![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 22 Jun 2006 10:18:47 -0700, "Peter Duniho"
wrote in : ... I'm a bit surprised that there doesn't appear to be anything in the FARs that at least provides an exception from the FARs for the operation of radio-controlled models, but perhaps that's implied by some broader exception I didn't notice. I think the decision has been made administratively rather than legislatively. Here are the three links, in chronological order, from the longer post I just made in this thread: 1981: http://www.eoss.org/faa/ac91-57.pdf 2003: http://www.ihsaviation.com/faa/N8700.25.pdf 2005: http://www.eoss.org/faa/AFS_400_UAS_POLICY_05_01.pdf In other words, you won't find the exception spelled out in the FARS. That said, it does seem to me that there's an obvious difference between what is considered a UAV (as used by law enforcement, for example) and a radio-controlled model. Even ignoring the usual difference in size and flight altitude (which we may as well, since those are not absolutes even for model airplanes), the primary difference is that radio-controlled models are always flown in direct sight, under direct control of the operator. Not always. An FAI record was set by Maynard Hill by an aircraft that was piloted by RC for takeoff, then flown under internal guidance across the Atlantic, and landed under RC control in Ireland. http://tam.plannet21.com/ The plane AND fuel weighed 5 kg (11 pounds) at takeoff. It was designed, built, and tuned for the flight by Hill, who was 77 years old and legally blind at the time of the flight in 2003. The flight last 38 hours, 52 minutes, 19 seconds. It covered 1881.6 miles. The engine was 10 cc (~0.61 ci), highly modified by Hill. In this respect, Cmdr. Sid Heal does seem to miss the point in thinking that his law enforcement craft are somehow equivalent to radio-controlled model airplanes. Recreational aircraft should not be operated over a heavily-populated area. To make a police UAV safe would require far more redundancy than is ordinarily found in recreational RC models. Marty |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cessna Glare Shield Cover | Al Gilson | Owning | 4 | March 21st 06 03:04 AM |
Musings on SOARING cover photos | Ray Lovinggood | Soaring | 19 | March 8th 05 02:30 AM |
Minor changes to USA FAR's 2005 | Burt Compton | Soaring | 0 | December 20th 04 10:24 PM |
This week's AW&ST: apparently THAAD will have some ABM (as in anti- *ICBM*) capability. | Scott Ferrin | Military Aviation | 29 | August 31st 04 04:20 AM |
Full airplane cover? | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 4 | May 5th 04 04:33 PM |