![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
Interesting. I was very fortunate to spent quite a few hours in the back seat of a DG-1000 this summer and found it very comfortable - and I'm 6' 3" tall with very long legs. I think it is a lovely glider in every way! Very easy to fly and impressive performance. My longs legs get a bit cramped in the front seat on long flights though. Paul Remde "Jeremy Zawodny" wrote in message ... wrote: Same spoiler effectiveness (unless the Duo spoilers/wheelbrake are improperly adjusted, which is common). If you're not doing Acro, and you don't mind asking passenger to operate gear, no difference (I always fly from back seat). Anyway, I know some clubs are equally happy with DG-1000 as we are with our Duo ! I think DG rear seat is a tad more comfortable as well. I'll try fly the DG one of these days... Heh. I happen to think the back seat is the worst feature of the DG-1000, at least in terms of comfort. :-) But, yeah, it's worth flying both. I haven't flown a Duo X yet, but I'd like to someday. Jeremy |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You'll have seen a theme developing.... K21....K21...K21
They're still hard to beat for safety, simplicity, ruggedness and flexibilty. If only you could spin them! See below for answers (London Gliding Club) At 21:12 18 September 2006, Contestid67 wrote: My home club is in the beginning stages of research on the purchase of a new/used two place glider. Rather than focus on what you would like to own, we want to focus on what you currently do own. We would like to ask you a few questions; - What two place gliders are owned by your club? 5xK21 1xK13 (largely for spinning) 1xDuo Discus (advanced XC training) 1xMotorfalke (field landing & nav training) - What were the considerations when your purchased those gliders? Been operating them for over 20 years but we keep getting a new one as we pension one off. General all-round ability, ease of use, robustness etc. - Which glider would you purchase again? K21 (for the purpose) - Do you prefer glass or aluminum for a club ship? Why? Pros/cons? Glass. No metal gliders suitable/available. - Do you store the glider inside or outside? If inside is this in a hangar or trailer? K21s and K13 live in hangar. Duo in trailer (less hangar rash) - If in a trailer have there been any issues with assembly/disasse mblyby club members? Occasional minor issues if people not familiar. - Does the club supply parachutes? Yes - What instruments do you consider necessary beyond altimeter, ASI, compass, mech vario? All club gliders have elec/adio varios and radios. They also now have EW Microrecorder loggers (dead easy - no need for numpties to touch anything!). Our need of radios and loggers has to do with our unusual proximity to Luton Airport. We're inside the TMA and our boundaries change depending on their landing direction so we need a high degree of control and awareness. The Duo is great for XC but may unsuitable for general club training. We don't usually winch it partly because we have a limited site and people used to dropping a K21 striaght ahead on cable-break might be 'embarrassed' by the Duo flying into the next field. The Duo X is much better in respect of brakes. Haven't flown the DG1000 but it does do a lot of the things a K21 and a Duo can do in one package. Thanks in advance for your responses. - John Welcome Rob |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() True -- but you can get the same qualities for a lower price by purchasing a PW-6 -- and it spins as required. [:)) You'll have seen a theme developing.... K21....K21...K21 They're still hard to beat for safety, simplicity, ruggedness and flexibilty. If only you could spin them! |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:29:49 GMT, Charles Yeates
wrote: True -- but you can get the same qualities for a lower price by purchasing a PW-6 -- and it spins as required. [:)) Having tried to squeeze my 6'7" into a PW-6 without success I can testify that the PW-6 does not offer the same qualities as an ASK-21... Bye Andreas |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Remde wrote:
Hi, Interesting. I was very fortunate to spent quite a few hours in the back seat of a DG-1000 this summer and found it very comfortable - and I'm 6' 3" tall with very long legs. I think it is a lovely glider in every way! Very easy to fly and impressive performance. My longs legs get a bit cramped in the front seat on long flights though. Don't get me wrong. I love our DG-1000. Our club has a 2nd one on order. But I just wish the back seat was more comfortable. I've done a bit of experimenting with towels and cushions, so it's a lot better now. But there's still tweaking to be done. Jeremy |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andreas Maurer wrote:
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 15:29:49 GMT, Charles Yeates Having tried to squeeze my 6'7" into a PW-6 without success I can testify that the PW-6 does not offer the same qualities as an ASK-21... Bye Andreas Andreas, I'm 72" , five inches more than you, and still comfy in PW-5. You should try again. This time relax, don't squeeze. Bye, bye Richard |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What is Purpose of Sports Class Nationals? | Frank Paynter | Soaring | 28 | July 5th 06 09:10 PM |
TSA rule 49 CFR Part 1552 (or its misinterpretation) is already preventing people from flying (even renters) (long) | Bay Aviator | Piloting | 15 | October 21st 04 10:29 PM |
Northern NJ Flying Club Accepting New Members | Andrew Gideon | General Aviation | 0 | June 12th 04 02:14 AM |
Ultralight Club Bylaws - Warning Long Post | MrHabilis | Home Built | 0 | June 11th 04 05:07 PM |
Club Management Issue | Geoffrey Barnes | Owning | 150 | March 30th 04 06:36 PM |