![]() |
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Recently, Stefano posted:
Gary Drescher wrote: Oops: your turning radius is about 1200'. In occasions like these I was trained to do a chandelle. Immelman turn will also do ;-) Wow. You can do an Immelman in under 500'? Impressive! Neil |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Neil Gould" wrote Wow. You can do an Immelman in under 500'? Impressive! How about a baby hammerhead turn, with a half roll coming out of it? g -- Jim in NC |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Morgans" wrote in message
... "Neil Gould" wrote Wow. You can do an Immelman in under 500'? Impressive! How about a baby hammerhead turn, with a half roll coming out of it? g -- Jim in NC Presuming that no one is immediately on top of you, somethng akin to a duster turn works quite well and only uses about 50 feet to make a really dramatic difference in the turn radius. I used to do that to turn around a Tomohawk (PA-38) in a small radius. Peter |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Peter Dohm" wrote Presuming that no one is immediately on top of you, somethng akin to a duster turn works quite well and only uses about 50 feet to make a really dramatic difference in the turn radius. I used to do that to turn around a Tomohawk (PA-38) in a small radius. I wonder if a low time pilot like this one, at what, about 80 hours, could be taught to do this kind of turn in a Cirrus? Doubtful, I think, don't you? I didn't even think of a duster turn. Perhaps that should become a new required maneuver in the private pilot test? g Or does that go in the classification of, "Hey, y'all, watch this!" /;-o)) -- Jim in NC |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Morgans" wrote in message
... "Peter Dohm" wrote Presuming that no one is immediately on top of you, somethng akin to a duster turn works quite well and only uses about 50 feet to make a really dramatic difference in the turn radius. I used to do that to turn around a Tomohawk (PA-38) in a small radius. I wonder if a low time pilot like this one, at what, about 80 hours, could be taught to do this kind of turn in a Cirrus? Doubtful, I think, don't you? I didn't even think of a duster turn. Perhaps that should become a new required maneuver in the private pilot test? g Or does that go in the classification of, "Hey, y'all, watch this!" /;-o)) -- Jim in NC What I did wasn't a true duster turn; I didn't turn out, then greater than 180, and then reverse again. What really happened (the first time I did it) was that I probably had about 30 hours and was out in the practice area with my instructor, who believed in tight patterns, for the purpose of horsing the plane around to become accustomed to its handling characteristics. At that time, the PA-38 was pretty new to both of us. By the time that he requested that I turn the plane around over a field in the practice area, within plus or minus 50 feet of altitude, it was apparent to me (from doing 2G circles and figure 8s around pilons) that the width of that field was less than the plane's 2G turning diameter at 80 Kts. So, I throttled back, lost about 25 feet, pulled up, rolled into the bank and around the turn, leveled the wings, pulled out and brought the power back up. The maneuver used about half of the altitude tolerance--and about half the width of the field. All in all, I would not put it in the category of "Hey, y'all, watch this!" Instead, it is a precision method that allows a 1G turn with 60 a degree bank at approach speed, and a resulting tight turning radius. Like any precision work, it is a good idea to practice it first over a lot of flat countryside--as we did. Including steeper banks and some energy management manuevers in the private pilot training would probably be a good idea. I think that duster turns, as done by dusters, might be fun to watch--from the ground. g Peter (Off line 'till tomorrow evening) |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
A manuever similar to what you are describing that I like to do in the
Archer is to leave the power on, pitch up 30 degrees, and hold that until the airspeed drops to 65 knots. Then I kick full left rudder and do a flat hammer head style turn while leaving the elevator in a neutral position to unload the wings to prevent a stall. I also use just enough aileron to keep the roll angle under control. The result is that I come out 180 degrees from my original heading and level out at the same altitude that I started at. The turn radius is very tight. Dean |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Peter
What is a "duster turn"? Peter Dohm wrote: "Morgans" wrote in message ... "Neil Gould" wrote Wow. You can do an Immelman in under 500'? Impressive! How about a baby hammerhead turn, with a half roll coming out of it? g -- Jim in NC Presuming that no one is immediately on top of you, somethng akin to a duster turn works quite well and only uses about 50 feet to make a really dramatic difference in the turn radius. I used to do that to turn around a Tomohawk (PA-38) in a small radius. Peter |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Ol Shy & Bashful" wrote\ What is a "duster turn"? I'm guessing that is what he is calling a turn that you have done a "few" times, while crop dusting in fixed wings. g -- Jim in NC |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Second Helicopter Crash into the East River | Bob Chilcoat | Piloting | 2 | June 21st 05 09:50 AM |
| No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil | Ewe n0 who | Military Aviation | 1 | April 10th 04 12:25 AM |
| No US soldier should have 2 die for Israel 4 oil | Ewe n0 who | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 7th 04 08:31 PM |
| Coordinated turning stall and spins | Chris OCallaghan | Soaring | 20 | November 18th 03 09:46 PM |
| How I got to Oshkosh (long) | Doug | Owning | 2 | August 18th 03 01:05 AM |