![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
From the Lycoming website:
"To reduce spark plug fouling and keep the cylinder cooling within the recommended 50o per minute limit, the mixture should be left at the lean setting used for cruise and then richened gradually during descent from altitude. " From my experience it's just the first 100 degrees you have to worry about, so that is the first two minutes. After that you can pretty much pull the throttle back. But the key is that 50 degrees per minute on the CHT. Lycoming says not to exceed 50 degrees per minute of cooling. Planning descents in mountainous terrain is not trivial. You do not want to shock cool and you do not want to be above Va due to turbulence. Takes some planning. As for terrain. If you are navigating VFR and you can't see the terrain, you shouldn't be flying in the mountains. I have done PLENTY of mountain flying in Colorado mountains, all VFR, but not at night. Of course there are exceptions. If you fly above the highest obstacle then you are ok. And if you are on an IFR flight plan and obeying the terrain clearance rules you are of course ok. Both of these are hard to do in the west without oxygen. Some pilots HAVE designed their own terrain clearance waypoints by flying in the daytime and creating user waypoints with altitudes along their saved route. I never wanted to play that game, but in theory it should work if followed carefully. Familiarity with the route helps a lot. Be careful out there. One other item. There is a large amount of difference in the darkeness at night. With a full moon and snow cover, one can see quite well at night. Over heavily populated areas the ground lights create enough light to be able to make out most of the terrain. So like in all things, it all depends. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ups.com... Mxsmanic wrote: RST Engineering writes: Oh, PLEEZE keep doing that. My kids need college money and I want a Hawaii vacation next year. I make a lot of money from shock-cooled engine work. What is a shock-cooled engine? Something that doesn't happen in MS flight sim. PLEASE STOP FEEDING THIS FRIKKIN' TROLL!!!!!!!!!!!! Jim |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rob" wrote:
I fly out of DVT also. Me too. snip The little bumps right off the east end of Deer Valley can be quite intimidating at night (and take note of this current NOTAM: DVT 08/021 DVT HILL UNKN .5 E LGTS OTS TIL 0609302359). I keep a feel for flying around them in the dark by regularly practicing touch-and-go's at sunset. Get a few landings in while they're still clearly visible, and you'll have a feel for their height and location relative to your departure profile as it gets dark. On a high DA day the bumps off the end of 7L (the short north runway) are very much a factor. Yes, not a good airport for night operations. The PAPI's are your friends on 25L/R. If I'm just doing night currency stop and go's, I'll use the south runway, (or go over to Glendale!) Mike |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Whiting opined
Dan wrote: My early years of flying were spent in the Midwest where as long as you were over 2000 MSL, there were very few obstacles to hit and no terrain. Now that I have moved out West (Phoenix) I am increasingly paranoid about hitting terrain at night. Choosing a cruise altitude is easy (well above anything even close to your route). However, what I worry about is my letdown to pattern altitude at the destination airport as well as departure. Short of filing IFR (which carries with it Oxygen requirements for some local MEAs) what other strategies do you all use? Any "systems" or tricks to share, or is it pretty much just look at the sectional and make a plan? I tend to fly IFR at night so you can always fly a full approach if you are really concerned. Often the light is good enough that you can still see the mountains and other such obstacles. Study the sectional well and know where the obstacles are located and you should be find. Or just fly an approach VFR. Get flight folowing if you are worried about IFR traffic. -ash Cthulhu in 2005! Why wait for nature? |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ash Wyllie wrote:
Matt Whiting opined Dan wrote: My early years of flying were spent in the Midwest where as long as you were over 2000 MSL, there were very few obstacles to hit and no terrain. Now that I have moved out West (Phoenix) I am increasingly paranoid about hitting terrain at night. Choosing a cruise altitude is easy (well above anything even close to your route). However, what I worry about is my letdown to pattern altitude at the destination airport as well as departure. Short of filing IFR (which carries with it Oxygen requirements for some local MEAs) what other strategies do you all use? Any "systems" or tricks to share, or is it pretty much just look at the sectional and make a plan? I tend to fly IFR at night so you can always fly a full approach if you are really concerned. Often the light is good enough that you can still see the mountains and other such obstacles. Study the sectional well and know where the obstacles are located and you should be find. Or just fly an approach VFR. Get flight folowing if you are worried about IFR traffic. You might want to read the subject before posting. Saves the embarrassment of making a completely irrelevant post. Matt |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Matt Whiting opined
Ash Wyllie wrote: Matt Whiting opined Dan wrote: My early years of flying were spent in the Midwest where as long as you were over 2000 MSL, there were very few obstacles to hit and no terrain. Now that I have moved out West (Phoenix) I am increasingly paranoid about hitting terrain at night. Choosing a cruise altitude is easy (well above anything even close to your route). However, what I worry about is my letdown to pattern altitude at the destination airport as well as departure. Short of filing IFR (which carries with it Oxygen requirements for some local MEAs) what other strategies do you all use? Any "systems" or tricks to share, or is it pretty much just look at the sectional and make a plan? I tend to fly IFR at night so you can always fly a full approach if you are really concerned. Often the light is good enough that you can still see the mountains and other such obstacles. Study the sectional well and know where the obstacles are located and you should be find. Or just fly an approach VFR. Get flight following if you are worried about IFR traffic. You might want to read the subject before posting. Saves the embarrassment of making a completely irrelevant post. Quoting from the original post: "...However, what I worry about is my letdown to pattern altitude at the destination airport as well as departure. Short of filing IFR..." I think that I am on topic. Perhaps I shouldn't have attached my suggestion to the end of your post, but I didn't think that it mattered where I commented. -ash Cthulhu in 2005! Why wait for nature? |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ash Wyllie wrote:
Matt Whiting opined Ash Wyllie wrote: Matt Whiting opined Dan wrote: My early years of flying were spent in the Midwest where as long as you were over 2000 MSL, there were very few obstacles to hit and no terrain. Now that I have moved out West (Phoenix) I am increasingly paranoid about hitting terrain at night. Choosing a cruise altitude is easy (well above anything even close to your route). However, what I worry about is my letdown to pattern altitude at the destination airport as well as departure. Short of filing IFR (which carries with it Oxygen requirements for some local MEAs) what other strategies do you all use? Any "systems" or tricks to share, or is it pretty much just look at the sectional and make a plan? I tend to fly IFR at night so you can always fly a full approach if you are really concerned. Often the light is good enough that you can still see the mountains and other such obstacles. Study the sectional well and know where the obstacles are located and you should be find. Or just fly an approach VFR. Get flight following if you are worried about IFR traffic. You might want to read the subject before posting. Saves the embarrassment of making a completely irrelevant post. Quoting from the original post: "...However, what I worry about is my letdown to pattern altitude at the destination airport as well as departure. Short of filing IFR..." I think that I am on topic. Perhaps I shouldn't have attached my suggestion to the end of your post, but I didn't think that it mattered where I commented. It is considered good net form to reply to a message that actually has something in it relevant to your reply. And this is still not the case as even what you quoted mentions nothing about IFR traffic. Matt |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dan wrote: My early years of flying were spent in the Midwest where as long as you were over 2000 MSL, there were very few obstacles to hit and no terrain. Now that I have moved out West (Phoenix) I am increasingly paranoid about hitting terrain at night. Choosing a cruise altitude is easy (well above anything even close to your route). However, what I worry about is my letdown to pattern altitude at the destination airport as well as departure. Short of filing IFR (which carries with it Oxygen requirements for some local MEAs) what other strategies do you all use? Any "systems" or tricks to share, or is it pretty much just look at the sectional and make a plan? Descend over lit checkpoints, whether that be an airport or the neighboring city. It's that simple. I'll never descend over darkness. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Now that I have moved out West (Phoenix) I am increasingly
paranoid about hitting terrain at night. Any "systems" or tricks to share? Descend over lit checkpoints, whether that be an airport or the neighboring city. It's that simple. I'll never descend over darkness. That is good advice. However, in the military, a procedure we used, for example in approaching Albuquerque, was to hold cruise altitude until ABQ's lights came into view. Then continue for a minute or two, and then start a gradual let-down keeping ABQ's lights in the same position (the way we hold the runway end in constant position when on long final). So long as the lights are in view like that, there is nothing solid between the airplane and the lights. vince norris |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Shock cooling is probably a myth. I believe both Light Plane
Maintainence and Aviation Consumer have taken that position. It MAY be true in extreme cases for turbos. According to their research, every takeoff causes more thermal shock than any descent. As for the manufacturers, Lycoming recommends running at 50 deg rich of peak, which G. Braly's research has shown is the absolute worst place to operate, so they may or may not know what is best about shock cooling. I certainly wouldn't let a fear of shock cooling my engine cause me to make an unsafe night(or day) approach, that's for sure. It won't cost you to use a gentle descent to avoid the possibility of shock cooling, so that is how I fly, but it probably doesn't matter. Bud Timmay wrote: Dan wrote: My early years of flying were spent in the Midwest where as long as you were over 2000 MSL, there were very few obstacles to hit and no terrain. Now that I have moved out West (Phoenix) I am increasingly paranoid about hitting terrain at night. Choosing a cruise altitude is easy (well above anything even close to your route). However, what I worry about is my letdown to pattern altitude at the destination airport as well as departure. Short of filing IFR (which carries with it Oxygen requirements for some local MEAs) what other strategies do you all use? Any "systems" or tricks to share, or is it pretty much just look at the sectional and make a plan? Descend over lit checkpoints, whether that be an airport or the neighboring city. It's that simple. I'll never descend over darkness. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
FAA PPL night flight requirement - does it have to be DUAL? | Peter Clark | Piloting | 21 | January 6th 05 12:38 AM |
Garmin 430 Terrain Avoidance | endre | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | July 22nd 04 03:41 AM |
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 106 | May 12th 04 07:18 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |