A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 1st 06, 12:26 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
karl gruber[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 396
Default Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers

It's the same prop. Just put it on backwards.

Karl
ATP CFI

"Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea Hawk at wow way d0t com wrote in message
news:vZSdnVUBModXwfLYnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@wideopenwest .com...
"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
...
The cost of manufacturing two versions of the engine and
recertification of the design is not worth the small
advantage. Most light twins were designed and certified
over 40 years ago.


What would be all the unique parts?

Camshaft has to be different.
Crankshaft probably is drilled differently for the oil passages.
Starter.
Oil pump.
Magnetos.
Vacuum pump, I assume?
Prop, obviously.

That should be about it?

--
Geoff
The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com
remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail
When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate.



  #2  
Old December 1st 06, 12:58 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers

No, it is different as are internal engine parts and the
accessories.


"karl gruber" wrote in message
...
| It's the same prop. Just put it on backwards.
|
| Karl
| ATP CFI
|
| "Capt. Geoffrey Thorpe" The Sea Hawk at wow way d0t com
wrote in message
| news:vZSdnVUBModXwfLYnZ2dnUVZ_rKdnZ2d@wideopenwest .com...
| "Jim Macklin"
wrote in message
| ...
| The cost of manufacturing two versions of the engine
and
| recertification of the design is not worth the small
| advantage. Most light twins were designed and
certified
| over 40 years ago.
|
|
| What would be all the unique parts?
|
| Camshaft has to be different.
| Crankshaft probably is drilled differently for the oil
passages.
| Starter.
| Oil pump.
| Magnetos.
| Vacuum pump, I assume?
| Prop, obviously.
|
| That should be about it?
|
| --
| Geoff
| The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com
| remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to
reply by mail
| When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will
immigrate.
|
|
|


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers Mxsmanic Piloting 120 December 5th 06 12:49 AM
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers RomeoMike Piloting 6 December 2nd 06 01:47 AM
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers Newps Piloting 0 November 30th 06 07:40 PM
Light twins not using contra-rotating propellers Greg Farris Piloting 0 November 30th 06 07:25 PM
The light bulb Greasy Rider Military Aviation 6 March 2nd 04 12:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:49 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.