A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Owning
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Regs regarding "VFR flight following?" (also: "need to vent")



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 28th 06, 01:47 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 193
Default Regs regarding "VFR flight following?" (also: "need to vent")

: 12500 if we wanted. Unable, so we were vectored 20 miles out of our way.
: No I know the "correct" way to hand this would be to terminate radar
: services.
:

: The top of Charlotte approach control airspace is 10,500 MSL? That's odd,
: these things tend to be at IFR altitudes. In that situation 11,000 over
: Charlotte approach airspace would be virtually unusable.

The top was 10,000. We were at 10,500 (almost due north, so VOR-VOR was sometimes even, sometimes odd...at
that point it was slightly west). At even 10,001 feet, we wouldn't have had to call them at all, but since we did we
got a 20 mile detour as a result.

-Cory


--

************************************************** ***********************
* Cory Papenfuss, Ph.D., PPSEL-IA *
* Electrical Engineering *
* Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University *
************************************************** ***********************

  #2  
Old October 28th 06, 04:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Jay Honeck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,573
Default Regs regarding "VFR flight following?" (also: "need to vent")

The top was 10,000. We were at 10,500 (almost due north, so VOR-VOR was sometimes even, sometimes odd...at
that point it was slightly west). At even 10,001 feet, we wouldn't have had to call them at all, but since we did we
got a 20 mile detour as a result.


That's just absurd. You must've found a controller that was ****ed
about not being allowed to wear flip-flops to work...

ducking!

;-)
--
Jay Honeck
Iowa City, IA
Pathfinder N56993
www.AlexisParkInn.com
"Your Aviation Destination"

  #3  
Old October 29th 06, 01:50 AM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,374
Default Regs regarding "VFR flight following?" (also: "need to vent")

In article . com,
"Jay Honeck" wrote:

That's just absurd. You must've found a controller that was ****ed
about not being allowed to wear flip-flops to work...


hey - the guy was professionally dressed, so he must have been
acting professionally, right?

also ducking

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

  #4  
Old October 28th 06, 01:25 PM posted to rec.aviation.owning
Steven P. McNicoll[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 660
Default Regs regarding "VFR flight following?" (also: "need to vent")


wrote in message
...

The top was 10,000. We were at 10,500 (almost due north, so VOR-VOR was
sometimes even, sometimes odd...at
that point it was slightly west). At even 10,001 feet, we wouldn't have
had to call them at all, but since we did we
got a 20 mile detour as a result.


I would have reminded them that I was operating VFR in Class E airspace and
thus they had no responsibility for separation and no authority to initiate
vectors or assign an altitude.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder John Doe Piloting 145 March 31st 06 06:58 PM
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? Rick Umali Piloting 29 February 15th 06 04:40 AM
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? Ric Home Built 2 September 13th 05 09:39 PM
Real World Specs for FS 2004 Paul H. Simulators 16 August 18th 03 09:25 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.