![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stealth Pilot wrote:
On Mon, 01 May 2006 22:23:50 -0700, Ron Wanttaja wrote: On Tue, 2 May 2006 00:36:12 -0400, "Morgans" wrote: "Richard Lamb" wrote I heard rumor it was shot down... That's one hell of a good shot, if it really was at 12,000 feet, as it was reported to be! g Reminds me about the story about the Fed pouncing on a rancher who'd fired a rifle at a military fighter that he claimed had been buzzing his cattle. The fighter pilot denied it, claiming he'd been in straight-and-level flight several thousand feet up. Fighter pilot, however, could NOT explain why the rifle bullet's exit hole was only slightly higher on the left side of the fuselage than the entry hole in the right.... Ron Wanttaja turning while shot. a steep turn would make the situation easily achieved. Stealth pilot The pilot said "straight and level." See above. Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ".Blueskies." wrote: "Richard Lamb" wrote in message ... Morgans wrote: I read in Avweb that a predator crashed, recently. Anyone wanna make a bet, that it's Rotax puked? g Sorry, everyone. I couldn't pass up the opportunity! :-) -- Jim in NC I heard rumor it was shot down... RC planes get shot down pretty often - the term used when someone interferes with your radio signal causing a loss of control... ;-) small emp would do it... |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Andy Asberry wrote: On Mon, 1 May 2006 20:06:34 -0400, "Morgans" wrote: I read in Avweb that a predator crashed, recently. Anyone wanna make a bet, that it's Rotax puked? g Sorry, everyone. I couldn't pass up the opportunity! :-) Her's a link to a photo and some info on a Global Hawk. http://www.asberry.net/Aircraft.htm --Andy Asberry recommends NewsGuy-- LoL! Rotax? That thing is a monster! |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Lamb" wrote in message ... Andy Asberry wrote: On Mon, 1 May 2006 20:06:34 -0400, "Morgans" wrote: I read in Avweb that a predator crashed, recently. Anyone wanna make a bet, that it's Rotax puked? g Sorry, everyone. I couldn't pass up the opportunity! :-) Her's a link to a photo and some info on a Global Hawk. http://www.asberry.net/Aircraft.htm --Andy Asberry recommends NewsGuy-- LoL! Rotax? That thing is a monster! It was not the Global Hawk, but the Predator B. Still a monster, though. I would have thought they were using the original Predator, with the Rotax. I guess they have more of our money than they know what to do with. :-( -- Jim in NC |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dan wrote: Stealth Pilot wrote: On Mon, 01 May 2006 22:23:50 -0700, Ron Wanttaja wrote: On Tue, 2 May 2006 00:36:12 -0400, "Morgans" wrote: "Richard Lamb" wrote I heard rumor it was shot down... That's one hell of a good shot, if it really was at 12,000 feet, as it was reported to be! g Reminds me about the story about the Fed pouncing on a rancher who'd fired a rifle at a military fighter that he claimed had been buzzing his cattle. The fighter pilot denied it, claiming he'd been in straight-and-level flight several thousand feet up. Fighter pilot, however, could NOT explain why the rifle bullet's exit hole was only slightly higher on the left side of the fuselage than the entry hole in the right.... Ron Wanttaja turning while shot. a steep turn would make the situation easily achieved. Stealth pilot The pilot said "straight and level." See above. The pilot said "several thousand feet up", too. See above. That would be a rather spectacularly good shot on the part of the rancher. -- FF |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
![]() A lttle discussed issue about RPVs is that they do not survive ordinary use that well. I read somewhere that 1000 hours has rarely been exceeded before some glitch or other stuffs them into a hillside or cornfield even without being shot at. The Predator has a lot of landing mishaps, but class A accidents are close to predicted rates. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard Lamb wrote: interesting... The rumor that a UAV was shot down and everybody assumes it was some hich farmer with a blunderbuss. From AvWeek - The drone was transitioning from control by its General Atomics pilot to an automatic flying mode, said Kostelnik, a former commander of the USAF Armament Center. The drone dropped from 10,000 feet above ground after a total system failure. An on-board fire or hostile attack are not immediately suspected. "It's pretty much destroyed, it's not going to be reparable," Kostelnik said. CBP Air and Marine already is talking with General Atomics about a "loaner" Predator. No one was hurt by the crash in the air or on the ground, Kostelnik said. A CBP-led team, with representatives from General Atomics, the National Transportation Safety Board and possibly including the Air Force, already is investigating the incident, but results won't be known for several weeks, he said. "It wasn't the thing going berserk and going away. It had some sort of massive technical, mechanical failure, who knows," he said. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Richard Riley wrote: Richard Lamb wrote: interesting... The rumor that a UAV was shot down and everybody assumes it was some hich farmer with a blunderbuss. From AvWeek - The drone was transitioning from control by its General Atomics pilot to an automatic flying mode, said Kostelnik, a former commander of the USAF Armament Center. The drone dropped from 10,000 feet above ground after a total system failure. An on-board fire or hostile attack are not immediately suspected. "It's pretty much destroyed, it's not going to be reparable," Kostelnik said. CBP Air and Marine already is talking with General Atomics about a "loaner" Predator. No one was hurt by the crash in the air or on the ground, Kostelnik said. A CBP-led team, with representatives from General Atomics, the National Transportation Safety Board and possibly including the Air Force, already is investigating the incident, but results won't be known for several weeks, he said. "It wasn't the thing going berserk and going away. It had some sort of massive technical, mechanical failure, who knows," he said. Thanks, Richard Richard |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Lamb" wrote Thanks, Richard Richard *ONE* of you, or the other, really need to consider changing your ID, and/or sig line. Like going with Richard R, or Richard L, or whatever. All of the "Richard's" in the "from" line and sig lines are really getting confusing, and are totally overwhelming me! g "Who's on first?" -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|