![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morgans wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote Are you sure? http://www.photonics.com/dictionary/.../QX/lookup.htm \ Don't confuse the issue with facts! ;-) Drop the d, add a g. I think that was I originally said, earlier. I don't know, now. At any rate, diesel, kerosene and jet A all absorb water, not leaving it in the bottom of the tank, separately. Go with that concept! g True, but that isn't what forms the contrails. The water formed by the combustion process vastly exceeds will little was absorbed into the fuel. That is the concept of importance. :-) Matt |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Matt Whiting" wrote! g True, but that isn't what forms the contrails. The water formed by the combustion process vastly exceeds will little was absorbed into the fuel. That is the concept of importance. :-) chuckle Man, this keeps going round and round. "I" originally said that the fuel absorbs water, but that that is an unimportant part of the contrail contribution. "I" originally said that it is the water produced through the process of combustion, that was responsible for forming the contrail. "I" pointed out that the round engines of the WWII bombers produced a good contrail while burning gas, so that proved that it was combustion making the water vapor. Somewhere along the line, someone got into a discussion, as to if jet AQ would absorb water, or not, and "I" said that it did, but "I" somewhere slipped with the name, as to if it was hydroscopic or hygroscopic. I admit that "I" made that mistake, but still "I" claimed that water absorbed in the fuel is not important, since the trails form from water being formed as the result of the combustion process. I don't expect you, or anyone else to go back and look up what I originally said, as it is not all that important, but if someone does, the proof is there. I hope that this puts to rest "MY" role in the great contrail debate. Case closed? Please? -- Jim in NC |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Matt Whiting wrote: Morgans wrote: "Matt Whiting" wrote Are you sure? http://www.photonics.com/dictionary/.../QX/lookup.htm \ Don't confuse the issue with facts! ;-) Drop the d, add a g. I think that was I originally said, earlier. I don't know, now. At any rate, diesel, kerosene and jet A all absorb water, not leaving it in the bottom of the tank, separately. Go with that concept! g True, but that isn't what forms the contrails. The water formed by the combustion process vastly exceeds will little was absorbed into the fuel. That is the concept of importance. :-) White trails in the sky? Must be cocaine. ROTFLMAO |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
Flying the Santa Fe Trail Story: long | JJS | Piloting | 19 | April 9th 04 02:02 AM |
FS: 1986 "Fighting Jets" Hardcover Edition Book | J.R. Sinclair | Military Aviation | 3 | January 22nd 04 05:01 PM |
FS: 1986 "Fighting Jets" Hardcover Edition Book | J.R. Sinclair | Military Aviation | 0 | December 2nd 03 05:10 AM |
FS: 1986 "Fighting Jets" Hardcover Edition Book | Jim Sinclair | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | September 8th 03 07:43 AM |