![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I personally don't have any time in the glider, and I'll take you and
the test pilots at their word. The issue is that in real world situations it has demonstrated a statistic for killing people. In a training environment, you have to consider that while you need a glider that will spin effectively for training purposes, you also need one that is going to be more forgiving of mistakes. Mistakes are a part of training. Therefore it's not the glider you want to use. Gary O'Neill wrote: You are referring to the the Puchacz,I will be straight ,I am not a fan of this glider "but " the british Test Pilot school have put this glider through the the program and found no unusual flight/spin modes. The conclusion was you must do spin recoveries by the book and no halfway methods will work. The consensus from the instructors seems to be that it is a good trainer. gary |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I agree and disagree with you ,I have watched the Puchaczdo do an
aerobatics/handling display and as part of the display a spin was initiated around a 1000 feet ,the glider seemed to lose the same altitude as several other 2 seaters but more quickly. In the real world we are going to eventually fly a model or type of glider that will require correct control inputs to recover from a spin, it is better that there is a model that will give you that training of how to do it correctly. I have seen posts on RAS suggesting people go find an instructor current on spinning a Cessna and do spin training simply because so few of the 2 seater designs will spin. gary "Gary Emerson" wrote in message . com... I personally don't have any time in the glider, and I'll take you and the test pilots at their word. The issue is that in real world situations it has demonstrated a statistic for killing people. In a training environment, you have to consider that while you need a glider that will spin effectively for training purposes, you also need one that is going to be more forgiving of mistakes. Mistakes are a part of training. Therefore it's not the glider you want to use. Gary O'Neill wrote: You are referring to the the Puchacz,I will be straight ,I am not a fan of this glider "but " the british Test Pilot school have put this glider through the the program and found no unusual flight/spin modes. The conclusion was you must do spin recoveries by the book and no halfway methods will work. The consensus from the instructors seems to be that it is a good trainer. gary |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My point is that there are other ships in existence that spin
effectively so as to allow the teaching of spins and spin recovery that don't have a reputation of killing people. Anyone can "spin in" if they screw things up at low altitude. Masak appears to be an example of this unfortunately. However, if you polled the glider community I don't think anyone would come forward and say Blaniks, DGs, LSs, Schleichers, or Schempp gliders have a particular tendency to spin in. This is the case with the Puchacz and it seems to stand out in this regard. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary Emerson wrote:
My point is that there are other ships in existence that spin effectively so as to allow the teaching of spins and spin recovery that don't have a reputation of killing people. Anyone can "spin in" if they screw things up at low altitude. Masak appears to be an example of this unfortunately. However, if you polled the glider community I don't think anyone would come forward and say Blaniks, DGs, LSs, Schleichers, or Schempp gliders have a particular tendency to spin in. This is the case with the Puchacz and it seems to stand out in this regard. The Puchacz does have very powerful air brakes and, because it doesn't drop its nose when they are deployed, the unwary can lose a lot of airspeed when they are deployed. This is rather like selecting landing flap in an ASW-20. This tendency to shed speed when the brakes are deployed is at odds with a G103 (which speeds up) or and ASK-21 (which shows very little speed change). I wonder if this is where its 'bad reputation' comes from? -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
USS LIBERTY VETERAN ASSOC FILES WAR CRIMES AGAINST ISRAEL | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 30 | June 13th 05 01:30 AM |
Air Ops North Atlantic - Ron Knott | Greasy Rider© @invalid.com | Naval Aviation | 1 | June 4th 05 06:52 PM |
USS Liberty Challenge/Reward | Issac Goldberg | Naval Aviation | 75 | July 16th 04 09:28 PM |
THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES | Ewe n0 who | Naval Aviation | 4 | February 21st 04 09:01 PM |
THOMAS MOORER, EX-JOINT CHIEFS CHAIR DIES | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 2 | February 12th 04 12:52 AM |