A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

How high is that cloud?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #4  
Old November 26th 04, 08:56 AM
Julian Scarfe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message
om...

Adiabatic lapse rate is 1C/1"Hg for moist air (depending on moisture
content) and 3C/1"Hg for dry air. 2C/1"Hg is a representative average
for somewhat moist but unsaturated air.


No, moist but unsaturated air has an adiabatic lapse rate of 3 degC (i.e.
the unsaturated adiabatic lapse rate). The difference between that and
saturated comes not from the amount of water vapor in the air as a mixing of
properties, but from the latent heat produced when the water vapor
condenses, which only happens when the air becomes saturated. It's not a
progression, but a sharp difference when the water vapor starts to condense.

Julian Scarfe


  #5  
Old November 26th 04, 03:53 PM
Andrew Sarangan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


That's interesting, but I find it strange that moisture content does not
change the adiabatic lapse rate. Moist air has a higher heat capacity than
dry air, so I would expect the adiabatic lapse rate of moist air (but
unsaturated) to be lower than dry air.




"Julian Scarfe" wrote in
:

"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message
om...

Adiabatic lapse rate is 1C/1"Hg for moist air (depending on moisture
content) and 3C/1"Hg for dry air. 2C/1"Hg is a representative average
for somewhat moist but unsaturated air.


No, moist but unsaturated air has an adiabatic lapse rate of 3 degC
(i.e. the unsaturated adiabatic lapse rate). The difference between
that and saturated comes not from the amount of water vapor in the air
as a mixing of properties, but from the latent heat produced when the
water vapor condenses, which only happens when the air becomes
saturated. It's not a progression, but a sharp difference when the
water vapor starts to condense.

Julian Scarfe



  #6  
Old November 26th 04, 05:44 PM
Mike Rapoport
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message
om...
"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
link.net...
2C per thousand has nothing to do with stability. In unsaturated air,
2C/1000 is stable. In saturated air 2C/1000 is unstable. 2C/1000 is
the
standard for calibrating altimeters, it has nothing to do with the real
atmosphere or stability.

Mike
MU-2


Adiabatic lapse rate is 1C/1"Hg for moist air (depending on moisture
content) and 3C/1"Hg for dry air. 2C/1"Hg is a representative average
for somewhat moist but unsaturated air. It is still a useful indicator
of stability. I would not discount is as a completely meaningless
number. It is a useful reference, just like 29.92" and 15C.


How can 2C/1000' tell you anything about stability? If the air is saturated
then 2C/1000 is unstable, absoluteley totally unstable. 2C/1000 in
saturated air is likely to be the inside of a thunderstorm. If the air is
unsaturated and the lapse rate is 3C/1000, the air is stable, totally stable
and smooth. 2C/1000 tells you nothing about stability unless you know
whether the air is saturated or not. The only numbers that tell you about
stability without knowing the vapor content are lapse rates above 3C/1000
(termed absolutely unstable) or below 1C/1000 (absolutely stable). Any
lapse rate between 1C and 3C/1000 is termed "conditionally stable".

Please explain how 2C/1000 is used in altimeter calibration. I did not
know altimeters had any temperature corrections.


Altimeters are preasure guages with a scale in feet. They assume a pressure
lapse rate with altitude and the pressure lapse rate that they use is ISA
whch assumes 15C at SL and 2C/1000'.

Mike
MU-2


  #7  
Old November 26th 04, 07:55 PM
Matt Whiting
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike Rapoport wrote:

"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message
om...


Please explain how 2C/1000 is used in altimeter calibration. I did not
know altimeters had any temperature corrections.



Altimeters are preasure guages with a scale in feet. They assume a pressure
lapse rate with altitude and the pressure lapse rate that they use is ISA
whch assumes 15C at SL and 2C/1000'.


Last I knew C was a unit of temperature, not pressure.

Matt

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
High Price of Flying Wires? PWK Home Built 34 October 8th 17 08:24 PM
Cloud Tops/bases forecast? David Instrument Flight Rules 4 October 20th 04 10:08 PM
Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! Bruce A. Frank Home Built 1 July 4th 04 07:28 PM
MT. DIABLO HIGH SCHOOL CONCORD, CA PHOTOS MT. DIABLO HIGH SCHOOL PHOTOS Home Built 1 October 13th 03 03:35 AM
High performance homebuilt in the UK NigelPocock Home Built 0 August 18th 03 08:35 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.