![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm reading the FAA CD for a Tcraft.
I see in '90 that it sustained substantial damage, was deregistered as 'totally distroyed', then sold. Apparently someone resurrected it, because it was sold several years later using the same N number and it's currently flying in Florida. The CD (BTW) doesn't show any of what must have been major major work performing this resurrection (my only reference is the CD; I haven't seen the logs yet) There doesn't seem to be the audit trail I'd like; I see a stream of ownership, but although there is a document saying 'please deregister this aircraft' there is nothing saying 'pick me back up'. Should I be concerned? - Mike |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would be very concerned... it appears as if the aircraft may be flying
with an expired / unregistered n-number. Also, if someone put it back together, they did not re-register or realize it was deregistered. BT "Michael Horowitz" wrote in message ... I'm reading the FAA CD for a Tcraft. I see in '90 that it sustained substantial damage, was deregistered as 'totally distroyed', then sold. Apparently someone resurrected it, because it was sold several years later using the same N number and it's currently flying in Florida. The CD (BTW) doesn't show any of what must have been major major work performing this resurrection (my only reference is the CD; I haven't seen the logs yet) There doesn't seem to be the audit trail I'd like; I see a stream of ownership, but although there is a document saying 'please deregister this aircraft' there is nothing saying 'pick me back up'. Should I be concerned? - Mike |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Best way to check is with a title search? - Mike
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:24:53 -0800, "BTIZ" wrote: I would be very concerned... it appears as if the aircraft may be flying with an expired / unregistered n-number. Also, if someone put it back together, they did not re-register or realize it was deregistered. BT "Michael Horowitz" wrote in message .. . I'm reading the FAA CD for a Tcraft. I see in '90 that it sustained substantial damage, was deregistered as 'totally distroyed', then sold. Apparently someone resurrected it, because it was sold several years later using the same N number and it's currently flying in Florida. The CD (BTW) doesn't show any of what must have been major major work performing this resurrection (my only reference is the CD; I haven't seen the logs yet) There doesn't seem to be the audit trail I'd like; I see a stream of ownership, but although there is a document saying 'please deregister this aircraft' there is nothing saying 'pick me back up'. Should I be concerned? - Mike |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Horowitz wrote:
I'm reading the FAA CD for a Tcraft. I see in '90 that it sustained substantial damage, was deregistered as 'totally distroyed', then sold. Apparently someone resurrected it, because it was sold several years later using the same N number and it's currently flying in Florida. The CD (BTW) doesn't show any of what must have been major major work performing this resurrection (my only reference is the CD; I haven't seen the logs yet) There doesn't seem to be the audit trail I'd like; I see a stream of ownership, but although there is a document saying 'please deregister this aircraft' there is nothing saying 'pick me back up'. Should I be concerned? - Mike Check the FAA registration database at: http://registry.faa.gov/aircraftinquiry/defimg.asp If it shows up there, it is registered. It is not uncommon for an aircraft to be declared destroyed, "unregistered", and then reregistered to "clean the slate" as it were after banks fail to clear liens and the like. In many cases, the aircraft was not even damaged; it's just a paperwork shortcut around bureacracy. Good luck, Rip |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's a Taylorcraft. It was wrecked and somebody built a new one. With
a tube and fabric airplane this is normal. All you need out of the wreck is the data plate. Everything else can be bought new. Michael Horowitz wrote: I'm reading the FAA CD for a Tcraft. I see in '90 that it sustained substantial damage, was deregistered as 'totally distroyed', then sold. Apparently someone resurrected it, because it was sold several years later using the same N number and it's currently flying in Florida. The CD (BTW) doesn't show any of what must have been major major work performing this resurrection (my only reference is the CD; I haven't seen the logs yet) There doesn't seem to be the audit trail I'd like; I see a stream of ownership, but although there is a document saying 'please deregister this aircraft' there is nothing saying 'pick me back up'. Should I be concerned? - Mike |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
true... but the documentation needs to keep up with the airframe..
same SerNum, Same N# and FAA records said it was a total nothing in his "CD" that shows any work done to resurrect the aircraft. There was the same problem with a CAP L-23. Damaged in a wind storm in Texas, taken to a military Depot in Amarillo and left there. Registration turned in to FAA as "damaged beyond repair". Then it gets resurrected, parts rebuilt, and starts flying, without a valid certificate of airworthiness, it was recorded in the FAA records as destroyed aircraft, and the N number was "cancelled", luckily it was not reissued to another aircraft. It took nearly a year for the CAP lawyers to figure it out and get everything back in proper record with the FAA before the CAP could legally fly it again. BT "Newps" wrote in message . .. It's a Taylorcraft. It was wrecked and somebody built a new one. With a tube and fabric airplane this is normal. All you need out of the wreck is the data plate. Everything else can be bought new. Michael Horowitz wrote: I'm reading the FAA CD for a Tcraft. I see in '90 that it sustained substantial damage, was deregistered as 'totally distroyed', then sold. Apparently someone resurrected it, because it was sold several years later using the same N number and it's currently flying in Florida. The CD (BTW) doesn't show any of what must have been major major work performing this resurrection (my only reference is the CD; I haven't seen the logs yet) There doesn't seem to be the audit trail I'd like; I see a stream of ownership, but although there is a document saying 'please deregister this aircraft' there is nothing saying 'pick me back up'. Should I be concerned? - Mike |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do I understand you correctly that if he has a valid airwortiness
certificate we're good to go? What makes it a valid certification? He could be waving the old one (pre reserection) for all I know - Mike |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You think the Feds records are in order? What planet are you on?
Send a letter to FAA Oklahoma and ask some direct questions. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
GPT (Gulfport MS) ILS 14 question | A Lieberman | Instrument Flight Rules | 18 | January 30th 05 04:51 PM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
A question on Airworthiness Inspection | Dave S | Home Built | 1 | August 10th 04 05:07 AM |
T Tail question | Paul Austin | Military Aviation | 7 | September 23rd 03 06:05 PM |