![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
some disturbing news was revealed at the last eaa mtg, when one of the
members got up and passed out a copy of the latest city ordinance, amending what a residential dweller could do and have at their dwelling. enclosed is a copy of the admendment. the interesting point is how specifically the homebuilder was targeted, without ever being mentioned in the doucument. the part about the airboats was just an oportunity for the council members who have a problem with airboaters, to jump on board for a free ride. the disturbing issue is how the whole thing was put togeather with the most obscure notification imaginable. it was published in a local financial paper that has minimal circulation in the mainstream populace(the name escapes me at the moment.), however, it qualifies as public notice media. now! the ripple effect. joe flyer has been working on his $30k plus kit for the last however many years and now finds out he has a garage of illegal junk, that he can never finish, legally, due to the stroke of a pen. if u read it closely, u realize it includes model planes also. so now all the hobby shops can no longer sell model air plane kits to residents of the city(which btw, includes all the county, since the city limits is the county line.(makes the police and sheriff depts, one and the same.) the individual responsible for causing this piece of trash ordinance, is an eaa chapt member who lives next door to a busy-body that can't stand to see him working on his project at his home. due to here relentless resentment of his activites next door, he has paid numerous fines and court costs for not removing his project from his property. this new amendment is the final straw to shut him down. it would be curious to know as to how she found a receptive ear on the city council, to pen and pass such discriminatory legislation. fore warned is fore armed. don't let this happen in your town. Introduced by Council Member Lake Ray and amended on the floor of the council: Ordinance 2006-543-e An ordinance amending chapter 656 (zoning code), part 4 (supplementary regulations), subpart b (miscellaneous regulations), ordinance code, establishing section 656.420 (parking, storage, construction and repair of flying craft and airboats in residential districts, and amending part 16 (definitions), section 656.1601 (definitions, ordinance code to include a definition for flying craft; providing an effective date. Whereas, parking or storing flying craft and airboats in unenclosed spaces, including a carport, is not an operation in keeping with the character of a residential neighborhood, and Whereas, repairing, testing, operating, constructing, modifying or altering flying aircraft and airboats anywhere on a residential lot is not an operation in keeping with the character of a residential neighborhood, now thereof. Be it ordained by the council of the city of Jacksonville: Section 1. Creation of section 656.420, chapter 656 ordinance code. Chapter 656 (zoning code), part 4 (supplementary regulations), ordinance code is amended to create a new section 656.420 (parking, storage, repair and operation flying craft and airboats in residential districts) to read as follows: Chapter 656 zoning code *** Part 4. Supplementary Regulations Subpart A. Performance standards and development criteria *** Sec. 656.420. Parking, storage, repair and operation of flying craft and airboats in residential districts. (a) Flying craft and airboats shall not be parked or stored, other than in completely enclosed buildings, on residentially-zoned property, including residential PUD districts and properties with a residential component in a mixed-use PUD district. Airboats may however, be parked or stored in the water adjacent to, on docking facilities of, or in a yard fronting a navigable waterbody of, a residential PUD district and a property in the residential portion of a mixed-use PUD district. (b) Repairing, testing, operation, constructing, modifying or altering flying craft and airboats shall be prohibited in all residential districts, including residential PUD districts and properties with a residential component in a mixed-use PUD district. Section 2. Amendment to section 656.1601, Ordinance Code. Section 656.1601, Ordinance Code, is hereby amended as follows: Chapter 656 zoning code *** Part 16. definitions Sec.656.1601. Definitions. *** (this does not apply to the aviation issue)Floor area means, except as specifically indicated in relation to particular districts and uses, the sum of the gross horizontal area of several floors of a building measured from the exterior faces of the exterior wall or from the centerline of the walls separating two buildings, excluding attic areas with a headroom of less than seven feet, unenclosed stairs or fire escapes, elevator structures, cooling towers, areas devoted to air conditioning, ventilating, heating or other building machinery and equipment, parking structures and basements space where the ceiling is not more than an average of 48 inches above the general finished and grade level of the adjacent portion of the lot. (this does apply to the aviation issue)Flying craft means any vehicle designed for navigation in the air or through outer space, including but not limited to airplanes, helicopters and hot air balloons. *** Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective upon signature by the mayor or upon becoming effective without the mayor's signature. Form approved: /a/ Dylan T. Reingold Office of General Counsel Legislation Prepared by: Dylan Reingold |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sounds like someone needs to talk with their city
council to figure out what the real issues are and try to reach a compromise such that everyone can be happy. Getting ****ed off and ignoring your neighbor's concerns doesn't work well. If they were working in their closed garage and not making a lot of noise, then no one would even know what they were doing, and it would not be a concern. Now their only choice is to rent a hangar with some buddies, or move to another town. Like they say: "you can't fight city hall" Don W. greatav8or wrote: some disturbing news was revealed at the last eaa mtg, when one of the members got up and passed out a copy of the latest city ordinance, amending what a residential dweller could do and have at their dwelling. enclosed is a copy of the admendment. the interesting point is how specifically the homebuilder was targeted, without ever being mentioned in the doucument. the part about the airboats was just an oportunity for the council members who have a problem with airboaters, to jump on board for a free ride. the disturbing issue is how the whole thing was put togeather with the most obscure notification imaginable. it was published in a local financial paper that has minimal circulation in the mainstream populace(the name escapes me at the moment.), however, it qualifies as public notice media. now! the ripple effect. joe flyer has been working on his $30k plus kit for the last however many years and now finds out he has a garage of illegal junk, that he can never finish, legally, due to the stroke of a pen. if u read it closely, u realize it includes model planes also. so now all the hobby shops can no longer sell model air plane kits to residents of the city(which btw, includes all the county, since the city limits is the county line.(makes the police and sheriff depts, one and the same.) the individual responsible for causing this piece of trash ordinance, is an eaa chapt member who lives next door to a busy-body that can't stand to see him working on his project at his home. due to here relentless resentment of his activites next door, he has paid numerous fines and court costs for not removing his project from his property. this new amendment is the final straw to shut him down. it would be curious to know as to how she found a receptive ear on the city council, to pen and pass such discriminatory legislation. fore warned is fore armed. don't let this happen in your town. Introduced by Council Member Lake Ray and amended on the floor of the council: Ordinance 2006-543-e An ordinance amending chapter 656 (zoning code), part 4 (supplementary regulations), subpart b (miscellaneous regulations), ordinance code, establishing section 656.420 (parking, storage, construction and repair of flying craft and airboats in residential districts, and amending part 16 (definitions), section 656.1601 (definitions, ordinance code to include a definition for flying craft; providing an effective date. Whereas, parking or storing flying craft and airboats in unenclosed spaces, including a carport, is not an operation in keeping with the character of a residential neighborhood, and Whereas, repairing, testing, operating, constructing, modifying or altering flying aircraft and airboats anywhere on a residential lot is not an operation in keeping with the character of a residential neighborhood, now thereof. Be it ordained by the council of the city of Jacksonville: Section 1. Creation of section 656.420, chapter 656 ordinance code. Chapter 656 (zoning code), part 4 (supplementary regulations), ordinance code is amended to create a new section 656.420 (parking, storage, repair and operation flying craft and airboats in residential districts) to read as follows: Chapter 656 zoning code *** Part 4. Supplementary Regulations Subpart A. Performance standards and development criteria *** Sec. 656.420. Parking, storage, repair and operation of flying craft and airboats in residential districts. (a) Flying craft and airboats shall not be parked or stored, other than in completely enclosed buildings, on residentially-zoned property, including residential PUD districts and properties with a residential component in a mixed-use PUD district. Airboats may however, be parked or stored in the water adjacent to, on docking facilities of, or in a yard fronting a navigable waterbody of, a residential PUD district and a property in the residential portion of a mixed-use PUD district. (b) Repairing, testing, operation, constructing, modifying or altering flying craft and airboats shall be prohibited in all residential districts, including residential PUD districts and properties with a residential component in a mixed-use PUD district. Section 2. Amendment to section 656.1601, Ordinance Code. Section 656.1601, Ordinance Code, is hereby amended as follows: Chapter 656 zoning code *** Part 16. definitions Sec.656.1601. Definitions. *** (this does not apply to the aviation issue)Floor area means, except as specifically indicated in relation to particular districts and uses, the sum of the gross horizontal area of several floors of a building measured from the exterior faces of the exterior wall or from the centerline of the walls separating two buildings, excluding attic areas with a headroom of less than seven feet, unenclosed stairs or fire escapes, elevator structures, cooling towers, areas devoted to air conditioning, ventilating, heating or other building machinery and equipment, parking structures and basements space where the ceiling is not more than an average of 48 inches above the general finished and grade level of the adjacent portion of the lot. (this does apply to the aviation issue)Flying craft means any vehicle designed for navigation in the air or through outer space, including but not limited to airplanes, helicopters and hot air balloons. *** Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective upon signature by the mayor or upon becoming effective without the mayor's signature. Form approved: /a/ Dylan T. Reingold Office of General Counsel Legislation Prepared by: Dylan Reingold |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
moving is probably the only option cause there are no hangers in this
town(duval county). everyone who has found a hanger did so in another county. besides, homebuilt means just that. built at home. who wants to drive 40 miles to pop a few rivets? and btw, the individual who was the receipiant of this unneeded law making, has spent $k or dollars on getting this resolved in court, to no avail. initially, they tried to ticket him for zoning rules about vehicles, junk and what ever else they could think of, and he was doing pretty good at proving them wrong in court, using faa definitions of what the parts and pieces really were. unfortunately, it worked against him because after the city council amassed enough of his information about what he was actually doing, they had the ammunition to write the amendment to shut him down. Don W wrote: Sounds like someone needs to talk with their city council to figure out what the real issues are and try to reach a compromise such that everyone can be happy. Getting ****ed off and ignoring your neighbor's concerns doesn't work well. If they were working in their closed garage and not making a lot of noise, then no one would even know what they were doing, and it would not be a concern. Now their only choice is to rent a hangar with some buddies, or move to another town. Like they say: "you can't fight city hall" Don W. greatav8or wrote: some disturbing news was revealed at the last eaa mtg, when one of the members got up and passed out a copy of the latest city ordinance, amending what a residential dweller could do and have at their dwelling. enclosed is a copy of the admendment. the interesting point is how specifically the homebuilder was targeted, without ever being mentioned in the doucument. the part about the airboats was just an oportunity for the council members who have a problem with airboaters, to jump on board for a free ride. the disturbing issue is how the whole thing was put togeather with the most obscure notification imaginable. it was published in a local financial paper that has minimal circulation in the mainstream populace(the name escapes me at the moment.), however, it qualifies as public notice media. now! the ripple effect. joe flyer has been working on his $30k plus kit for the last however many years and now finds out he has a garage of illegal junk, that he can never finish, legally, due to the stroke of a pen. if u read it closely, u realize it includes model planes also. so now all the hobby shops can no longer sell model air plane kits to residents of the city(which btw, includes all the county, since the city limits is the county line.(makes the police and sheriff depts, one and the same.) the individual responsible for causing this piece of trash ordinance, is an eaa chapt member who lives next door to a busy-body that can't stand to see him working on his project at his home. due to here relentless resentment of his activites next door, he has paid numerous fines and court costs for not removing his project from his property. this new amendment is the final straw to shut him down. it would be curious to know as to how she found a receptive ear on the city council, to pen and pass such discriminatory legislation. fore warned is fore armed. don't let this happen in your town. Introduced by Council Member Lake Ray and amended on the floor of the council: Ordinance 2006-543-e An ordinance amending chapter 656 (zoning code), part 4 (supplementary regulations), subpart b (miscellaneous regulations), ordinance code, establishing section 656.420 (parking, storage, construction and repair of flying craft and airboats in residential districts, and amending part 16 (definitions), section 656.1601 (definitions, ordinance code to include a definition for flying craft; providing an effective date. Whereas, parking or storing flying craft and airboats in unenclosed spaces, including a carport, is not an operation in keeping with the character of a residential neighborhood, and Whereas, repairing, testing, operating, constructing, modifying or altering flying aircraft and airboats anywhere on a residential lot is not an operation in keeping with the character of a residential neighborhood, now thereof. Be it ordained by the council of the city of Jacksonville: Section 1. Creation of section 656.420, chapter 656 ordinance code. Chapter 656 (zoning code), part 4 (supplementary regulations), ordinance code is amended to create a new section 656.420 (parking, storage, repair and operation flying craft and airboats in residential districts) to read as follows: Chapter 656 zoning code *** Part 4. Supplementary Regulations Subpart A. Performance standards and development criteria *** Sec. 656.420. Parking, storage, repair and operation of flying craft and airboats in residential districts. (a) Flying craft and airboats shall not be parked or stored, other than in completely enclosed buildings, on residentially-zoned property, including residential PUD districts and properties with a residential component in a mixed-use PUD district. Airboats may however, be parked or stored in the water adjacent to, on docking facilities of, or in a yard fronting a navigable waterbody of, a residential PUD district and a property in the residential portion of a mixed-use PUD district. (b) Repairing, testing, operation, constructing, modifying or altering flying craft and airboats shall be prohibited in all residential districts, including residential PUD districts and properties with a residential component in a mixed-use PUD district. Section 2. Amendment to section 656.1601, Ordinance Code. Section 656.1601, Ordinance Code, is hereby amended as follows: Chapter 656 zoning code *** Part 16. definitions Sec.656.1601. Definitions. *** (this does not apply to the aviation issue)Floor area means, except as specifically indicated in relation to particular districts and uses, the sum of the gross horizontal area of several floors of a building measured from the exterior faces of the exterior wall or from the centerline of the walls separating two buildings, excluding attic areas with a headroom of less than seven feet, unenclosed stairs or fire escapes, elevator structures, cooling towers, areas devoted to air conditioning, ventilating, heating or other building machinery and equipment, parking structures and basements space where the ceiling is not more than an average of 48 inches above the general finished and grade level of the adjacent portion of the lot. (this does apply to the aviation issue)Flying craft means any vehicle designed for navigation in the air or through outer space, including but not limited to airplanes, helicopters and hot air balloons. *** Section 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective upon signature by the mayor or upon becoming effective without the mayor's signature. Form approved: /a/ Dylan T. Reingold Office of General Counsel Legislation Prepared by: Dylan Reingold |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi guys, My name is Wayne McCullough and I am a current EAA chapter president. My homeowners insurance was cancelled because of a current Kolb project being worked on at my home....23 acres in Effingham County Georgia........No runway allowed, no storage of aircraft of any kind...... And then I read this, and Duval County is Jacksonville, Florida........Amazing what the politicians can do behind closed doors..... Eaa national has not responded to any of my e-mails as of yet.....All of this I found out last Monday...... Been doing experimentals for 12 years, and I did not know I was not living in America anymore. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
(a) Flying craft and airboats shall not be parked or stored, other
than in completely enclosed buildings, on residentially-zoned property, including residential PUD districts and properties with a residential component in a mixed-use PUD district. Airboats may however, be parked or stored in the water adjacent to, on docking facilities of, or in a yard fronting a navigable waterbody of, a residential PUD district and a property in the residential portion of a mixed-use PUD district. (b) Repairing, testing, operation, constructing, modifying or altering flying craft and airboats shall be prohibited in all residential districts, including residential PUD districts and properties with a residential component in a mixed-use PUD district. If I were a lawyer (and I'm not...don't even play one on TV), I would push the equal protection under the law ideas. First, take issue with their definition of just what is "keeping with the nature of a residential neighborhood". And then bring up the issue of people changing their own car's oil or airfilter, or even painting a lawn chair. Personally, I see this as a continued trend in the transformation of the American public from citizens to consumers. (You're only allowed to do it if they sell a kit for it at Home Depot.) -- This is by far the hardest lesson about freedom. It goes against instinct, and morality, to just sit back and watch people make mistakes. We want to help them, which means control them and their decisions, but in doing so we actually hurt them (and ourselves)." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I read the same thing Jim, but I have the question of:
greatav8or, how do you know all this information? Are you the person in question? Lou |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wonder what the city/county concerns that are
leading to the regulations are. Also, it would be interesting to hear about your insurance companies concerns. Was your home insurance canceled because working on aircraft violated the policy terms, or because storing the aircraft violated county zoning law? I wholeheartedly agree that our city/county governments are passing ordinances that interfere with a persons right to "pursuit of happiness" all the time. Where I live, the local codes are fairly draconian due to the city starting as a "retirement" community. We can not even store a boat in our back yard legally, and the code enforcement people issue tickets for leaving your trash cans out at the street too long (more than 24 hours). Still, the city responds to reasonable requests for variances from the city ordinances, and we do elect our city councilmen and mayor every two years. A resolution to the restriction might start with contacting your local city/county politician as follows: "Jim, it recently came to my attention that the city has an ordinance prohibiting working on or storing aircraft at a residential property. I would like to work on building a small experimental aircraft in my garage, so do you know what the city's concerns that led to this ordinance are?" Once you understand their concerns, you can work out something that will most likely get you a variance, and let you do what you want to. "If I were to do all of the work inside my garage, and make sure that the noise didn't disturb my neighbors do you think I could get a variance for this project?" You might even have to purchase and install some type of acoustic absorber in the garage to bring the noise down to where the neighbors would tolerate it. "I own this property and will do what I damn well please on it" will not get you very far even in rural areas. It sounded like the ordinance that the first poster was referring to got passed specifically because a home builder got in a ****ing contest with a neighbor, and the city sided with the neighbor. Don W. blackbird wrote: Hi guys, My name is Wayne McCullough and I am a current EAA chapter president. My homeowners insurance was cancelled because of a current Kolb project being worked on at my home....23 acres in Effingham County Georgia........No runway allowed, no storage of aircraft of any kind...... And then I read this, and Duval County is Jacksonville, Florida........Amazing what the politicians can do behind closed doors..... Eaa national has not responded to any of my e-mails as of yet.....All of this I found out last Monday...... Been doing experimentals for 12 years, and I did not know I was not living in America anymore. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lou wrote:
I read the same thing Jim, but I have the question of: greatav8or, how do you know all this information? Are you the person in question? The first paragraph (a) addresses parking and storage, and that has the "completely closed" clause. The second paragraph (b) addresses working on your airplane, and that is prohibited. I'm a little surprised that something like this could be passed in Jax FL. I lived there up until a couple years ago, and I didn't think of city hall as... well, there's no nice way to state what I think of this. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
no! but if i had known how much the individual, that is involved, had
been spending on legal fees, i would have contributed to his cause so that this sort of thing would have not gotten as far as it did. it all comes back to the fact that "people get the kind of govenment they deserve". if u do not hold elected officials to close daily scruitney, they will screw u at the first chance. Lou wrote: I read the same thing Jim, but I have the question of: greatav8or, how do you know all this information? Are you the person in question? Lou |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Don W" wrote in message . net... Sounds like someone needs to talk with their city council to figure out what the real issues are and try to reach a compromise such that everyone can be happy. Getting ****ed off and ignoring your neighbor's concerns doesn't work well. If they were working in their closed garage and not making a lot of noise, then no one would even know what they were doing, and it would not be a concern. I read it as only prohibiting it, if the craft was an unenclosed garage. No? -- Jim in NC |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Bakersfield Municipal Airport May Be Sold To Developers | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 3 | November 23rd 05 03:00 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aerobatics | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
General Aviation Legal Defense Fund | Dr. Guenther Eichhorn | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | May 11th 04 10:43 PM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |