![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in
: On 24 Nov 2004 21:38:35 -0800, (Andrew Sarangan) wrote: Adiabatic lapse rate is 1C/1"Hg for moist air (depending on moisture content) and 3C/1"Hg for dry air. 2C/1"Hg is a representative average for somewhat moist but unsaturated air. It is still a useful indicator of stability. I would not discount is as a completely meaningless number. It is a useful reference, just like 29.92" and 15C. Adiabatic lapse rate never changes. It is not a useful indicator of stability. It tells you nothing about stability until you know the actual lapse rate of the air mass in question. You should read up on lapse rates. There is dry adiabatic lapse rate, moist (saturated) adiabatic lapse rate, average adiabatic lapse rate and even more obscure ones like superadiabatic lapse rate and autoconvective lapse rate. It is definitely not a constant, but the commonly accepted average lapse rate is 2C/1000ft. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message
om... Adiabatic lapse rate is 1C/1"Hg for moist air (depending on moisture content) and 3C/1"Hg for dry air. 2C/1"Hg is a representative average for somewhat moist but unsaturated air. No, moist but unsaturated air has an adiabatic lapse rate of 3 degC (i.e. the unsaturated adiabatic lapse rate). The difference between that and saturated comes not from the amount of water vapor in the air as a mixing of properties, but from the latent heat produced when the water vapor condenses, which only happens when the air becomes saturated. It's not a progression, but a sharp difference when the water vapor starts to condense. Julian Scarfe |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() That's interesting, but I find it strange that moisture content does not change the adiabatic lapse rate. Moist air has a higher heat capacity than dry air, so I would expect the adiabatic lapse rate of moist air (but unsaturated) to be lower than dry air. "Julian Scarfe" wrote in : "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message om... Adiabatic lapse rate is 1C/1"Hg for moist air (depending on moisture content) and 3C/1"Hg for dry air. 2C/1"Hg is a representative average for somewhat moist but unsaturated air. No, moist but unsaturated air has an adiabatic lapse rate of 3 degC (i.e. the unsaturated adiabatic lapse rate). The difference between that and saturated comes not from the amount of water vapor in the air as a mixing of properties, but from the latent heat produced when the water vapor condenses, which only happens when the air becomes saturated. It's not a progression, but a sharp difference when the water vapor starts to condense. Julian Scarfe |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message om... "Mike Rapoport" wrote in message link.net... 2C per thousand has nothing to do with stability. In unsaturated air, 2C/1000 is stable. In saturated air 2C/1000 is unstable. 2C/1000 is the standard for calibrating altimeters, it has nothing to do with the real atmosphere or stability. Mike MU-2 Adiabatic lapse rate is 1C/1"Hg for moist air (depending on moisture content) and 3C/1"Hg for dry air. 2C/1"Hg is a representative average for somewhat moist but unsaturated air. It is still a useful indicator of stability. I would not discount is as a completely meaningless number. It is a useful reference, just like 29.92" and 15C. How can 2C/1000' tell you anything about stability? If the air is saturated then 2C/1000 is unstable, absoluteley totally unstable. 2C/1000 in saturated air is likely to be the inside of a thunderstorm. If the air is unsaturated and the lapse rate is 3C/1000, the air is stable, totally stable and smooth. 2C/1000 tells you nothing about stability unless you know whether the air is saturated or not. The only numbers that tell you about stability without knowing the vapor content are lapse rates above 3C/1000 (termed absolutely unstable) or below 1C/1000 (absolutely stable). Any lapse rate between 1C and 3C/1000 is termed "conditionally stable". Please explain how 2C/1000 is used in altimeter calibration. I did not know altimeters had any temperature corrections. Altimeters are preasure guages with a scale in feet. They assume a pressure lapse rate with altitude and the pressure lapse rate that they use is ISA whch assumes 15C at SL and 2C/1000'. Mike MU-2 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Rapoport wrote:
"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message om... Please explain how 2C/1000 is used in altimeter calibration. I did not know altimeters had any temperature corrections. Altimeters are preasure guages with a scale in feet. They assume a pressure lapse rate with altitude and the pressure lapse rate that they use is ISA whch assumes 15C at SL and 2C/1000'. Last I knew C was a unit of temperature, not pressure. Matt |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High Price of Flying Wires? | PWK | Home Built | 34 | October 8th 17 08:24 PM |
Cloud Tops/bases forecast? | David | Instrument Flight Rules | 4 | October 20th 04 10:08 PM |
Fwd: [BD4] Source of HIGH CHTs on O-320 and O-360 FOUND! | Bruce A. Frank | Home Built | 1 | July 4th 04 07:28 PM |
MT. DIABLO HIGH SCHOOL CONCORD, CA PHOTOS | MT. DIABLO HIGH SCHOOL PHOTOS | Home Built | 1 | October 13th 03 03:35 AM |
High performance homebuilt in the UK | NigelPocock | Home Built | 0 | August 18th 03 08:35 PM |