![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not that I'm too savvy about this, but what I recall the Columbia shuttle
burned on reentry, and at that stage the shuttle would be mainly a glider with very little onboard fuel? I believe Big John's SR-71 question was referring to the Challenger explosion -- not the Columbia re-entry break-up. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
me too
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-05-30 15:02, Jay Honeck wrote:
Not that I'm too savvy about this, but what I recall the Columbia shuttle burned on reentry, and at that stage the shuttle would be mainly a glider with very little onboard fuel? I believe Big John's SR-71 question was referring to the Challenger explosion -- not the Columbia re-entry break-up. Oh, sorry, mea culpa; I read too much into the SR-71 issue; I was trying to make a sensible connection to the SR-71 question, and when such a craft might have been used close to the shuttle. I can't imagine NASA would put one anywhere near a launch site, since it's not very manouverable, and AFAIK they have other craft for launch photography. (Noone else uses SR71:s nowadays, if at all, but back in -86 it was still in use by the USAF; but they would surely have stayed far away too.) IMO, it could perhaps have been useful for watching a shuttle during the descent, since that is pretty straight until the breaking turns. But as stated before, the lost SR-71 is probably an urban legend. /Rolf |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In any case, all space launches involve very strictly
controlled restricted airspace. No aircraft are allowed anywhere near the launch vehicle flight path because of the risk of a mid-air. There are planes doing airspace monitoring. probably armed F16 or FA18. But an SR71 would not be a good choice for monitoring the launch from a close point, although it might be 100 miles away as a training or evaluation of its detection equipment. "Jay Honeck" wrote in message news:cnXeg.754859$084.22232@attbi_s22... | Not that I'm too savvy about this, but what I recall the Columbia shuttle | burned on reentry, and at that stage the shuttle would be mainly a glider | with very little onboard fuel? | | I believe Big John's SR-71 question was referring to the Challenger | explosion -- not the Columbia re-entry break-up. | -- | Jay Honeck | Iowa City, IA | Pathfinder N56993 | www.AlexisParkInn.com | "Your Aviation Destination" | | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A chance to give something back | Jack Allison | Piloting | 14 | October 23rd 05 11:41 PM |
Calling all aviation enthusiasts – this is your chance to see two classic RAF movies on the big screen (Hull - Yorkshire). | Phillip Rhodes | Military Aviation | 0 | September 7th 04 01:30 PM |
[Media] A Marine's journey home | Michael Wise | Military Aviation | 0 | May 3rd 04 04:57 AM |
[Media] A Marine's journey home | Michael Wise | Naval Aviation | 0 | May 3rd 04 04:57 AM |
Need Powerpoint soaring presentation for Kiwanis group (USA) | Eric Greenwell | Soaring | 8 | August 16th 03 06:58 PM |