![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can do the 150-160 upgrade during a top overhaul. It doesn't involve the
bottom. "Bob Noel" wrote in message ... In article , wrote: [snip] Anyway, my question to the other airplane owners out there -- which of the three options A, B, or C would you choose? In generally, my philosophy has been to avoid using "used" parts when at all possible, but of course these are very expensive parts. Unfortunately I have no budget saved up for this, so cost is a major factor to me. how much time on each cylinder? (if you have a 150hp cherokee, then I'd overhaul the engine and upgrade it to 160hp). I personally would opt for new cylinders. I'm probably looking at owning the airplane for another 400-500 hours maximum. Thus when I go to sell, the ad would read something like "1250 SMOH 400 STOH". Is the top-overhaul a selling point? Is the buyer going to care significantly whether I use new cylinders or used/reconditioned? To me, "STOH" is completely meaningless. 1250 SMOH would be the driving factor. However, I would be very doubtful of used/reconditioned cylinders. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bad cylinder | Denny | Owning | 17 | September 12th 05 06:04 PM |
Path of an airplane in a 1G roll | Chris W | Piloting | 47 | July 4th 05 10:53 PM |
Path of an airplane in a 1G roll | Chris W | Aerobatics | 20 | June 29th 05 09:35 AM |
Path of an airplane in a 1G roll | Chris W | Home Built | 22 | June 29th 05 09:35 AM |
Start Anywhere Cylinder (SSA rules proposal) | Mark Navarre | Soaring | 15 | September 25th 03 01:13 PM |