![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wade Hasbrouck writes:
Service Ceiling I believe is defined as "where Vx equals Vy", which where they meet will result in a minimal to non-existent climb rate. Vx increases as altitude increases, Vy decreases as altitude increases. Also as you climb less dense air produces less lift (get to a point where there is not longer "surplus" lift to produce a climb), and less engine power to move the aircraft through the air. To climb a 172 to that altitude takes a long time... :-) which is because as you climb the wings produce less and less lift and the climb rate decreases, along with the engine not being able to produce as much power. Yup, that's what I noticed. At least it's a gradual thing, so it doesn't come as a nasty surprise. It became obvious that the aircraft didn't want to go higher, and as the slopes loomed in the window I decided to turn around and explore other areas. The scenery for KSEA and its surroundings is unusually detailed and performant, for some reason. Yesterday, I flew up to KBVS from KRNT at 4500', which I didn't reach until I was almost over KPAE, but then I had to hang out at 2500' for a bit waiting for the Center Controller to get me a squawk code and clear me through the Class B. :-) Coming home, I was telling my passenger..."The question for the trip home is 5500' or 3500'?" And she asked "Why?" I explained the VFR Altitude Rule, and then said "It takes a 'long time' to get to 5500' and then by the time you get there you pretty much have to start descending, as it is easier to avoid the Class B." Picked 3500' for the trip home, as that is sufficient to clear the Class D at KPAE (Class D at KPAE goes to 3100') Route was basically KRNT-KPAE-KBVS, KBVS-KPAE-KRNT In a sim I have the option of ignoring such things. Also, the ATC simulation is pretty limited, so if you go outside what the sim provides for, you have to pretend that ATC is talking to you, and I don't have much imagination for that. I'm trying to learn all the rules about airspace and ATC, but it's complicated. And I don't have any charts, which makes it hard to figure out where I am in terms of airspace in some cases. (You _can_ ask to transit Class B airspace in MSFS's ATC, but the clearance is always granted unconditionally, so it's not very realistic.) The GPS and other instruments do faithfully indicate changes in airspace, but I'm not very good at watching for them. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Exposed Electrical Wires in Boeing 737 Fuel Tanks! | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | July 17th 06 06:13 PM |
I want to build the most EVIL plane EVER !!! | Eliot Coweye | Home Built | 237 | February 13th 06 03:55 AM |
C-172 Fuel | [email protected] | Piloting | 23 | November 23rd 05 09:39 PM |
More long-range Spitfires and daylight Bomber Command raids, with added nationalistic abuse (was: #1 Jet of World War II) | The Revolution Will Not Be Televised | Military Aviation | 161 | September 25th 03 07:35 AM |
First flight tests of systems to mitigate fuel tank explosions | Peter Duniho | Piloting | 1 | July 16th 03 10:49 PM |