A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Diamond DA-40



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 31st 06, 01:53 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Dylan Smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 530
Default Diamond DA-40

On 2006-10-31, Eric Bartsch wrote:
I've got quite a bit of high-perf and complex time in faster aircraft,
but I've never flown any of the Diamond planes.


I flew a DA-40 for an hour or so with one of their demonstrators back in
early 2002. I had by then a fair number of hours in the S-35 Bonanza, as
well as a few in lower performance complex planes like the Arrow.

I found the DA-40 to be entirely conventional and very pleasant to fly.
The one I flew was one of the 'conventional engined' 180hp O-360 types -
the diesel wasn't out then. It performed better than a 200hp Arrow in
every quantitative respect (speed, rate of climb, fuel burn) and in my
opinion, in every qualitative aspect too (nicer handling, better outward
visibility, easier to land, quieter, more comfortable, easier to get in
and out of since you can enter either side and there's also a back door
for rear seat passengers).

Experience in aircraft like the Grumman AA5 helps as it has a castoring
nosewheel, but that really doesn't take long to get used to.

--
Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid.
Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de
  #2  
Old October 31st 06, 05:11 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,446
Default Diamond DA-40

In article ,
Dylan Smith wrote:

Experience in aircraft like the Grumman AA5 helps as it has a castoring
nosewheel, but that really doesn't take long to get used to.


Owner-speak: expect to spend money on brakes.
  #3  
Old October 31st 06, 11:07 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Eric Bartsch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 39
Default Diamond DA-40


Thanks for all the feedback on the DA-40. Sounds like the plane is
pretty straight forward. I've got a glider rating, and I currently fly
a warbird with a center stick and a castoring nosewheel, so it sounds
like the main differences between what is "normal" are covered there.
I'll be interested to see how it flies. I've always thought they looked
like interesting planes.

I got to fly an SR-20 once and I was surprised at how little the side
stick mattered. By the time I had climbed through about 200 feet, it
seemed perfectly normal. It was definitely a plane where you would want
the trim operational at all times though.

Thanks,
Eric Bartsch
1959 Pilatus P-3 A-848
http://www.hometown.aol.com/bartscher/P3A848.html

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Diamond Distance flight plan 303SAM Soaring 6 April 4th 06 12:21 AM
Diamond Display Day & Open House - Best in Flight Aviation Academy,Morristown NJ Dave Vioreanu Owning 0 July 9th 05 01:32 AM
Diamond Display Day & Open House - Best in Flight Aviation Academy,Morristown NJ Dave Vioreanu Piloting 0 July 9th 05 01:32 AM
Thunderstorm - Ron Knott Greasy Rider© @invalid.com Naval Aviation 0 June 2nd 05 11:05 PM
Diamond DA40-180 lance smith Piloting 9 December 4th 03 04:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.