![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Kyle Boatright wrote:
I simply don't see young people (30) at the airport, unless they are young CFI's or guys making $8/hr driving the fuel truck. well, the money issue has already been discussed, but there is another issue that might drive said young crowd away from GA, even the wealthy kids, and that I don't think you can really fix: GA is not for the 'instant gratification' crowd; the learning process is long and takes a certain amount of dedication that today's youger ones are not ready to undertake, even those who could easily afford it (I live in the Silicon Valley, there are plenty of rich 20 something -- you see them sometimes poping up at the local airport, ask a few questions, may be take a ride, but rarely coming back); there are so many other avenues (sport cars/bikes, 'extreme' sports, the kind you see on mtv, etc.) that makes it possible for them to get instant gratification and show off with a limited amount of personal investment/learning (as compared to what's required for GA), that it is difficult for GA to compete... --Sylvain |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Sylvain" wrote in message t... Kyle Boatright wrote: I simply don't see young people (30) at the airport, unless they are young CFI's or guys making $8/hr driving the fuel truck. well, the money issue has already been discussed, but there is another issue that might drive said young crowd away from GA, even the wealthy kids, and that I don't think you can really fix: GA is not for the 'instant gratification' crowd; the learning process is long and takes a certain amount of dedication that today's youger ones are not ready to undertake, even those who could easily afford it (I live in the Silicon Valley, there are plenty of rich 20 something -- you see them sometimes poping up at the local airport, ask a few questions, may be take a ride, but rarely coming back); there are so many other avenues (sport cars/bikes, 'extreme' sports, the kind you see on mtv, etc.) that makes it possible for them to get instant gratification and show off with a limited amount of personal investment/learning (as compared to what's required for GA), that it is difficult for GA to compete... --Sylvain Instant gratification may be part of it, but from Lindy's flight until the end of the Apollo program, I'd say flying was seen as a true adventure with some glamour thrown in. I believe that brought in a lot of paying customers. In today's world, the primary attention flying gets in the media is when someone crashes or in telling the tale of how horrible commercial air travel has become. The glamour factor is zero. KB |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Kyle Boatright" wrote in message ... "Sylvain" wrote in message t... Kyle Boatright wrote: I simply don't see young people (30) at the airport, unless they are young CFI's or guys making $8/hr driving the fuel truck. well, the money issue has already been discussed, but there is another issue that might drive said young crowd away from GA, even the wealthy kids, and that I don't think you can really fix: GA is not for the 'instant gratification' crowd; the learning process is long and takes a certain amount of dedication that today's youger ones are not ready to undertake, even those who could easily afford it (I live in the Silicon Valley, there are plenty of rich 20 something -- you see them sometimes poping up at the local airport, ask a few questions, may be take a ride, but rarely coming back); there are so many other avenues (sport cars/bikes, 'extreme' sports, the kind you see on mtv, etc.) that makes it possible for them to get instant gratification and show off with a limited amount of personal investment/learning (as compared to what's required for GA), that it is difficult for GA to compete... --Sylvain Instant gratification may be part of it, but from Lindy's flight until the end of the Apollo program, I'd say flying was seen as a true adventure with some glamour thrown in. I believe that brought in a lot of paying customers. In today's world, the primary attention flying gets in the media is when someone crashes or in telling the tale of how horrible commercial air travel has become. The glamour factor is zero. KB It is also pretty boring without much in the way of destinations other than a bad hamburger. Most airports are about as exciting as a morgue at 2:00 am. If there is no social activity it is pretty difficult to get new blood excited. |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article ,
"Dave Stadt" wrote: It is also pretty boring without much in the way of destinations other than a bad hamburger. huh? I guess pilots can be grouped into two groups: one group that loves to fly, the destination is completely unimportant, the other group doesn't understand the love of flying. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bob Noel" wrote in message ... In article , "Dave Stadt" wrote: It is also pretty boring without much in the way of destinations other than a bad hamburger. huh? I guess pilots can be grouped into two groups: one group that loves to fly, the destination is completely unimportant, the other group doesn't understand the love of flying. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate It doesn't take long for most people to get bored going up and just boring holes in the sky. Might be OK for those that only fly 20 hours a year but I doubt there are many that fly 100+ hours a year just to see the same scenery flight, after flight, after flight. I have seen many lose interest not long after passing the check ride due to boredom. Seems to me one way to increase interest is to develop destinations and groups to sponsor fly-outs and other activities. The late 40s, 50s and 60s saw a lot of this type of activity, a healthy GA and lotsa airport activity. For the most part that is not so today. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
The other issue to think about is that it seems that huge numbers of
people millions can find the money in the household budget for boats... And if you think that flying bends the budget, hang around the local marina and go to a few boat shows... The crowds slobbering over $15,000 dingies and $1,500,000 Hatteras, is mind boggling... In considering this fact it occurs to me that the crucial difference between flying and boating is the intrusion of federal regulation into flying which forms the almost insurmountable barrier to entry, not the price of admission... Officious little people with the power to harass and attack you over minor issues ramp check anyone!, ATC recording every turn on the radar track and every transmission, reams of regulations, recurrent training, licensing actually certification... With a boat you sign the bank contract, grab the keys and go... In a few states you have to take a nominal boating course - 3 hours on a thursday night and a ten question exam on the level of, "what side is the red buoy when going up the river?" Anyway, it is the hassle factor that is more the barrier to attracting the twenty something into flying than dull airports... It is the locked gates, the video cameras, the threats of fines and government sanctions, the trolling of your driving record, the demand that you surrender your doctor's chart, the security background checks, having to hand over your certificate at the whim of some pot bellied, tooth pick chewing yahoo, for his official blessing, having to ask permission from the control tower to even move your plane across the ramp, etc., that turns off the MTV generation... The money is out there... Watch the $50,000 SUV's towing the sleek, ski boats heading out of town on Friday afternoon, to go burn a 100 gallons of gas for the weekend... denny |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
In considering this fact it occurs to me that the crucial difference
between flying and boating is the intrusion of federal regulation IMHO that's not even close. With a boat, you can socialize on the boat; you don't have to take the boat anywhere. You can go somewhere and have an instant community of friends just by hanging around the dock. You can take the boat a mile offshore and just sit there all day, for entertainment. An airplane does not have any of those features. Jose -- Nothing takes longer than a shortcut. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 22 Mar 2006 05:37:38 -0800, "Denny" wrote in
.com:: The other issue to think about is that it seems that huge numbers of people millions can find the money in the household budget for boats... And if you think that flying bends the budget, hang around the local marina and go to a few boat shows... The crowds slobbering over $15,000 dingies and $1,500,000 Hatteras, is mind boggling... In considering this fact it occurs to me that the crucial difference between flying and boating is the intrusion of federal regulation into flying which forms the almost insurmountable barrier to entry, not the price of admission... Officious little people with the power to harass and attack you over minor issues ramp check anyone!, ATC recording every turn on the radar track and every transmission, reams of regulations, recurrent training, licensing actually certification... To be fair, you must consider the potential consequences to those over whom we travel; there is no comparable public peril in personal boating. How would you characterize the civil responsibility required of an airman to that of the typical weekend boater? There's another salient difference. long_story Once I was sleeping on the beach at the harbor on Anacapa Island off the California coast, and I found that, if I left the Coleman lantern lit, it kept the scurrying creatures at bay. Around 3am I was awakened to the sound of a small power boat and its occupants landing on the beach. "Thank God you had that lantern lit," they said; they'd found themselves disoriented at sea, low on fuel, and didn't know what to do, so they headed toward the only light they could see. These would not be the sort of folks with whom I'd feel comfortable sharing the sky. /long_story With regard to ramp checks, recently I had a new acquaintance confess to me, that he and a partner purchased a C-182, and proceeded to fly it from their ranch without benefit of airman certificates nor instruction. With so few FAA Inspectors, their chance of being charged with a criminal offence, let alone even being found were/are minimal. Personally, I am happy uniform, worldwide flight regulations exist. Officious little people can usually be used against themselves, and really don't often pose a significant threat. |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ice meteors, climate, sceptics | Brian Sandle | General Aviation | 43 | February 24th 04 01:27 AM |