![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chain drives have the same effect.
Belt and chain drives do impose side loads on the front crankshaft journal, however, so that is a negative point. Another issue is packaging ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Well written explanation but this is incorrect. The sideload is imposed on the rearmain journal of the crank, not the front one. Most redrives that use the cog belt also incorporate an idler bearing outboard of the lower sprocket, that prevents the sideload forces on the crank. Also I think a multivee belt will not transfer 1000 hp, I don't think it would evem work on my 330 hp+ auto engine powered plane. I will stick with my cog belt, thank you. Ben www.haaspowerair.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PSRU design advantages | ADK | Home Built | 74 | April 12th 06 09:31 PM |
light twins? | Bellsouth News Server | Home Built | 83 | August 12th 05 02:56 AM |
Aircraft engine certification FAR's | Corky Scott | Home Built | 4 | July 25th 03 06:46 PM |