A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

DG AD NOTE



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old February 15th 06, 07:14 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default DG AD NOTE

ok, maybe not automatic, but it shouldn't take couple of years to
approve a fix to prevent a rudder from falling off, and then only
notify owners of certified gliders, as if identical glider which was
not certified but is legal to fly can continue fly safely without the
fix...

Ramy

  #12  
Old February 15th 06, 07:38 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default DG AD NOTE

Ramy wrote:
ok, maybe not automatic, but it shouldn't take couple of years to
approve a fix to prevent a rudder from falling off, and then only
notify owners of certified gliders, as if identical glider which was
not certified but is legal to fly can continue fly safely without the
fix...


Actually, the AD came out rather quickly (only a year!), given the time
frames the FAA normally operates with. In this case, there are 1000+
aircraft covered by the TN, ranging in age up to 30 years, but likely
only one or two actual instances of failure, none of which apparently
happened in flight. I think they got the trade-offs right.

With a potentially serious safety problem, the FAA will simply ground
all of the aircraft immediately (as they did with the Duos), then sort
out the paperwork and repair issues with the manufacturer at a
(slightly) accelerated pace. I wouldn't consider that a desirable
approach for this rudder mounting problem.

If one owns a glider with a special airworthiness certificate, one
assumes responsibility to check with the manufacturer for relevant
technical notes and service bulletins, as is clearly spelled out in the
operating limitations. If one wants the FAA to monitor these things,
one should buy a type certificated glider...

Marc
  #13  
Old February 15th 06, 08:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default DG AD NOTE

As a 300 owner, I received a written notification from the FAA about a
year ago called a "Special Information Bulletin" that directed me to
the DG TN. So, although they did not issue an AD for 300's, they do
have a system in place to notify registered non type certificated
owners. I'm happy not to have the FAA any more involved in the
operation of my glider. Especially in the case of DG, it is very easy
to go online to check the current TN list for any model.

John


If one owns a glider with a special airworthiness certificate, one
assumes responsibility to check with the manufacturer for relevant
technical notes and service bulletins, as is clearly spelled out in the
operating limitations. If one wants the FAA to monitor these things,
one should buy a type certificated glider...

Marc


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FAA Advice request: Plus a GlaStar note Tim Hickey Home Built 1 April 4th 05 01:38 PM
Why was the Fokker D VII A Good Plane? Matthew G. Saroff Military Aviation 111 May 4th 04 05:34 PM
Note from a Sick Puppy Veeduber Home Built 4 March 21st 04 10:43 PM
A note to Roger Halstead The Boz Simulators 1 January 9th 04 02:23 AM
Duo Discus Tech note Thomas Knauff Soaring 25 August 9th 03 10:10 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:38 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.