![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andrew Sarangan" wrote in message
ups.com... [...] This is rather surprising to me because it seems that runway slope is almost irrelevant to landing distance compared to the effects of wind. As I pointed out earlier, this makes perfect sense. Landing distance is a function of deceleration and of initial kinetic energy. Slope affects deceleration in a linear way, while wind affects the kinetic energy in an exponential way. Furthermore, the net effect of the wind is doubled when comparing headwind to tailwind operations. In the example I used, for a typical light airplane, a 10 knot wind produces a landing distance that is different by a factor of two, comparing headwind to tailwind. That is, it takes twice as much distance to come to a stop landing with a tailwind than landing with a headwind. It would take a pretty significant slope indeed to increase deceleration to the point that the landing distance was cut in half. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why not to land downwind | [email protected] | Piloting | 23 | September 6th 06 03:01 PM |
Cuban Missle Crisis - Ron Knott | Greasy Rider© @invalid.com | Naval Aviation | 0 | June 2nd 05 09:14 PM |
Pilot deviations and a new FAA reality | Chip Jones | Piloting | 125 | October 15th 04 07:42 PM |
Diamond DA-40 with G-1000 pirep | C J Campbell | Instrument Flight Rules | 117 | July 22nd 04 05:40 PM |
Off topic - Landing of a B-17 | Ghost | Home Built | 2 | October 28th 03 04:35 PM |