![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Seen in Avweb's AvFlash:
[begin quote] CRASH STATISTICS, FROM THE ASSOCIATED PRESS According to the AP's research, pilots older than 50 were involved in 55.8 percent of accidents over a five-year period even though they constitute only 36.8 percent of certificated pilots. And, apparently, the older a pilot gets, the greater the risk. Pilots between the ages of 50 and 59 had 26.4 percent of accidents, marginally higher than their percentage of the pilot population, which is about 22.1 percent, but those 60 and older had 23.6 percent of accidents even though they make up only 14.7 percent of certificated pilots. The research also determined that those under 50 consistently had proportionately fewer accidents throughout the five-year sample period. More... [end quote] The main article goes on to say that pretty much anything other than age was not factored into the report. I'm just wondering - yet another questionable analysis? (I have no axe to grind, it's still a couple of decades until I'm considered 'an older pilot') In particular: - In the set of pilots between 20 and 50, perhaps a larger proportion of those pilots are professional pilots flying for the airlines, where the accident rates are lower and 2-pilot crews are the norm. - In the set of pilots aged 50 and over, perhaps many more flight hours are being flown by this group in GA aircraft because (a) they have the time and (b) they are more likely to have the money - since their time and money are less likely to be soaked up by child-rearing. - as AvWeb pointed out, perhaps older GA pilots (generally having more money) are flying faster machinery that is more likely to result in a fatality when the angle of arrival is too steep. I'd like to see it normalised particularly for flight hours and limited to GA pilots only before I could draw any conclusions at all for a study such as this. I don't think it carries much weight at all. -- Dylan Smith, Port St Mary, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd like to see it normalised particularly for flight hours and limited
to GA pilots only before I could draw any conclusions at all for a study such as this. I don't think it carries much weight at all. Agreed -- but the general public won't see it that way. All they'll retain is "old pilots crash", and move on to the NCAA tourney headlines... I find it appalling that the average age of pilots is now 47 -- my age! Man, if that's not an indication of the relative health (or, rather, the lack thereof) of General Aviation, I'm not sure what is. We need to get a few hundred thousand 20-something-year-olds in the fold to ensure that GA (as we know it) is around in another 20 years. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Dylan Smith wrote: I'd like to see it normalised particularly for flight hours and limited to GA pilots only bingo! before I could draw any conclusions at all for a study such as this. I don't think it carries much weight at all. Before anyone can draw a VALID conclusion. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Dylan Smith wrote: - In the set of pilots aged 50 and over, perhaps many more flight hours are being flown by this group in GA aircraft because (a) they have the time and (b) they are more likely to have the money - since their time and money are less likely to be soaked up by child-rearing. I think that pretty much explains it. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:WFyTf.39506$oL.27969@attbi_s71... snip I find it appalling that the average age of pilots is now 47 -- my age! Man, if that's not an indication of the relative health (or, rather, the lack thereof) of General Aviation, I'm not sure what is. We need to get a few hundred thousand 20-something-year-olds in the fold to ensure that GA (as we know it) is around in another 20 years. -- Jay Honeck You're absolutely right about getting the younger crowd to participate in Aviation. If you think flying is expensive now, wait until all those "old farts" retire and FBO's, airframe manufacturers, etc. have to spread their costs out over even fewer units. A $15,000 engine rebuild will seem like a real bargain then. Unfortunately, the FBO's I see are being used as corporate pilot training centers, where the CFI's are all 25 and are motivated to build hours so they can get a job with a commuter airline. In addtion to the lack of continuity with the instructors (most don't last 6 months before they move to something bigger and better), the FBO's seem to have a very short term horizon. Instead of working to minimize the cost of getting a pilot's license so they will have more customers over the long term, our local FBO's charge steep prices for PPSEL training and C-152 rentals. In the end, the 22 year old who is interested in flying makes a visit to the FBO, "does the math", and realizes that a PPSEL is out of financial reach. S/he never comes back. It seems that the GA "industry" would realize that the key to the industry's long term health is creating enough pilots so the industry is sustainable over the long term. Your local GA field is going to be a far different place in 20 years unless something changes. KB |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:32:57 -0500, "Kyle Boatright"
wrote in :: You're absolutely right about getting the younger crowd to participate in Aviation. [...] In the end, the 22 year old who is interested in flying makes a visit to the FBO, "does the math", and realizes that a PPSEL is out of financial reach. S/he never comes back. That's because wealth is usually acquired later in life. Today the ultralight and powered parachute equipment provides the aviation minded youth the means of flight without benefit of examination nor unrealistic cost. Later, when s/he can better afford the expense, the option is always open for flight instruction and FAA certificate. So, if you're truly interested in swelling the ranks of airmen, consider soliciting recruits with advertising targeted to them in publications that serve the ultralight segment of aviation. [...] Your local GA field is going to be a far different place in 20 years unless something changes. If SATS is eventually implemented nationwide, the municipal airports will become an integral part of airline transportation feeding passengers into international hubs, instead of exclusively serving training and recreational flying. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If SATS is eventually implemented nationwide, the municipal airports
will become an integral part of airline transportation feeding passengers into international hubs, instead of exclusively serving training and recreational flying. That won't happen without a re-thinking of "airline security". That re-thinking could go either way, but given the path of money, I wouldn't bet on our way. Jose -- Nothing takes longer than a shortcut. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The majority of airplane owners on my field are 50 and older... I
suspect the statistics that were quoted at the start of this thread could be revisited... Let me predict that airplane owners over age 50 have a lower rate of accidents than airplane owners under 50... That airplane renters over 50 have a higher rate of accident than airplane renters under 50... That the slight difference in rate versus total percentage of pilots is actually meaningless, just statistical white noise... (Uuhhh, is it politically correct to use the term, "white" noise?) Well, anyway, each pilot is an accident waiting to happen in his own way, not a statistical average... We have a brand new Private rating on our field as of Saturday the 18th... He is young, aggressive, a high earning professional (yuppie), he immediately bought an airplane which will be delivered in a week or so.. He is talking about getting his instrument rating right at the minimum hours allowed... If he survives his next 3 years he will make a fine pilot - that's if he survives... Anyway, it's time for my Geritol and the nurse wants me to take my nap... see ya later.. denny - btw, it is snowing as I toddle off for my nap.. denny |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
denny - btw, it is snowing as I toddle off for my nap..
Same here. Welcome to spring! :-) -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Denny" wrote)
denny - btw, it is snowing as I toddle off for my nap.. We got our 15 to 25 inches last week - Mon and Thur. Our backyard total was 17 inches. Right now it's 25 degrees ...(F) ...NOT ...(C)!!! I think the (high) sun is winning and the snow is actually melting ....slowly. Montblacktop-driveway-is-dry (EVERYTHING else is still white here in the Twin Cities) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ice meteors, climate, sceptics | Brian Sandle | General Aviation | 43 | February 24th 04 12:27 AM |