A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Narrowing it down... Comanche?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old February 23rd 06, 05:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Narrowing it down... Comanche?

"Ken Reed" wrote in message
nk.net...
The legroom fits with what I've read--but, otherwise, you're the first
source who *doesn't* say the Mooney is "a tight fit," "like getting into
a sports car," "you wear it," etc. M20s have a 43" cabin width from what
I've read--compare to 45" for the Comanche. Are my figures off??


This from an AOPA article:
"Although the measuring tape says the cabin is comparable to other
four-place retractables, the perception is that the cockpit is not as
large."

The Mooney is 43.5"and the Comanche is 44", according to Plane & Pilot:

http://www.planeandpilotmag.com/cont..._tse_1988.html

http://www.planeandpilotmag.com/cont...rcomanche.html

0.5" difference doesn't get me too excited.


Nor me. (Though, I should note, the P&P site lists the Comanche at the 45"
I'd seen, on both links for a 250; the specs for the 180 show 44"--I thought
they used the same airframe??) I wonder if the difference is related to
shape? Is the Mooney more rounded, perhaps, leading to less shoulder room
than the 43.5" would otherwise indicate? In any case, I've yet to sit in a
Comanche, and it's been many years since I've been in a Mooney (and, at the
time, I was used to flying the AA-5, so I doubt I would've complained then!)
Either way, that "perception" the AOPA article mentions leads me to think
there's something to it....


..

If you decide to look into Mooneys further, you may want to consider an
'F' model versus a 'J' (aka 201). The 'J' is a great airplane too, but it
may be more than you need. Your 150 MPH cruise figure is slow for any
Mooney; the 'F' will cruise at 145-150 kts and the 'J' will do 158-160 kts
(real world numbers). If you are looking for 600sm range, in a Mooney you
don't need four hours ;-)


Oh, absolutely! Of course, 150 mph is slow for the Comanche, too--those
were minimum figures. The M20F's number seem to be comparable to the
PA-24-2xx's (and the J is faster). Factor in the intangibles, though, and
the Mooneys stay on the back burner for now--great airplanes that will meet
my needs, but not (in my impression) the best choice for my needs/wants
right now....

(FYI, before I "discovered" the Comanches in my research, Mooney was leading
the pack....)

Thanks for the advice!

--
Doug
"Where am I to go/Now that I've gone too far?" -- Golden Earring, "Twilight
Zone"
(my email is spam-proofed; read the address and make the appropriate change
to contact me)



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comanche accident averted last evening [email protected] Piloting 23 April 13th 05 10:02 AM
Future Home of Comanche prototype #1 Dan & Jan Hollenbaugh Military Aviation 1 August 13th 04 05:37 AM
Comanche Aircraft headed to museums Dan & Jan Hollenbaugh Military Aviation 0 June 11th 04 01:32 PM
Comanche 260 - 1965 Sami Saydjari Owning 5 December 8th 03 12:24 AM
RAH-66 Comanche helicopter could face budget cuts in 2005 Larry Dighera Military Aviation 0 November 19th 03 02:18 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.