![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, john smith wrote: The 195 yoke mounting was nice because it hung down over the front of the yoke. This kept the cent of mass low and did not interfer with control operation. If you had a yoke mounted timer built in, you couldn't use the timer, however. I found the RAM suction cup to be a very flexible mounting option. I prefer to place the mount in the lower corner of the windscreen. This places it where it will not interfer while scanning for traffic and places it in view when scanning the instrument panel. I don't know, my 396 hangs down in front of the yoke just fine (Cherokee), and does not obstruct my DG the way the 195 did; and worse, the buttons on the 195 were positioned at the top of the unit, which made using it in flight somewhat awkward. If I had an airplane where the yoke itself obstructed the GPS mount, I'd probably consider a RAM yoke mount, or simply move the unit to a suction-cup or other type of mount. JKG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Jim Macklin | Piloting | 12 | February 22nd 06 10:09 PM |
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Bob Gardner | Piloting | 18 | February 22nd 06 08:25 PM |
Amateur Review of the Garmin GPSMAP 296 GPS | Rhett | Products | 10 | April 29th 04 06:57 AM |
F/A-22 | Mike Marron | Military Aviation | 10 | October 21st 03 08:05 PM |
France Bans the Term 'E-Mail' | bsh | Military Aviation | 38 | July 26th 03 03:18 PM |