|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
August 25th 03, 04:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Wow! While I was out flying down to MMV at 139KTAS (7500' @ 30.03 and 51F)
a troll wandered by..... "Nathan Young" wrote in message om... "Satellite" wrote in message . com... Sorry for my comment, but can't hold back: How do you come up with a ridiculous price like that. Your plane is an old pile of junk. Compare it to a 1997 to 1999 Cessna 172! They are available from $75000 and up... That's a bold statement. The Cessna's you posted had runout engines, and cruise 15 kts slower than the Tiger. -Nathan 
|
|
#2
August 25th 03, 04:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
That wasn't aimed at you Nate. Bad targetting on my reply to the group
messed up the placement.... I will say I flew 172's in training, an Aerobat for spins, Extra 300L's for EMT/Aero and an SR22....the Tiger's a great handler, 182 fast on 172 fuel, and has visibility with the best I've flown. "Flynn" wrote in message news:Szf2b.250843$YN5.170675@sccrnsc01... Wow! While I was out flying down to MMV at 139KTAS (7500' @ 30.03 and 51F) a troll wandered by..... "Nathan Young" wrote in message om... "Satellite" wrote in message . com... Sorry for my comment, but can't hold back: How do you come up with a ridiculous price like that. Your plane is an old pile of junk. Compare it to a 1997 to 1999 Cessna 172! They are available from $75000 and up... That's a bold statement. The Cessna's you posted had runout engines, and cruise 15 kts slower than the Tiger. -Nathan
|
|
#3
August 25th 03, 04:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
I get it.
It's like driving an 1979 Porsche or Corvette convertible. Nice if you like old stuff. "Flynn" wrote in message news:WCf2b.251136$Ho3.33197@sccrnsc03... That wasn't aimed at you Nate. Bad targetting on my reply to the group messed up the placement.... I will say I flew 172's in training, an Aerobat for spins, Extra 300L's for EMT/Aero and an SR22....the Tiger's a great handler, 182 fast on 172 fuel, and has visibility with the best I've flown. "Flynn" wrote in message news:Szf2b.250843$YN5.170675@sccrnsc01... Wow! While I was out flying down to MMV at 139KTAS (7500' @ 30.03 and 51F) a troll wandered by..... "Nathan Young" wrote in message om... "Satellite" wrote in message . com... Sorry for my comment, but can't hold back: How do you come up with a ridiculous price like that. Your plane is an old pile of junk. Compare it to a 1997 to 1999 Cessna 172! They are available from $75000 and up... That's a bold statement. The Cessna's you posted had runout engines, and cruise 15 kts slower than the Tiger. -Nathan
|
|
#4
August 25th 03, 05:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
You aren't an A&P and I doubt you're a pilot either....what you are is
clueless. I've never met anyone with either certification that says the dumb ass stuff you've posted here. What you are is a troll. 'Nuff said "Satellite" wrote in message om... I get it. It's like driving an 1979 Porsche or Corvette convertible. Nice if you like old stuff. "Flynn" wrote in message news:WCf2b.251136$Ho3.33197@sccrnsc03... That wasn't aimed at you Nate. Bad targetting on my reply to the group messed up the placement.... I will say I flew 172's in training, an Aerobat for spins, Extra 300L's for EMT/Aero and an SR22....the Tiger's a great handler, 182 fast on 172 fuel, and has visibility with the best I've flown. "Flynn" wrote in message news:Szf2b.250843$YN5.170675@sccrnsc01... Wow! While I was out flying down to MMV at 139KTAS (7500' @ 30.03 and 51F) a troll wandered by..... "Nathan Young" wrote in message om... "Satellite" wrote in message . com... Sorry for my comment, but can't hold back: How do you come up with a ridiculous price like that. Your plane is an old pile of junk. Compare it to a 1997 to 1999 Cessna 172! They are available from $75000 and up... That's a bold statement. The Cessna's you posted had runout engines, and cruise 15 kts slower than the Tiger. -Nathan
|
|
#5
August 25th 03, 05:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
What you believe is your beer.
Stating that I am not an A&P is simply retarded - I was. You doubt that I am a pilot - I doubt that you have a brain. How can you make such statements without knowing me you stupid ****. And while you're at it - go buy the ****ing Tiger and waste your money on old junk. You got my blessings... "Flynn" wrote in message news:Ipg2b.252685$uu5.57804@sccrnsc04... You aren't an A&P and I doubt you're a pilot either....what you are is clueless. I've never met anyone with either certification that says the dumb ass stuff you've posted here. What you are is a troll. 'Nuff said "Satellite" wrote in message om... I get it. It's like driving an 1979 Porsche or Corvette convertible. Nice if you like old stuff. "Flynn" wrote in message news:WCf2b.251136$Ho3.33197@sccrnsc03... That wasn't aimed at you Nate. Bad targetting on my reply to the group messed up the placement.... I will say I flew 172's in training, an Aerobat for spins, Extra 300L's for EMT/Aero and an SR22....the Tiger's a great handler, 182 fast on 172 fuel, and has visibility with the best I've flown. "Flynn" wrote in message news:Szf2b.250843$YN5.170675@sccrnsc01... Wow! While I was out flying down to MMV at 139KTAS (7500' @ 30.03 and 51F) a troll wandered by..... "Nathan Young" wrote in message om... "Satellite" wrote in message . com... Sorry for my comment, but can't hold back: How do you come up with a ridiculous price like that. Your plane is an old pile of junk. Compare it to a 1997 to 1999 Cessna 172! They are available from $75000 and up... That's a bold statement. The Cessna's you posted had runout engines, and cruise 15 kts slower than the Tiger. -Nathan
|
|
#6
August 25th 03, 06:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sorry, I overlooked - you own the plane currently, Flynn. Well, good luck
selling it then. As stated before, you will need it. And congratulations on your new buy. I like the Cirrus design. Except the sidestick - but this would open another discussion I rather avoid here. Sat "Satellite" wrote in message m... What you believe is your beer. Stating that I am not an A&P is simply retarded - I was. You doubt that I am a pilot - I doubt that you have a brain. How can you make such statements without knowing me you stupid ****. And while you're at it - go buy the ****ing Tiger and waste your money on old junk. You got my blessings... "Flynn" wrote in message news:Ipg2b.252685$uu5.57804@sccrnsc04... You aren't an A&P and I doubt you're a pilot either....what you are is clueless. I've never met anyone with either certification that says the dumb ass stuff you've posted here. What you are is a troll. 'Nuff said "Satellite" wrote in message om... I get it. It's like driving an 1979 Porsche or Corvette convertible. Nice if you like old stuff. "Flynn" wrote in message news:WCf2b.251136$Ho3.33197@sccrnsc03... That wasn't aimed at you Nate. Bad targetting on my reply to the group messed up the placement.... I will say I flew 172's in training, an Aerobat for spins, Extra 300L's for EMT/Aero and an SR22....the Tiger's a great handler, 182 fast on 172 fuel, and has visibility with the best I've flown. "Flynn" wrote in message news:Szf2b.250843$YN5.170675@sccrnsc01... Wow! While I was out flying down to MMV at 139KTAS (7500' @ 30.03 and 51F) a troll wandered by..... "Nathan Young" wrote in message om... "Satellite" wrote in message . com... Sorry for my comment, but can't hold back: How do you come up with a ridiculous price like that. Your plane is an old pile of junk. Compare it to a 1997 to 1999 Cessna 172! They are available from $75000 and up... That's a bold statement. The Cessna's you posted had runout engines, and cruise 15 kts slower than the Tiger. -Nathan
|
|
#7
August 25th 03, 02:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Why do you guys even respond to this flame bait?
Nice plane, Flynn. It'll sell. "Satellite" wrote in message m... What you believe is your beer. Stating that I am not an A&P is simply retarded - I was. You doubt that I am a pilot - I doubt that you have a brain. How can you make such statements without knowing me you stupid ****. And while you're at it - go buy the ****ing Tiger and waste your money on old junk. You got my blessings... "Flynn" wrote in message news:Ipg2b.252685$uu5.57804@sccrnsc04... You aren't an A&P and I doubt you're a pilot either....what you are is clueless. I've never met anyone with either certification that says the dumb ass stuff you've posted here. What you are is a troll. 'Nuff said "Satellite" wrote in message om... I get it. It's like driving an 1979 Porsche or Corvette convertible. Nice if you like old stuff. "Flynn" wrote in message news:WCf2b.251136$Ho3.33197@sccrnsc03... That wasn't aimed at you Nate. Bad targetting on my reply to the group messed up the placement.... I will say I flew 172's in training, an Aerobat for spins, Extra 300L's for EMT/Aero and an SR22....the Tiger's a great handler, 182 fast on 172 fuel, and has visibility with the best I've flown. "Flynn" wrote in message news:Szf2b.250843$YN5.170675@sccrnsc01... Wow! While I was out flying down to MMV at 139KTAS (7500' @ 30.03 and 51F) a troll wandered by..... "Nathan Young" wrote in message om... "Satellite" wrote in message . com... Sorry for my comment, but can't hold back: How do you come up with a ridiculous price like that. Your plane is an old pile of junk. Compare it to a 1997 to 1999 Cessna 172! They are available from $75000 and up... That's a bold statement. The Cessna's you posted had runout engines, and cruise 15 kts slower than the Tiger. -Nathan
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
