![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 01:34:50 GMT, "Jeff Lewis" wrote:
The FAA dinged an A&P for not complying with a "mandatory" SB prior to returning an aircraft to service in a part 91 environment. The NTSB upheld it, breaking with decades of precedent. I read the NTSN Order Number EA5221 and what this A&P did was flat wrong. I agree with the law judge in this case after reading what happen. I tried to google for "NTSN Order Number EA5221" and got nothing. Could you please take a minute and give to me your opinion of what the A&P did that was flat wrong. Misprint by the OP...should have searched for "NTSB EA-5221". http://www.ntsb.gov/O_n_O/docs/AVIATION/5221.PDF Ron Wanttaja |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
Mini-500 Accident Analysis | Dennis Fetters | Rotorcraft | 16 | September 3rd 05 11:35 AM |
FLASH! U.S.A. Rules Committee to Address Rules Complexity? | SoarPoint | Soaring | 1 | February 3rd 04 02:36 AM |