A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Fatalities: Rentals vs Owned?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 22nd 06, 08:31 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Fatalities: Rentals vs Owned?

Emily writes:

Every single rental
aircraft I have flown is meticulously maintained, by certificated and
qualified mechanics with factory training.


But who knows where those aircraft have been, and how pilots have
treated them when away from the eyes of their owners? For example, an
airframe could be overstressed and not show any visible anomalies,
until it fails.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #2  
Old October 22nd 06, 08:56 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Wanttaja
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 756
Default Fatalities: Rentals vs Owned?

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:31:55 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote:

Emily writes:

Every single rental
aircraft I have flown is meticulously maintained, by certificated and
qualified mechanics with factory training.


But who knows where those aircraft have been, and how pilots have
treated them when away from the eyes of their owners? For example, an
airframe could be overstressed and not show any visible anomalies,
until it fails.


Same argument could be made for *any* airplane...you don't know what the
previous owner did to it. But there are admittedly more people who have
previously flown a renter than a used plane. To quote myself, "Renting
airplanes is like renting sex: It's harder to arrange at short notice on
Saturday, you worry about what previous customers left for you, and someone is
always looking at their watch."

Ron Wanttaja
  #3  
Old October 22nd 06, 09:27 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Fatalities: Rentals vs Owned?

Ron Wanttaja writes:

Same argument could be made for *any* airplane...you don't know what the
previous owner did to it.


If it has a previous owner ... but a brand-new plane does not.

But there are admittedly more people who have previously flown
a renter than a used plane.


If they are anything like rental cars or other rental equipment, they
may be in very sorry shape.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #4  
Old October 22nd 06, 09:48 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Wanttaja
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 756
Default Fatalities: Rentals vs Owned?

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 10:27:39 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote:

Ron Wanttaja writes:

Same argument could be made for *any* airplane...you don't know what the
previous owner did to it.


If it has a previous owner ... but a brand-new plane does not.


The average General Aviation aircraft is more than 30 years old. A new plane
requires a cash outlay an order of magnitude higher. And *no* buyer is the very
first person to fly the aircraft. Not all ferry pilots are as genteel as
NW_Pilot. :-)

But there are admittedly more people who have previously flown
a renter than a used plane.


If they are anything like rental cars or other rental equipment, they
may be in very sorry shape.


With one exception, the rental cars I've driven have been in pristine shape,
compared to the clapped-out 172s I rent every two years for my BFR. I've never
had a rental car more than a year old, haven't had a rental airplane less than
ten years old for at least the last 20 years. My last two personal cars were
bought used from the rental agencies. Both went to 100K miles with few problems
(GM cars, even).

(The rental-car exception was a Toyota rented at a location which had mostly
gravel roads. The rental agreement required that I clean any blood out of the
trunk before turning it back in....no, it wasn't New Jersey :-)

Ron Wanttaja
  #5  
Old October 22nd 06, 02:31 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Fatalities: Rentals vs Owned?

Ron Wanttaja writes:

The average General Aviation aircraft is more than 30 years old. A new plane
requires a cash outlay an order of magnitude higher. And *no* buyer is the very
first person to fly the aircraft. Not all ferry pilots are as genteel as
NW_Pilot.


I'd fix that by riding with the ferry pilot, or by picking the plane
up myself.

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
  #6  
Old October 22nd 06, 03:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Viperdoc[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 91
Default Fatalities: Rentals vs Owned?

This assumes that you are checked out in the plane, and that your insurance
company agrees. For many complex airplanes, companies might require 20-100
hours time in type, and 20 or more of dual instruction before being covered,
along with possibly an instructor sign-off. (an example is the Baron you
talk about)


  #7  
Old October 22nd 06, 07:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dave Stadt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 271
Default Fatalities: Rentals vs Owned?


"Viperdoc" wrote in message
...
This assumes that you are checked out in the plane, and that your
insurance company agrees. For many complex airplanes, companies might
require 20-100 hours time in type, and 20 or more of dual instruction
before being covered, along with possibly an instructor sign-off. (an
example is the Baron you talk about)



I don't think insurance companies require a check-out for airplanes that
come in a box and plug into the wall.


  #8  
Old October 22nd 06, 05:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Spam Magnet
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Fatalities: Rentals vs Owned?

In article ,
Mxsmanic wrote:
Ron Wanttaja writes:

The average General Aviation aircraft is more than 30 years old. A new plane
requires a cash outlay an order of magnitude higher. And *no* buyer is the very
first person to fly the aircraft. Not all ferry pilots are as genteel as
NW_Pilot.


I'd fix that by riding with the ferry pilot,


How? By pulling a chair up next to him in front of the monitor?

  #9  
Old October 22nd 06, 06:37 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Wanttaja
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 756
Default Fatalities: Rentals vs Owned?

On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 15:31:29 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote:

Ron Wanttaja writes:

The average General Aviation aircraft is more than 30 years old. A new plane
requires a cash outlay an order of magnitude higher. And *no* buyer is the very
first person to fly the aircraft. Not all ferry pilots are as genteel as
NW_Pilot.


I'd fix that by riding with the ferry pilot, or by picking the plane
up myself.


If you bought a new 172, the plane would require a special waiver to have
long-range fuel tanks installed and flown across the Atlantic to France. The
waiver wouldn't allow the ferry pilot to carry a passenger...and it would take
you a long, long time to get qualified to make the flight yourself.

And they're still not going to let you climb in at the exit point of the
assembly line and be the first person to fly the airplane....

Ron Wanttaja
  #10  
Old October 22nd 06, 07:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Fatalities: Rentals vs Owned?

Ron Wanttaja writes:

If you bought a new 172, the plane would require a special waiver to have
long-range fuel tanks installed and flown across the Atlantic to France.


Are there no ships these days?

Anyway, I'd surely not be buying one in France. And it would probably
be a Beechcraft rather than a Cessna, although I suppose the same
problem exists in any case.

The waiver wouldn't allow the ferry pilot to carry a passenger...and
it would take you a long, long time to get qualified to make the flight
yourself.


Unless, of course, I already have that qualification.

But I think it would be simpler to ship it by sea.

And they're still not going to let you climb in at the exit point of the
assembly line and be the first person to fly the airplane....


Why not?

--
Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Florida Rentals Arnold Sten Piloting 0 December 14th 04 02:13 AM
Wreckage of Privately Owned MiG-17 Found in New Mexico; Pilot Dead Rusty Barton Military Aviation 1 March 28th 04 10:51 PM
Deliberate Undercounting of "Coalition" Fatalities Jeffrey Smidt Military Aviation 1 February 10th 04 07:11 PM
Rentals in Colorado PhyrePhox Piloting 11 December 27th 03 03:45 AM
Rentals at BUR Dan Katz Piloting 0 July 19th 03 06:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.