A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Future of aviation - fact or fiction



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old May 11th 06, 07:30 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Future of aviation - fact or fiction

"Jay Honeck" wrote in message
oups.com...
If you selected those quotes because they seemed the most amusing or
'far-fetched', then they're actually impressively close to reality.


Well, maybe for the rarified elite who can afford to buy brand new
planes equipped with G1000 glass panels.

For the rest of us, that prediction is still far, far in the future.
And, of course, weather is still the same deal-killer it was in the
50s.

The author was only off by, say, 70 years? :-)


C'mon Jay, it's only about 40 years off. This falls exactly in line with the
typical FAA project timeline!

I enjoyed Gene's post. Gives us all incentive to keep dreaming.

Marco




Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com
  #12  
Old May 11th 06, 07:44 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Future of aviation - fact or fiction


"Gene Seibel" wrote in message
ups.com...
Monday I made a stop on a cross country flight to have lunch with my
daughter. Afterwards we dropped in to a used book store to browse. As
usual I migrated to the aviation section. The gem I laid my eyes on
this time was written in 1957 and titled, "Flying the Omnirange." It
touts the advantages and incredible possibilities of the fantastic new
VHF onmidirectional radio range (VOR) that was replacing the
low-frequency rado ranges in the 1950's. Here are a few paragraphs that
you may find interesting and mildly amusing.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


I have a sectional chart from the Roswell, NM area dated 1945. There are
Danger Areas, Prohibited Areas, a handful of NDBs (the Roswell NDB still has
the same frequency that it had then). There is a note on one corner that
says if you are caught passing the information on the chart to the enemy you
will be charged with treason. On the other corner is the price: twenty-five
cents : )

Allen


  #13  
Old May 11th 06, 07:49 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Future of aviation - fact or fiction

Allen wrote:

I have a sectional chart from the Roswell, NM area dated 1945. There are
Danger Areas, Prohibited Areas, a handful of NDBs (the Roswell NDB still has
the same frequency that it had then).


Of course it does! Do you think UFOs have access to current charts and
NOTAMs?
  #16  
Old May 11th 06, 08:15 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Future of aviation - fact or fiction

("Jay Honeck" wrote)
Well, maybe for the rarified elite who can afford to buy brand new planes
equipped with G1000 glass panels.

For the rest of us, that prediction is still far, far in the future.



Two of Kevin's posts (below) about flying around on the taxpayer's nickel -
he's kidding. g.

....still, $35 wet* for a 172 is pretty good - if you can find it.

I suspect, with CAP, he'll be flying around in a "brand new" Cessna 182
G1000 glass panel plane pretty soon. (IIRC, I saw one last fall belonging to
CAP, at the MSP "Grand Openning Event" for Runway 17/35)

All I'm saying is...
There are options for ascending into the 'rarified air of the elite.' Call
it the backstairs. :-)

[Posts by: Kevin Dunlevey - rec.aviation.student]
Mon, Apr 24 2006 9:42 pm

I've gotten a lot out of joining CAP, in flying, training and having a
purpose to fly.

In addition to being a Mission Pilot, I fly cadet orientation flights, work
mission staff and am a legal officer. I've logged two or three hundred
hours at taxpayer expense in the last two or three years flying as a Mission
Pilot or Cadet Orientation Pilot. I like kids, and flying the cadets has
taught me amount about human nature in a training environment. Flying the
search and rescue missions fulfills my desire to volunteer for a public
purpose.

I joined when I had just over 100 PIC hours. After passing a Form 5, which
is essentially the same as the FAA private pilot checkride and oral exam,
you can rent CAP aircraft, typically C-172s and C-182s. (CAP is
transitioning from 172s to 182s, and I think is only buying 182s now.) I
typically pay about $50 per hour tach time wet for a 172. If I keep the
throttle back at 2100 RPMs, my tach time is usually about 2/3s of Hobbs
time. So I can do 10 touch and goes, and clear my mind of petty things, for
about $35.

After you have 175 PIC hours you can train as a Mission Pilot. After 200
PIC hours you can fly Cadet Orientation Flights. After 300 hours and a
commercial rating, you can fly ROTC Cadet Orientation Flights.

CAP is a good way to build hours, but I'm not in CAP to build hours. I fly
because it makes me feel good, and CAP keeps me flying. I also like the
opportunity to give public service, and the chance for dual time with lots
of pilots far more experienced than me.


[Post by: Kevin Dunlevey - rec.aviation.student]
Tues, Jan 31 2006 11:15 pm

My son recruited me into Civil Air Patrol when I had about 150 hours. I'd
taken my kids to everyplace within an hour flight that I could feed them.
They were getting bored with flying, and my wife was stridently bored. After
joining CAP, passing a Form 5 test, which is essentially flying to PTS
standards, and getting up to 200 PIC hours, I began flying cadets. Flying
them, and letting them fly, has given me good insight into the human nature
of pilots. About the same time I began flying cadets, I began training for
search and rescue missions. Now only a few years later I have about 800
hours and most of it has been in service of society.

CAP has given me a purpose for my flying, beyond the recreation and mental
rinse therapy I get from flying, and it has been much more affordable than a
$125 per hour 172. In addition to getting more purpose, I've gotten a ton
of training. I have more dual hours with seasoned instructors now than I had
in total PIC hours when I started in CAP. I fly for proficiency, for cadet
orientation flights, or for mission training about twice a week. I know if
I go more than about a week or two without flying that my proficiency begins
to deteriorate.

When I fly cadets, I need to pick up a plane about a half hour from where I
pick up the cadets. That half hour flight gives me time to get my head into
flying that I wouldn't have if the cadets were at the same airport as the
plane. That tells me that half an hour around the cabbage patch will get
you back up to speed.


Montblack

  #17  
Old May 12th 06, 02:26 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Future of aviation - fact or fiction

Actually, for me, the unknowns are what makes flying interesting.
--
Gene Seibel
Tales of Flight - http://pad39a.com/gene/tales.html
Because I fly, I envy no one.

  #18  
Old May 12th 06, 02:29 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Future of aviation - fact or fiction

I have a sectional chart from the Roswell, NM area dated 1945. There are
Danger Areas, Prohibited Areas, a handful of NDBs (the Roswell NDB still has
the same frequency that it had then). There is a note on one corner that
says if you are caught passing the information on the chart to the enemy you
will be charged with treason. On the other corner is the price: twenty-five
cents : )


My A&P showed me an old Des Moines Sectional Chart (long since
eliminated) from the 1960s. It was:

- Printed on very sturdy paper, unlike the ones we have today that must
be scotch-taped at the seams immediately, or they shred.

- The color was quite vibrant, compared to today's, even 40 years old.

- The map was one-sided. The flip side contained a plethora of
information that we can only wish was on today's sectionals.

- The price was forty cents.
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

  #19  
Old May 12th 06, 07:18 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Future of aviation - fact or fiction

In article .com,
says...


- The map was one-sided. The flip side contained a plethora of
information that we can only wish was on today's sectionals.



Was it twice as big as ours today?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
The Future of Naval Aviation. Mike Naval Aviation 0 March 22nd 06 07:16 PM
ATC User Fees Larry Dighera Piloting 80 May 12th 05 07:20 AM
How safe is it, really? June Piloting 227 December 10th 04 05:01 AM
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund Dr. Guenther Eichhorn Aerobatics 0 May 11th 04 10:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.