![]()  | 
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. | 
		
			
  | 	
	
	
		
		|||||||
| 
		 | 
	Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
| 
	 | 
| 
		 
			 
			#1  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
The real value of nuclear weapons is the threat of using them, NOT actually  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	using them. The Navy boomer fleet said if they ever had to launch SLBMs they would have failed their purpose - convincing the Soviet Union and Red China they could not "win" a nuclear war. Unfortunately, with death-wish terrorists there may be no such deterrence! end "Moe" Moe@MoesBar wrote in message ... ignoring the political implications of crossing the imaginary threshold or tripwire regarding usage of tactical nukes. would it not afford the IDF a significant advantage to execute strikes using enchanced radiation packages ? minimal collateral damage to infrastructure, while still achieving the goal of defeating the enemy that has dug itself in. place the strike packages on a few F-15E's, or GLCM's and sanitize the target areas of hezbollah combatants with less losses than a direct engagement of ground troops.  | 
| 
		 
			 
			#2  
			 
            
			
			
			
		 
		
		
	 | 
|||
		
		
  | 
|||
| 
	
	
		
			
			 
You can be assured that all the Arab are well aware that if Israel were to  
		
	
		
		
		
		
		
	
		 
		
	
	
	about to go under, they could expect to receive several nukes on their major cities not to mention "holy sites". Mecca and Medina would probably cease to exist. Would Israel really push the button? Heck I don't know, but neither do the Arabs. "W. D. Allen" wrote in message ... The real value of nuclear weapons is the threat of using them, NOT actually using them. The Navy boomer fleet said if they ever had to launch SLBMs they would have failed their purpose - convincing the Soviet Union and Red China they could not "win" a nuclear war. Unfortunately, with death-wish terrorists there may be no such deterrence! end "Moe" Moe@MoesBar wrote in message ... ignoring the political implications of crossing the imaginary threshold or tripwire regarding usage of tactical nukes. would it not afford the IDF a significant advantage to execute strikes using enchanced radiation packages ? minimal collateral damage to infrastructure, while still achieving the goal of defeating the enemy that has dug itself in. place the strike packages on a few F-15E's, or GLCM's and sanitize the target areas of hezbollah combatants with less losses than a direct engagement of ground troops.  | 
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
		
  | 
	
		
  | 
			 
			Similar Threads
		 | 
	||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post | 
| Lyc. O-360 cylinder question | JB | Owning | 13 | November 27th 04 10:32 PM | 
| Handheld battery question | RobsSanta | General Aviation | 8 | September 19th 04 04:07 PM | 
| A question on Airworthiness Inspection | Dave S | Home Built | 1 | August 10th 04 06:07 AM | 
| Question | Charles S | Home Built | 4 | April 5th 04 10:10 PM | 
| Partnership Question | Harry Gordon | Owning | 4 | August 17th 03 12:23 AM |