![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RandyL wrote:
I can't seem to visualize why Vx is not the best rate of climb. I think what's confusing about it is that it's always presented in terms of getting over obstacles at the end of the runway. You (as in "everyone") always think of getting over those obstacles as quickly as possible, which is why Vx seems "faster." (At least, that's the way it seemed to me.) So forget time for a second and think about it in terms of horizontal distance: Vx will get you to a higher altitude over a shorter distance than Vy. It's a steeper slope. And that's it. If you add time into the equation, it'll take you longer to reach the same altitude along Vx than Vy, but that's because you can go that much faster at Vy than at Vx. Hope that helps. Marc |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
figuring Rate of Climb | Michael Horowitz | Home Built | 1 | June 19th 05 03:16 AM |
Newbie question on Rate of Climb | Wright1902Glider | Home Built | 0 | August 17th 04 03:48 PM |
Rate of climb | Dillon Pyron | Home Built | 3 | May 8th 04 01:08 PM |
Angle of climb at Vx and glide angle when "overweight": five questions | Koopas Ly | Piloting | 16 | November 29th 03 10:01 PM |
Minimum rate of climb or descent | Aaron Kahn | Instrument Flight Rules | 3 | July 25th 03 03:22 PM |