![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ok, maybe not automatic, but it shouldn't take couple of years to
approve a fix to prevent a rudder from falling off, and then only notify owners of certified gliders, as if identical glider which was not certified but is legal to fly can continue fly safely without the fix... Ramy |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ramy wrote:
ok, maybe not automatic, but it shouldn't take couple of years to approve a fix to prevent a rudder from falling off, and then only notify owners of certified gliders, as if identical glider which was not certified but is legal to fly can continue fly safely without the fix... Actually, the AD came out rather quickly (only a year!), given the time frames the FAA normally operates with. In this case, there are 1000+ aircraft covered by the TN, ranging in age up to 30 years, but likely only one or two actual instances of failure, none of which apparently happened in flight. I think they got the trade-offs right. With a potentially serious safety problem, the FAA will simply ground all of the aircraft immediately (as they did with the Duos), then sort out the paperwork and repair issues with the manufacturer at a (slightly) accelerated pace. I wouldn't consider that a desirable approach for this rudder mounting problem. If one owns a glider with a special airworthiness certificate, one assumes responsibility to check with the manufacturer for relevant technical notes and service bulletins, as is clearly spelled out in the operating limitations. If one wants the FAA to monitor these things, one should buy a type certificated glider... Marc |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a 300 owner, I received a written notification from the FAA about a
year ago called a "Special Information Bulletin" that directed me to the DG TN. So, although they did not issue an AD for 300's, they do have a system in place to notify registered non type certificated owners. I'm happy not to have the FAA any more involved in the operation of my glider. Especially in the case of DG, it is very easy to go online to check the current TN list for any model. John If one owns a glider with a special airworthiness certificate, one assumes responsibility to check with the manufacturer for relevant technical notes and service bulletins, as is clearly spelled out in the operating limitations. If one wants the FAA to monitor these things, one should buy a type certificated glider... Marc |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FAA Advice request: Plus a GlaStar note | Tim Hickey | Home Built | 1 | April 4th 05 01:38 PM |
Why was the Fokker D VII A Good Plane? | Matthew G. Saroff | Military Aviation | 111 | May 4th 04 05:34 PM |
Note from a Sick Puppy | Veeduber | Home Built | 4 | March 21st 04 10:43 PM |
A note to Roger Halstead | The Boz | Simulators | 1 | January 9th 04 02:23 AM |
Duo Discus Tech note | Thomas Knauff | Soaring | 25 | August 9th 03 10:10 PM |