Physics Professor's Peer Reviewed Paper on WTC CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS on 9/11

"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote in
:


"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
Jim Logajan wrote in
:

TRUTH wrote:
Yes, hius paper was peer reviewed.

By what journal?



Okay, if you mean peer reviewed in that sense, it was not as of yet.
According to BYU's website, it has not been properly submitted yet.
But once enought people can't on, it defintely will be. The 9/11
Truth Movement
has been growing very rapidy. Especially the past 6 months or so,
with all the evidence and prominent people speaking up


Oh so now the TRUTH comes out. Peer reviewed means journal, EVERYONE
knows this so take your meds and quit posting this **** in our nice
little news group where we talk about small little airplanes.

--------------------------------------------
DW






Okay, so I make a little mistake and since you're so closed minded, you
think that negates all the scientific facts. LOL

In article ,
TRUTH wrote:

Okay, so I make a little mistake

....like claiming a paper is peer reviewed, like claiming pretty much
everything you've said in this thread (including screwing up the title
of the thread itself)?

Chad Irby wrote in news:cirby-82BB57.22102722022006
@news-server1.tampabay.rr.com:

In article ,
TRUTH wrote:

Okay, so I make a little mistake

...like claiming a paper is peer reviewed, like claiming pretty much
everything you've said in this thread (including screwing up the title
of the thread itself)?




How about reading the paper for yourself?

In article ,
TRUTH wrote:

Chad Irby wrote in news:cirby-82BB57.22102722022006
@news-server1.tampabay.rr.com:

In article ,
TRUTH wrote:

Okay, so I make a little mistake

...like claiming a paper is peer reviewed, like claiming pretty much
everything you've said in this thread (including screwing up the title
of the thread itself)?

How about reading the paper for yourself?

I did. He's full of ****.

And (here's the kicker) I really understand his claims, which you don't.

Chad Irby wrote in
:

In article ,
TRUTH wrote:

Chad Irby wrote in
news:cirby-82BB57.22102722022006 @news-server1.tampabay.rr.com:

In article ,
TRUTH wrote:

Okay, so I make a little mistake

...like claiming a paper is peer reviewed, like claiming pretty
much everything you've said in this thread (including screwing up
the title of the thread itself)?

How about reading the paper for yourself?

I did. He's full of ****.

And (here's the kicker) I really understand his claims, which you
don't.



Fine, prove it. Debunk his paper and explain WHY his evidence does not
apply. And be specific. No silly childish nonsense