![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The main reason the IO engine is more efficient is the compression ratio is
higher. The compression ratio is in the numerator of the efficiency formula, so there is a direct relationship. Karl ATP CFI ETC "Curator" N185KG "Montblack" wrote in message ... wrote) The IO-360 thus has a lower specific fuel consumption (the per-hour fuel flow required per hp produced). Reason: I think the main one is that the better fuel distribution on the FI engine allows operation with a leaner mixture. Curious - If approval from the FAA was NOT a factor: How difficult, practical, expensive, etc, would it be to convert an O to an IO? What all would be involved? What would go, what would stay, etc? Thanks. Montblack |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Home Built Aircraft - Alternative Engines - Geo/Suzuki | OtisWinslow | Home Built | 1 | October 12th 05 02:55 PM |
Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch | Paul | Home Built | 0 | October 18th 04 10:14 PM |
P-3C Ditches with Four Engines Out, All Survive! | Scet | Military Aviation | 6 | September 27th 04 01:09 AM |
Engines and Reliability | Dylan Smith | Piloting | 13 | June 30th 04 03:27 PM |
Accident Statistics: Certified vs. Non-Certified Engines | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 23 | January 18th 04 05:36 PM |