![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"Dudley Henriques" wrote in message link.net... "BushOKDemocratsSTUPID" wrote in message . .. Is it OK for the FAA or Airlines to pass over white males for black females so the diversity numbers look better? Just curious how airline and private pilots felt about safety positions being filled by unsafe and/or unqualified (Other than White Male) employees? I was once asked if I minded flying with a black co-pilot on a charter. I think my answer was something like... "I don't really give a **** if he's purple as long as he can fly" Hope this answers your question. This guy is an asshole, no question about it. Nevertheless, affirmative action has forced a lowering of standards for controller certification. Why is he an asshole for asking a legtimate air safety question? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BushOKDemocratsSTUPID" wrote in message ... Why is he an asshole for asking a legtimate air safety question? Because of the way the question was phrased. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steven P. McNicoll wrote:
"BushOKDemocratsSTUPID" wrote in message .. . Why is he an asshole for asking a legtimate air safety question? Because of the way the question was phrased. "Because of the way it was phrased"?? Thank you Comrade |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "BushOKDemocratsSTUPID" wrote in message ... Why is he an asshole for asking a legtimate air safety question? Because of the way the question was phrased. "Because of the way it was phrased"?? Yes. Thank you Comrade You're welcome, Asshole. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The mission of the Feds Against Aviation is to harass and antagonize pilots
any way they can. I presume a 'safety position' means they sit, instead of stand (a dangerous position indeed - you could easily fall). Isn't it really better for me if those harassing and antagonizing me are unqualified to do so? It's a damn good thing they got rid of you, as your harassment is beginning to annoy me. "BushOKDemocratsSTUPID" wrote in message ... Is it OK for the FAA or Airlines to pass over white males for black females so the diversity numbers look better? Just curious how airline and private pilots felt about safety positions being filled by unsafe and/or unqualified (Other than White Male) employees? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sure, just ask Bob Hoover. It was so much better for him that the two young
guys who wanted to have a little fun with him were newcomers just out to have a good time. He triumphed over those specious accusations so quickly, easily and cheaply. Or, the fellow selling the Ford alternators with a blank 337. Or the pilot who was virtually harassed to death by unscrupulous FAA employees-- the IG finally issuing a report identifying the unconscionable and illegal conduct of FAA employees as a cause of a fatal crash. I worked in government for more than a decade. Many appointments were made simply because of the race or sex of the person involved. Many of those hired were utterly imcompetent. In an office environment, especially in ordinary government functions, imcompetence can be tolerated, perhaps even glorified. The OP started out on the wrong foot by using language which generates more heat than light, but I don't think anyone could argue that the only the best qualified people should be employed in positions crucial to public safety, such as ATC positions. I also don't think there is any real argument that government doesn't make hiring or promotion decisions without (or with little) regard to competence. If it is posting the payment for your water bill, a mistake here or there only causes irritation. Simply slinging epithets doesn't advance the discussion. "Steve Foley" wrote in message news:TmiUf.2652$hA2.1657@trndny02... The mission of the Feds Against Aviation is to harass and antagonize pilots any way they can. I presume a 'safety position' means they sit, instead of stand (a dangerous position indeed - you could easily fall). Isn't it really better for me if those harassing and antagonizing me are unqualified to do so? It's a damn good thing they got rid of you, as your harassment is beginning to annoy me. "BushOKDemocratsSTUPID" wrote in message ... Is it OK for the FAA or Airlines to pass over white males for black females so the diversity numbers look better? Just curious how airline and private pilots felt about safety positions being filled by unsafe and/or unqualified (Other than White Male) employees? |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, LWG posted:
I worked in government for more than a decade. Many appointments were made simply because of the race or sex of the person involved. Many of those hired were utterly imcompetent. In an office environment, especially in ordinary government functions, imcompetence can be tolerated, perhaps even glorified. I disagree that "incompetence can be tolerated...", it happens, and people have to deal with it. But, it has *always* happened, whether it be the son of the owner that runs the company under or the MBA that made a few critical bad decisions with the same result. It is not an issue of race or gender. The OP started out on the wrong foot by using language which generates more heat than light, but I don't think anyone could argue that the only the best qualified people should be employed in positions crucial to public safety, such as ATC positions. Ideally, everyone in a position crucial to public safety should be the best qualified. However, that has never been the case, and is not likely to ever be the case. People are selected for positions for many reasons, only a few have to do with their actual competence or readiness for the job at hand. Neil |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree with you. I think I could have said it better, perhaps
"incompetence can be accommodated..." The difference here is that when the son runs the family business into the ground, it's their loss. When incompetent government employees run things into the ground, they get promoted. The American taxpayer is the only resource which is indefinitely extensible. Oil, the oceans and atmospheric ozone are all finite and fragile. However, my power to pay for everything from B-2's to lapdances for the homeless to urine-drenched crucifixes has no limit. " I disagree that "incompetence can be tolerated...", it happens, and people have to deal with it. But, it has *always* happened, whether it be the son of the owner that runs the company under or the MBA that made a few critical bad decisions with the same result. It is not an issue of race or gender. The problem is the arrogance of those newly annointed with power is breathtaking. In our metropolitan government, we had the minority managers fire white males, and then have the unbridled temerity to tell them that was the only reason they were being let go. I did give them a few points for candor. Of course there were the inevitable lawsuits. But not only did the taxpayers get to pay the salaries of the managers who made the racist decisions, they got to pay the salaries of the unqualified employees who were hired by the government, as well as the salaries of the government lawyers defending the action, and the fees of the lawyers representing the white male employees, and the damages awarded to employees who were victimized by this conduct. Government employment is the very antithesis of the free market, which is why our Founding Fathers intended to keep the federal government so small. Ideally, everyone in a position crucial to public safety should be the best qualified. However, that has never been the case, and is not likely to ever be the case. People are selected for positions for many reasons, only a few have to do with their actual competence or readiness for the job at hand. Neil |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "LWG" wrote in message . .. Simply slinging epithets doesn't advance the discussion. Why would I even consider 'advancing the discussion' with someone who spews hate. The original poster will never listen. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Foley wrote:
"LWG" wrote in message ... Simply slinging epithets doesn't advance the discussion. Why would I even consider 'advancing the discussion' with someone who spews hate. The original poster will never listen. Grow some skin. Simply asking if it could be a safety issue hiring black females in critical aviation safety positions for diversity numbers over white males that are more qualified is not by any means "Spewing hate" Grow up and Grow some skin you PC brainwashed wimp |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rogue's Gallery Update -- Talk about diversity! | Jay Honeck | Home Built | 52 | May 11th 05 05:18 PM |
Rogue's Gallery Update -- Talk about diversity! | Jay Honeck | Owning | 51 | May 11th 05 05:18 PM |
Rogue's Gallery Update -- Talk about diversity! | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 52 | May 11th 05 05:18 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 03:04 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |