parroting misinformation? And expert on...what? An expert on repairing aircraft exhaust. Isn't that what Dawley does? LOP is good when properly done, but I think the statement from Dawley says it is NOT being properly done for the most part. The company I work for overhauls 400+ aircraft engines a year. Our teardown shop can tell you which ones have been ran LOP and which have not. Really? How? I suggest that if you are really interested in this you get with Lycoming or TCM and see what they suggest for your engine. There are only a handful of engines that were designed to be ran LOP. How do you design an engine to run LOP? Matt |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... How do you design an engine to run LOP? Matt Compression ratio, cumbustion chamber shape, valve placement, valve material, crankshaft counterweight design............................... |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
A. Smith wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... How do you design an engine to run LOP? Matt Compression ratio, cumbustion chamber shape, valve placement, valve material, crankshaft counterweight design............................... Example? Matt |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... A. Smith wrote: Really? How? I suggest that if you are really interested in this you get with Lycoming or TCM and see what they suggest for your engine. There are only a handful of engines that were designed to be ran LOP. How do you design an engine to run LOP? So much for "expertise". -- Matt --------------------- Matthew W. Barrow Site-Fill Homes, LLC. Montrose, CO |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
A. Smith wrote:
"Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... Jay is merely parroting the OWT and misinformation that has been running around out there for _years_. Jay quotes an expert in the field and you accuse him of parroting misinformation? LOP is good when properly done, but I think the statement from Dawley says it is NOT being properly done for the most part. The company I work for overhauls 400+ aircraft engines a year. Our teardown shop can tell you which ones have been ran LOP and which have not. I think the point is that it is the temperatue seen by the exhaust pipe that matters, not whether it is LOP or ROP. And the temps mentioned by Mr. Dawley sound more like runnint at peak, rather than either side. People seem to automatically blame running on the lead side and that simply isn't supported by the data. It is an old wives tale pure and simple. Matt |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message ... A. Smith wrote: "Matt Barrow" wrote in message ... Jay is merely parroting the OWT and misinformation that has been running around out there for _years_. Jay quotes an expert in the field and you accuse him of parroting misinformation? LOP is good when properly done, but I think the statement from Dawley says it is NOT being properly done for the most part. The company I work for overhauls 400+ aircraft engines a year. Our teardown shop can tell you which ones have been ran LOP and which have not. I think the point is that it is the temperatue seen by the exhaust pipe that matters, not whether it is LOP or ROP. And the temps mentioned by Mr. Dawley sound more like runnint at peak, rather than either side. People seem to automatically blame running on the lead side and that simply isn't supported by the data. It is an old wives tale pure and simple. Matt Which is my point, people think they know how to run LOP but actually are running at peak, causing damage. The guy at Dawley didn't say running LOP did the damage, just that when the LOP operation began being pushed is when the damage started showing up. Allen |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 03:26 PM |
| Prairie Aviation Museum PIREP | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 6 | October 19th 05 10:18 PM |
| Atlas Air N-522-MC will be back into LUX. | ellx | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | January 4th 05 08:47 PM |
| General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 11:43 PM |
| Here's the Recompiled List of 82 Aircraft Accessible Aviation Museums! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 18 | January 20th 04 05:02 PM |