A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

New gun



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 23rd 06, 02:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default New gun


"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...
Richard Riley wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 07:03:47 GMT, "kd5sak"
wrote:

:
:"Big John" wrote in message
.. .
: Interesting development in guns.
:
Whether or not MetalStorm is a good concept (and I have doubts)
they've had remarkable success at getting press. I've been seeing
them in the general media for about 2 years, with nothing more than a
few prototypes and a contract for a design study. They all talk about
how it can fire a million rounds a second. They don't follow up with
"for 1/100,00th of a second."


I'm with you. Looks like more smoke than fire at present.

Matt


Would seem to me to have possibilities if clustered and used as a variation
on the principle of the Claymore mine. Would think a Claymore would be more
economical though.

HWB


  #2  
Old January 23rd 06, 08:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default New gun

kd5sak wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

Richard Riley wrote:

On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 07:03:47 GMT, "kd5sak"
wrote:

:
:"Big John" wrote in message
m...
: Interesting development in guns.
:
Whether or not MetalStorm is a good concept (and I have doubts)
they've had remarkable success at getting press. I've been seeing
them in the general media for about 2 years, with nothing more than a
few prototypes and a contract for a design study. They all talk about
how it can fire a million rounds a second. They don't follow up with
"for 1/100,00th of a second."


I'm with you. Looks like more smoke than fire at present.

Matt



Would seem to me to have possibilities if clustered and used as a variation
on the principle of the Claymore mine. Would think a Claymore would be more
economical though.

HWB



a multi-shot claymore?
  #3  
Old January 23rd 06, 10:46 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default New gun


"Richard Lamb" wrote in message
ink.net...
kd5sak wrote:
"Matt Whiting" wrote in message
...

Would seem to me to have possibilities if clustered and used as a
variation
on the principle of the Claymore mine. Would think a Claymore would be
more
economical though.

HWB


a multi-shot claymore?


Think of it as a stacked and sequentially fired series of claymore mines.
Guess if you had
a multibarreled unit set for single shots from each barrel it could be set
up as a trail ambush
and fire multishot bursts across a trail each time it was triggered. Nasty
sounding thing, I think.

HWB


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.