![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Sarangan wrote:
Hello It was my impression that mounting the LED directly to the reflector (flashing aluminum) will not provide enough heat sinking. A large surface area is not the only determining factor because the thermal conductivity of the metal will limit how far the heat can spread. The thinner the metal, the worse the thermal conductivity. Flashing aluminum is only 1/100" thick so its conductivity is not very high. One could construct fins on the back side to increase the surface area, but commercial heat sinks do that much better. I think you have a beautiful design with good tradeoffs, Andrew. However, if one were inclined to go fanless, there are heatsinks now that are much lighter will provide much greater surface area. It uses a much greater number of fins, and each is very thin. -- This is by far the hardest lesson about freedom. It goes against instinct, and morality, to just sit back and watch people make mistakes. We want to help them, which means control them and their decisions, but in doing so we actually hurt them (and ourselves)." |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 05 Mar 2006 05:16:51 GMT, Ernest Christley
wrote: Andrew Sarangan wrote: Hello It was my impression that mounting the LED directly to the reflector (flashing aluminum) will not provide enough heat sinking. A large surface area is not the only determining factor because the thermal conductivity of the metal will limit how far the heat can spread. The thinner the metal, the worse the thermal conductivity. Flashing aluminum is only 1/100" thick so its conductivity is not very high. One could construct fins on the back side to increase the surface area, but commercial heat sinks do that much better. I think you have a beautiful design with good tradeoffs, Andrew. However, if one were inclined to go fanless, there are heatsinks now that are much lighter will provide much greater surface area. It uses a much greater number of fins, and each is very thin. Ernest, it takes cross sectional area to conduct heat; if you look at the TRULY designed heatsinks to maximize heat transfer to air, you will note a tapered base with tapered fins, larger and thicker fins close, smaller and thinner further away. I am weak in describing this, but I think you will get the picture; think about holding a piece of aluminum foil 2 inches long in a candle flame, then a piece of 1/4" aluminum rod in the same flame. Your fingers won't get warm with the foil, but will burn with the rod. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For some reason I thought you'd mentioned that it was .1". If its that
thin (.01") you might need to either use thicker stock or epoxy (with special high heat transfer epoxy) that heat sink behind the LED. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
More LED's | Veeduber | Home Built | 19 | June 9th 04 10:07 PM |
Panel Lights - Need Help | Barnyard BOb - | Home Built | 2 | May 29th 04 07:51 PM |
Building chasing airport lights -- Attn: Jim Weir? | Jay Honeck | Owning | 79 | February 29th 04 02:10 PM |
LEDs for Nav Lights - Jim Weir | Scott Gettings | Home Built | 3 | February 17th 04 01:53 AM |
LEDs with Strobe lights | pekka1510 | Home Built | 11 | August 31st 03 11:36 PM |