![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm not an owner but I have to say I'm stunned...
Considering how much dinero the state of Arizona wants for me to register earth-bound vehicles, I would have supposed it costs far more to register an aircraft than it would appear it does. Very interesting... Jay Beckman PP-ASEL AZ Cloudbusters Chandler, AZ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Beckman wrote:
Considering how much dinero the state of Arizona wants for me to register earth-bound vehicles, I would have supposed it costs far more to register an aircraft than it would appear it does. Arizona uses the auto registration money to support roads for those autos. How much does Arizona spend on facilities for aircraft? George Patterson Coffee is only a way of stealing time that should by rights belong to your slightly older self. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "George Patterson" wrote in message news:_WrBf.15463$Me5.5086@trnddc05... Jay Beckman wrote: Considering how much dinero the state of Arizona wants for me to register earth-bound vehicles, I would have supposed it costs far more to register an aircraft than it would appear it does. Arizona uses the auto registration money to support roads for those autos. How much does Arizona spend on facilities for aircraft? George Patterson I think Arizona pilots are getting their fare share of Government monies: From: http://www.azdot.gov/aviation/index.asp I found this report on Arizona's five year aviation plan: http://shorterlink.com/?ZIRW7N And then you have this from AOPA's Regional Affairs section: ------- Begin Quote ----- May 27, 2004 - In a textbook example of unified general aviation interests, airports, pilots, and aviation advocates have put two measures on the desk of Gov. Janet Napolitano (D-Ariz.) that should significantly increase state funding for airport safety and capacity improvements and reduce aviation taxes. AOPA Western Regional Representative Stacy Howard and Michael Racy, the Airport Support Network volunteer for Marana Regional Airport and a registered lobbyist who represents the Tucson Airport Authority and Pima County, helped convince lawmakers to use 100% of the state's aviation-related tax and fee revenues to help fix general aviation airports. The two also helped win approval for SB1020, a bill to reduce the state's tax on antique aircraft. During the budget crunch of the past several fiscal years, Arizona had diverted approximately half ($7 million to $8 million annually) of the aviation fuel taxes, aircraft registration fees, and aircraft property taxes the state collects to the general fund. Governor Napolitano this year proposed rededicating all those aviation taxes to help maintain airports - a move strongly supported by AOPA and this week approved by state lawmakers. Howard testified before both legislative chambers supporting SB1020. The measure cuts the tax on an estimated 700 "antique" aircraft from 0.5% of value to a flat $20 annual fee. AOPA members in Arizona played a big role, contacting legislators and convincing them to remove procedural hurdles to the bill's passage. ----- End Quote ----- Jay Beckman PP-ASEL AZ Cloudbusters Chandler, AZ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How many miles of roads does your car use, compared to miles
of runway? -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "Jay Beckman" wrote in message news:QwnBf.11236$jR.2385@fed1read01... | I'm not an owner but I have to say I'm stunned... | | Considering how much dinero the state of Arizona wants for me to register | earth-bound vehicles, I would have supposed it costs far more to register an | aircraft than it would appear it does. | | Very interesting... | | Jay Beckman | PP-ASEL | AZ Cloudbusters | Chandler, AZ | | |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
news:jLvBf.69411$QW2.129@dukeread08... How many miles of roads does your car use, compared to miles of runway? Well, that really wasn't my point... I didn't put a lot of emphasis on it, but what I was getting at was the cost to register versus the cost of the vehicle being registered. Aircraft cost more than cars but (it would seem) cost far less to register on a "per thousand dollars of value" basis. I was mearly expressing a sense of suprise...I'm certainly not advocating that pilots dig deeper than they already have to. And as I said, I'm not an owner so I'm only reacting to the actual numbers being quoted without a complete understanding of additonal taxes and fees that go with buying an owning. Jay B |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jay Beckman" wrote in message
news:_8wBf.11272$jR.8415@fed1read01... "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:jLvBf.69411$QW2.129@dukeread08... How many miles of roads does your car use, compared to miles of runway? Well, that really wasn't my point... I didn't put a lot of emphasis on it, but what I was getting at was the cost to register versus the cost of the vehicle being registered. But your "point" ignored the reality of the situation. At least in some respects, supporting a motor vehicle costs more than supporting an airplane. So why shouldn't the tax on a "per-value" basis be more? I don't think it's legitimate to compare taxes between different kinds of goods and expect them to come out the same on a "per-value" basis. Otherwise, we could just have a single sales/use tax on everything, right? Does it seem odd to you that your home isn't taxed the same rate on a "per-value" basis as your car? That would be just as valid a point as the one you were making in your post. Pete |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
... "Jay Beckman" wrote in message news:_8wBf.11272$jR.8415@fed1read01... "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:jLvBf.69411$QW2.129@dukeread08... How many miles of roads does your car use, compared to miles of runway? Well, that really wasn't my point... I didn't put a lot of emphasis on it, but what I was getting at was the cost to register versus the cost of the vehicle being registered. But your "point" ignored the reality of the situation. At least in some respects, supporting a motor vehicle costs more than supporting an airplane. So why shouldn't the tax on a "per-value" basis be more? Valid point. I don't think it's legitimate to compare taxes between different kinds of goods and expect them to come out the same on a "per-value" basis. Otherwise, we could just have a single sales/use tax on everything, right? Also true. Does it seem odd to you that your home isn't taxed the same rate on a "per-value" basis as your car? That would be just as valid a point as the one you were making in your post. Fair 'nuff. Jay B |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Governments only have a right to tax for services rendered
and only for services actually wanted by the public. Passing a law to require that you use a "service" just so you can tax is an abuse. Unfortunately, governments have the power to tax for whatever they want, whenever they want. As has been said, the power to tax is the power to destroy. Most state aviation departments, if they even have one, do little but duplicate Federal regulations, inspections and controls. Small airports are owned by cities, counties and private individuals [who are taxed very heavily] and few states actually own any airports. Some states do provide real services and the pilots and passengers in those states get a benefit. But many states just tax because they can. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P -- The people think the Constitution protects their rights; But government sees it as an obstacle to be overcome. some support http://www.usdoj.gov/olc/secondamendment2.htm See http://www.fija.org/ more about your rights and duties. "Jay Beckman" wrote in message news:_8wBf.11272$jR.8415@fed1read01... | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | news:jLvBf.69411$QW2.129@dukeread08... | How many miles of roads does your car use, compared to miles | of runway? | | | Well, that really wasn't my point... | | I didn't put a lot of emphasis on it, but what I was getting at was the cost | to register versus the cost of the vehicle being registered. | | Aircraft cost more than cars but (it would seem) cost far less to register | on a "per thousand dollars of value" basis. | | I was mearly expressing a sense of suprise...I'm certainly not advocating | that pilots dig deeper than they already have to. | | And as I said, I'm not an owner so I'm only reacting to the actual numbers | being quoted without a complete understanding of additonal taxes and fees | that go with buying an owning. | | Jay B | | |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Beckman wrote:
I didn't put a lot of emphasis on it, but what I was getting at was the cost to register versus the cost of the vehicle being registered. But you still seem to have missed the point. The major point of license fees is to pay the costs of infrastructure. There's a lot of that with cars, so the registration cost is high. There's comparatively little of that for light aircraft, so the registration fees are low. The fees have nothing to do with the relative values of the aircraft and autos, and shouldn't have. George Patterson Coffee is only a way of stealing time that should by rights belong to your slightly older self. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"George Patterson" wrote in message
news:6XBBf.7851$zh2.3507@trnddc01... Jay Beckman wrote: I didn't put a lot of emphasis on it, but what I was getting at was the cost to register versus the cost of the vehicle being registered. But you still seem to have missed the point. The major point of license fees is to pay the costs of infrastructure. There's a lot of that with cars, so the registration cost is high. There's comparatively little of that for light aircraft, so the registration fees are low. The fees have nothing to do with the relative values of the aircraft and autos, and shouldn't have. George Patterson As it applies in your explaination, I'd have to agree. Now, let me ask this (simply as a point of discussion): Does our use of aviation's "infrastructure" really end when the wheels leave the ground? With the FAA crying poverty and the spectre of "Use Fees" looming over GA, what happens when the argument becomes: Pilots are using an "aviation infrastructure" anytime we're flying in the National Airspace System." - IFR flying? - VFR pilots requesting flight following? - Operations at Towered airports? - Class B, C or D transitions? - FSS? - Flight Watch? Are we ever truly free of, or without need of, the GA "infrastructure?" Your thoughts? Jay B |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 1 | January 2nd 04 09:02 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | October 2nd 03 03:07 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 4 | August 7th 03 05:12 AM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |