![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 02:49:14 GMT, Jose
wrote in :: Seriously, skim the document, and just read the interesting parts; don't neglect the appendices. It's easy to get a feel for who is trying to get hold of the government's purse strings without congressional oversight. http://www.gao.gov/htext/d05333sp.html The thing that kills the normal give and take of free economics is a middleman who calls the shots. There are at lease multiple providers of health care. The administration has twisted reality to the point of saying the government is free to abnegate its control of our nation's navigable airspace by declaring ATC to be "inherently commercial." Under President Clinton, air traffic services were defined as "inherently governmental," meaning that they could not be provided by the private sector. In June 2002, President Bush issued Executive Order 13264, which revised that definition and opened the way for FAA to contract with private companies for services on a test basis, as directed by OMB Circular A-76. The performance-based Air Traffic Organization (ATO) was created in February 2004 to improve the management of the modernization effort. In February 2004, FAA merged its Office of Air Traffic Services, Office of Research and Acquisitions, and Free Flight Program Office to create the ATO. I wonder how the USAF feels about user fees? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Larry Dighera wrote: I wonder how the USAF feels about user fees? Given that the USAF (and Navy and Army) provides some ATC services in the NAS, I anticipate that the FAA will be told to consider it a wash. To put it another way, ain't no way the DoD will take it out of hide. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ATC exists because it is a military service, it is just
available to the few thousand airline aircraft and in most cases it is forced upon general aviation. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P "Bob Noel" wrote in message ... | In article , | Larry Dighera wrote: | | I wonder how the USAF feels about user fees? | | Given that the USAF (and Navy and Army) provides some ATC services | in the NAS, I anticipate that the FAA will be told to consider it a wash. | To put it another way, ain't no way the DoD will take it out of hide. | | -- | Bob Noel | Looking for a sig the | lawyers will hate | |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:Gq1zg.84634$ZW3.44653@dukeread04... : ATC exists because it is a military service, it is just : available to the few thousand airline aircraft and in most : cases it is forced upon general aviation. : : : -- : James H. Macklin : ATP,CFI,A&P : A bit like NASA and the space shuttle... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Air Force radar is aimed out over the oceans, the FAA
radar is used to detect and vector traffic within the boarders. If there is a national emergency [say nuclear war] the FAA centers will stay in operation for the military and all other airplanes will be grounded. The communications system was built to do this and survive a nuke attack. To justify the costs, it was used to control more and more general aviation aircraft by the simple tool, restrict more airspace to aircraft that don't participate. It isn't all bad or a waste, but a lot of the expense of owning an airplane is transponders, ELTs [a Congressman's plane was lost in Colorado and Congress passed a law, not the FAA], positive control [Class A and B], encoders above 10,000, everything is small potatoes to the government, but it costs a lot of money to comply with all the rules and then to maintain the equipment. ".Blueskies." wrote in message . net... | | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:Gq1zg.84634$ZW3.44653@dukeread04... | : ATC exists because it is a military service, it is just | : available to the few thousand airline aircraft and in most | : cases it is forced upon general aviation. | : | : | : -- | : James H. Macklin | : ATP,CFI,A&P | : | | A bit like NASA and the space shuttle... | | |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 0Z2zg.84638$ZW3.70789@dukeread04,
"Jim Macklin" wrote: The Air Force radar is aimed out over the oceans, That's the long range air defense radars. The USAF operates a number of RAPCONs with terminal radars | -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
True, generally in areas not served by airlines at the time
the facility was built. Military radar is mostly used for continental defense, with some ATC functions, as you fly through their airspace, FAA TC will hand you off. But the entire FAA ATC system is part of the national defense, just as the Interstate Highway system was created by Ike as the National Defense Highway System. "Bob Noel" wrote in message ... | In article 0Z2zg.84638$ZW3.70789@dukeread04, | "Jim Macklin" wrote: | | The Air Force radar is aimed out over the oceans, | | That's the long range air defense radars. | | The USAF operates a number of RAPCONs with terminal | radars | | | | | | -- | Bob Noel | Looking for a sig the | lawyers will hate | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Should a W&B list gross weight? | Andrew Gideon | Owning | 24 | October 21st 05 11:03 PM |
Boeing Boondoggle | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 77 | September 15th 04 02:39 AM |
more radial fans like fw190? | jt | Military Aviation | 51 | August 28th 04 04:22 AM |
RV-7a baggage area | David Smith | Home Built | 32 | December 15th 03 04:08 AM |