![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I just think hanging a prop on a crank directly is a non-starter in
the first place...especially on a crank and case not specifically designed for this in the first palce. Maybe a good redrive and flywheel would be a better way to go? That is my opinion, also. -- I partially agree. I agree that hanging a prop directly on the end of an automotive crank, even if you put it on the flywheel end, is a recipe for a short tbo even at low power and for a high failure rate at high power. (If you only use it to push an airboat around the local swamp, you can keep a couple of bottles of skin-so-soft in your tackle box.) However, switching to a traditional aircraft powerplant may not solve the problem. You really only have the full value of testing, experience, and service history when you mate an unmodified engine to an airworthy propeller with which that engine was certified--and preferrably in a combination used by a large number of aircraft in regular service for a reasonably long time. Remember the crankshaft problems in some of the Cessna 172's soon after the change from the Continental O-300 to the Lycoming O-320. (I think it was an early 160HP version, but have long forgotter the dash number--and the problem was promptly solved.) There have been other "teething" problems as well on various engines... In the special case of a KR-2, which was the subject of at lease two of the Corvair engines torn down and inspected, the plane sits too low to swing a 70+ inch diameter propeller; and IIRC was originally designed for VW engines swnging 52 inch diameter propellers. I have heard that the KR-2S sits enough higher to accept a larger prop, possibly 60 inch diameter. That seems to negate the reduction drives, although a shaft drive, similar to the one Steve Whittman developed for his V8 powered Tailwind, could be interesting. BTW, the plans are still available--I think Aircraft Spruce still sells them. Also, Revmaster (and possibly others) offers an aircraft engine based loosly on the VW dimensions and a Jabiru could work--especially with a 3 blade prop... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch | Paul | Home Built | 0 | October 18th 04 10:14 PM |
P-3C Ditches with Four Engines Out, All Survive! | Scet | Military Aviation | 6 | September 27th 04 01:09 AM |
What if the germans... | Charles Gray | Military Aviation | 119 | January 26th 04 11:20 PM |
Corvair Engine Conversion Breakin Success | Dick | Home Built | 1 | January 11th 04 02:06 PM |
Corvair Conversion | Gig Giacona | Home Built | 17 | October 27th 03 09:43 PM |