lancair crash scapoose, OR

"Richard Riley" wrote in message
...
The Columbia does NOT have a backup gear operation system. Never has,
probably never will.

Hmmm...I thought they had released a retractable version recently. Wonder
where I got that idea.

In that case, then the rules for experimentals would apply...like I said,
I'm less familiar with those rules. It surprises me that the basic
certification standards for the amateur-built category aren't more similar
to Part 23, but if it happens that they aren't, I don't have any first-hand
knowledge that would contradict that.

Pete

"Peter Duniho" wrote in message
...
"Richard Riley" wrote in message
...
The Columbia does NOT have a backup gear operation system. Never has,
probably never will.

Hmmm...I thought they had released a retractable version recently. Wonder
where I got that idea.

In that case, then the rules for experimentals would apply...like I said,
I'm less familiar with those rules. It surprises me that the basic
certification standards for the amateur-built category aren't more similar
to Part 23, but if it happens that they aren't, I don't have any
first-hand knowledge that would contradict that.

Providing you can demonstrate compliance to the 51% rule, you can add
seatbelts, an N number, and the proper instrumentation to your barca-lounger
and get it "certified" as an experimental-amateur built. You'll have to add
a transponder, encoder, and a radio to fly it into Class B airspace. If you
deem the instrumentation adequate, you'll be able to fly it IFR as long as
you get the rating and the pitot/static/transponder passes the annual IFR
recertification test.

There are very few rules governing experimentals. This is a good thing if
you believe in self determination. Members of the "we have to be protected
against ourselves crowd" are probably not as appreciative.

KB