![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
After a little more research I found batteries are aroud $300 / kg,
giving about 150 Wh / kg. This seems to be for quite a few different brands so I would imagine that is a reasonable baseline price. This doesn't take into account chargers or controllers for the power source. What type of HG wing are you trying to power, and what type of harness are you modifying? Will they accept a power-unit ? Sorry I was a bit unlcear in my initial post. I am not actually in the process of building this, just throwing it out as a hypothetical (at the moment). The HG wing would just be a typical one for these calculations. Same with harness weight. Modifying a harness to add an engine on the back would be an issue, i agree. Will the purpose of the power unit be to take off and climb out, or just as a sustainer between widely spread thermals? Just for self-launch.. Why electric and not gasoline? Site restrictions? Noise? Objections from other HG pilots? Yes noise is an issue. I also feel 'solid-state' type machines like electric engines are more reliable than petrol, due to only a single moving part. It would also mean the fuel source could be spread out in some interesting ways over the aircraft. So to restate some of the calculations using the new values: One kg of batteries will give you 150 W for an hour of use. Keeping a 250 pound hang glider fly level needs about 2000 W. You could fly level for about 5 mins with 1 kg of battery for $300. Each kg would give you an extra 5 mins of level time. Don't batteries seem appealing these days with those numbers? Especially for small engines like hang glider ones as you only need them for a short amount of time, ie. to get equivalent height of a cliff launch but from your paddock. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I do not want to spool the fun here, but ... whichs formulas did you
use to get those figures? I used some basic formulas and totally get other figures. OK, I assume a bad efficienty of the prop and took it for safety at 50%. I get for 10,5 glide ratio, 1300 N total weight, 16 m2 surface, climb rate of 2m/s --- needed power of about 10 kW! I used some rough formulas found in a book which tells the basic calculations rather very easy. So ... my estimate might be a bit rough. But the difference between your estimate and mine is soo large that I fear that one of us is ... euh ... wrong. Ok, I am not a engineer. But I wanted to follow this item because it interests me TOTALLY! If we would succeed in making a possible kit for hanggliders we would at last have a way to get airborne at soaring height with a system that is more reliable and less annoying for the surroundings. AT LAST a way to counter those endless complaints that get small airfields closed by orders from communities. And ... at last a way to get airborne without the need for a entire club and the need for a official airstrip. Please, guys, continue this search for a electrical powered hangglider. I keep following it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nestofdragons wrote:
I do not want to spool the fun here, but ... whichs formulas did you use to get those figures? They were from he http://www.ornithopter.org/forum/sho...98&postcount=3 . Even though the question asked on that page was regarding flapped flight the answer was given in general terms of energy needed. It ignored the 80% engine efficiency and the propeller efficiency which I thought was also 80%. I used some basic formulas and totally get other figures. OK, I assume a bad efficienty of the prop and took it for safety at 50%. I get for 10,5 glide ratio, 1300 N total weight, 16 m2 surface, climb rate of 2m/s --- needed power of about 10 kW! Those are the approximate figures that were used for the calculations. I should have doubled (approximately) the final result to allow for engine & propeller. So I would guesstimate 3 kW for level flight. For climbing at 2 m/s I think the power needed would need to be doubled again to 6 or 7 kW. So perhaps a more accurate cost calculation would be: 7000 W needed = 45 kg of batteries at 150 kWh per kg = 0.75 kg for each 1 minute of flight = $250 for each minute of flight, at about a kilo per minute $2500 for ten minutes seems a bit steep so I can understand why manufacturers might not be making these yet. The gasoline engines for hang gliders (including harness) are around $5000 total. A harness by iteself is $500 - $1000. An Electric engine + prop is around $500 - $1000. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
45 kg of batteries alone? What would the total weight of the system
be? I'm thinking you are going to quickly run out of wing options. I hook in at 210 lbs. (94kg) and have flown a Wills Wing Falcon 209 & 229 (sq ft of wing). My glide ratios from a 65 ft training hill were about 7:1 for the 209, and 8:1 for the 229. With an extra 90 lbs of motor and batteries, you'll need a much larger wing. I havn't researched the subject in a while, but most of the available wing designs have an upper hook-in weight of 250 lbs (111kg). And most HG pilots fly a much smaller wing (150-175 sq ft) since they mountain or tow launch. Assuming you / your market will buy a wing sized to fly with power, then a tandem training wing should work. I don't remember exactly, but I believe I did my tandem training in a Wills Wing Condor. Now here's another problem. Your wing will need to lift you and the powerplant at a speed slower than you can run with the glider, powerplant, harness, and any other gear resting on your shoulders. I can make launch runs at about 10 mph. Any faster, and the glider will likely pitch over and nose-plant itself. That ain't fun. Trust me, I've done it once or twice and narrowly avoided broken bones. Otherwise, you're talking about some sort of wheel launch. I meant to ask you in the last post, are you currently an HG pilot? If so, where from and what rating do you hold? If not, are there any schools near you? Even an introductory weedend of foot-launching would shed a lot of light on the piloting aspects of the issue. Harry Frey USHPGA #79944 Kicenuik Batso Frey Stormy Petrel 2, 2a, & 3 Wills Wing Falcon 209 & 229 Wills Wing Condor Wright 1902 glider |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Electric Glider | Mal | Soaring | 20 | November 2nd 05 10:46 PM |
Aerodynamics of carrying water | Gene Whitt | Soaring | 54 | October 19th 05 07:24 PM |
Bad publicity | David Starer | Soaring | 18 | March 8th 04 03:57 PM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |
I wish I'd never got into this... | Kevin Neave | Soaring | 32 | September 19th 03 12:18 PM |