![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Larry Dighera wrote: Responding with "looking" acknowledges the transmission and tells the controller than I don't have the traffic but I'm not blowing it off. I agree with your reasoning, but regulations only instruct the controller to provide the VFR traffic advisory; they don't require the controller to be concerned if you see the traffic or not. That said, it has been my experience, that a controller will make an effort to continue advising the traffic's position (if it is a factor) until the pilot reports "in sight." Actually, I mostly fly IFR, so my comments were from that perspective. It's still "see & avoid" under IFR in VMC, but the controller is off the hook if you spot the traffic and are told to maintain visual separation. It's a benefit to the controller and usually, to you as well. JKG |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |