![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() FlipSide wrote: This is completely unecessary and idiotic. If the FAA had their way they would disallow any VFR flying in the US period. You're an idiot. The FAA has never said they want to stop VFR. They won't say that either because they know better than most that the system cannot handle all the aircraft that are airborne at any given time. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's a little harsh, don't you think?
Newps wrote: FlipSide wrote: This is completely unecessary and idiotic. If the FAA had their way they would disallow any VFR flying in the US period. You're an idiot. The FAA has never said they want to stop VFR. They won't say that either because they know better than most that the system cannot handle all the aircraft that are airborne at any given time. -- "The whole religious complexion of the modern world is due to the absence from Jerusalem of a Lunatic Asylum." - Havelock Ellis |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 07 Jul 2006 07:33:55 -0700, Terry wrote:
That's a little harsh, don't you think? Newps wrote: FlipSide wrote: This is completely unecessary and idiotic. If the FAA had their way they would disallow any VFR flying in the US period. You're an idiot. The FAA has never said they want to stop VFR. They won't say that either because they know better than most that the system cannot handle all the aircraft that are airborne at any given time. Apparently the sarcasm is not readliy evident....something I should have empasized with a little emoticon or something. I was thinking that it was a little harsh too. I can't say that I have ever encountered a stranger in the real world that would be so abrupt in response to a sarcastic comment. I would only expect that kind of response from a good friend. But maybe if I lived in a different part of the country or another country altogether a response like that would have been a more common occurrence. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nope.
Terry wrote: That's a little harsh, don't you think? Newps wrote: FlipSide wrote: This is completely unecessary and idiotic. If the FAA had their way they would disallow any VFR flying in the US period. You're an idiot. The FAA has never said they want to stop VFR. They won't say that either because they know better than most that the system cannot handle all the aircraft that are airborne at any given time. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Piloting | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
Associate Publisher Wanted - Aviation & Business Journals | Mergatroide | General Aviation | 1 | January 13th 04 08:26 PM |
Need critics - new European general aviation website | Yuri Vorontsov | General Aviation | 0 | October 28th 03 09:30 PM |