![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
John,
Thankyou for a really useful contribution. Putting an alerting system in my glider gives ME useful information that I can act on. Installing a transponder alone gives me no such information, although it MIGHT give second-hand info via FAA alerts to other traffic, or MIGHT alert other traffic to my presence if they have and use a CAS. And $500 is reasonably affordable, whereas the total cost of an installed and legalized transponder is much less so. Part of the present confusion is the proliferation of different technical partial solutions to the problem - transponders [mode C or S], TCAS, ADS-B, FLARM etc etc etc. Without standardization on one system, none can reach their potential. Without wishing to decry any of these systems, each one adds complexity and to some extent increases heads-down cockpit workload [even if only to note your battery drainage from time to time]. Heads-out situation awareness is a desirable state to aim for and should take preference over the other interests of techies. Who would like to use existing technology to come up with one fit-and-forget unit that would act as a flight recorder, GPS-enabled ELT, mainly-passive alert and transmit-on-alert-only transponder ? But at the end of the day, even with very good warning of an impending collision, the limited maneuverability of both a glider and a high-speed aircraft means that you need to put an eyeball on the threat to have a hope of avoiding it. We drive highways every day in reasonable safety - but just think about doing that with your eyes closed and your trusted passenger telling you where the other traffic is. Ian At 13:30 30 August 2006, Jcarlyle wrote: Last week, before the Minden midair, I reviewed Collision Avoidance Systems with the intent of putting one in my transponder-less ASW-19. I was interested in such a system because my glider club lies inside the Mode C veil of PHL, because an active military air base is 5 miles away, and because there are several airways that lie within several miles of us. Here's the result of my research; I hope it might be of help to others. Zaon MRX - This was the one I bought. Pros - shows threat distance and height; receives civilian signals A, C, S and 3/A, as well as military signals X, Y and 2; alerts are visual and aural (high pitched beeps); uses internal power (but can use aircraft power); is the smallest system available; can be panel mounted with remote antenna. Cons - does not show threat direction; doesn't output threats via RS232 to PocketPC type devices. List price $499 Zaon XRX - This is the one I really liked. Pros - shows threat direction as well as distance and height; receives civilian signals A, C, S and 3/A, and also military signals X, Y and 2; alerts are visual and aural (synthesized voice); outputs threats via RS232 to PocketPC type devices. Cons - needs aircraft power; fairly large and tall, and must be mounted on the glare shield. Supposedly Zaon will offer a panel mount version with remote antenna in the future. List price $1795 Proxalert R5 - I rejected this one. Pros - shows threat distance and height; shows squawk code of three threats (but threats combined if same squawk); alerts are visual and aural (high pitched beeps); outputs threats via RS232 to PocketPC type devices; can be panel mounted with remote antenna. Cons - Combines threats with same squawk code on same line showing closest threat distance, and flip-flops threat altitude; needs aircraft power; only receives civilian A, C and S signals; fairly large and hangs over glare shield lip. I also was turned off by the web site, when I see poor English in sales literature I can't help but wonder if the engineering was also done carelessly. List price $795 Monroy ADT-300 - I rejected this one. Pros - shows threat distance and height (but only if you have an altitude encoding transponder); alerts are visual and aural (synthesized voice); second smallest available; can be panel mounted with remote antenna. Cons - Needs altitude encoding transponder to show threat height; needs aircraft power; only receives civilian A, C and S signals; doesn't output threats via RS232 to PocketPC type devices. List price $795 Please note that this list is biased towards my own needs, in a quiet glider with no transponder, operating with civilian and military aircraft. You might have different requirements, so do check out the manufacturer's sites for fuller specs and manuals: http://www.zaonflight.com/ http://www.monroyaero.com/ http://www.proxalert.com/ A good single reference page to many Collision Avoidance Systems is he http://www.avionix.com/collis.html There are also some (fairly old) threads on RAS on this subject; you might wish to search for them. Be careful up there! -John (I have absolutely no connection or financial interest with any of the companies named in this message). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Collision Avoidance Systems | [email protected] | Products | 0 | May 21st 06 10:15 PM |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |