CNN crash video as capture by USCG

Bucky writes:

The moral of this story is that aerobatics could easily be mistaken for
loss of control to the untrained eye. =)

Impact with a building is usually a pretty good criterion for
distinguishing between aerobatics and bad flying.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.

wrote in message
oups.com...
Matt Barrow wrote:

What does IQ matter to a matter of naiveté?


It's imho the only thing that matters. The reasoning of an event/action
is fundamentally reliant on whether a person has
subnormal/normal/above-normal IQ.

_Reasoning_ has little to do with IQ. _Analysis_ has everything to do with
IQ.

[irrelevant stuff snipped]

Matt Barrow writes:

_Reasoning_ has little to do with IQ. _Analysis_ has everything to do with
IQ.

Both are strongly influenced by IQ. However, acquired knowledge is
much less correlated with intelligence. Thus it is possible to be
naïve and smart, or sophisticated but not very bright.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.