![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Michael, thought being from Australia you would have been a Jabiru
fan.so guess you have had problems with them. Phil "Michael Coates" wrote in message ... Answer = Buy the Rotax....... Joe wrote: Looking to buy either a Jabiru or Rotax 4 stroke engine. RELIABILITY is the most important factor. Seems like the Jabiru should be better with lower RPM but believe that Rotax have more engines in service and therefore more development time and hence reliability. Any comments welcomed. Phil |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
G'day Phil
Buy the Rotax! I am also in the land of the Jabiru and much prefer the Rotax. There are a number of reasons, but the Rotax is a well sorted engine with great technical backup, where as I feel that the Jabiru is still being field tested with their customers. There have been many problems with my friends who have Jabs and none with the Rotax owners. Regards Ian "Joe" wrote in message ... Thanks Michael, thought being from Australia you would have been a Jabiru fan.so guess you have had problems with them. Phil "Michael Coates" wrote in message ... Answer = Buy the Rotax....... Joe wrote: Looking to buy either a Jabiru or Rotax 4 stroke engine. RELIABILITY is the most important factor. Seems like the Jabiru should be better with lower RPM but believe that Rotax have more engines in service and therefore more development time and hence reliability. Any comments welcomed. Phil |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Ian
THat was my impression too that maybe the Jabiru was being field tested by the customers at their expense. Seems to be more enthusiasm for the Rotax. Thanks Phil "Ian Donaldson" wrote in message ... G'day Phil Buy the Rotax! I am also in the land of the Jabiru and much prefer the Rotax. There are a number of reasons, but the Rotax is a well sorted engine with great technical backup, where as I feel that the Jabiru is still being field tested with their customers. There have been many problems with my friends who have Jabs and none with the Rotax owners. Regards Ian "Joe" wrote in message ... Thanks Michael, thought being from Australia you would have been a Jabiru fan.so guess you have had problems with them. Phil "Michael Coates" wrote in message ... Answer = Buy the Rotax....... Joe wrote: Looking to buy either a Jabiru or Rotax 4 stroke engine. RELIABILITY is the most important factor. Seems like the Jabiru should be better with lower RPM but believe that Rotax have more engines in service and therefore more development time and hence reliability. Any comments welcomed. Phil |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Joe" wrote in message ... Thanks Michael, thought being from Australia you would have been a Jabiru fan.so guess you have had problems with them. I was talking to the agent for the Eurostar here in Ireland and he said that many prefere the Rotax option because it's geared it can turn a larger three bladed prop than the Jabiru. This gives better take off performance and rate of climb. It also gived the impression of better flying performance, however that I cannot comment on. Both are very nice running engines. -- .. -- Cheers, Jonathan Lowe modelflyer at antispam dot net Antispam trap in place Phil "Michael Coates" wrote in message ... Answer = Buy the Rotax....... Joe wrote: Looking to buy either a Jabiru or Rotax 4 stroke engine. RELIABILITY is the most important factor. Seems like the Jabiru should be better with lower RPM but believe that Rotax have more engines in service and therefore more development time and hence reliability. Any comments welcomed. Phil |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe, what aeroplane are you using the engine on? Although you
correctly say that the Jab runs at lower rpm, with no gearbox the prop rpm is high. You need to make sure you can turn a relatively small prop at 3300rpm to extract all the hp out of the Jab. This doesn't work on slow draggy aircraft with large frontal area. Dave "Michael Coates" wrote in message ... Answer = Buy the Rotax....... Joe wrote: Looking to buy either a Jabiru or Rotax 4 stroke engine. RELIABILITY is the most important factor. Seems like the Jabiru should be better with lower RPM but believe that Rotax have more engines in service and therefore more development time and hence reliability. Any comments welcomed. Phil |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Dave
I'm still looking for a plane and have a few types in mind. In particular I was also looking at the Zodiac XL which is supplied as standard with the Jabiru or Rotax for similar cost. Cost is not the probelm as I would rather spend say £2000 more and have the reliability.I suppose the Zodiac Xl is a cleanish aerroplane but I'm tending to go for the Roatx as no one seems to have a bad word for it. Have now heard of quite a few problems with the Jab. Thanks for your input. Phil "Dave Grosvenor" wrote in message om... Joe, what aeroplane are you using the engine on? Although you correctly say that the Jab runs at lower rpm, with no gearbox the prop rpm is high. You need to make sure you can turn a relatively small prop at 3300rpm to extract all the hp out of the Jab. This doesn't work on slow draggy aircraft with large frontal area. Dave "Michael Coates" wrote in message ... Answer = Buy the Rotax....... Joe wrote: Looking to buy either a Jabiru or Rotax 4 stroke engine. RELIABILITY is the most important factor. Seems like the Jabiru should be better with lower RPM but believe that Rotax have more engines in service and therefore more development time and hence reliability. Any comments welcomed. Phil |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 23:04:52 +0000 (UTC), "Joe"
wrote: Hi Dave I'm still looking for a plane and have a few types in mind. Cost is not the probelm as I would rather spend say £2000 more and have the reliability.I suppose the Zodiac Xl is a cleanish aerroplane but I'm tending to go for the Roatx as no one seems to have a bad word for it. Have now heard of quite a few problems with the Jab. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Chuckle If reliability is paramount, not cost... Neither Rotax or Jabiru comes close to Lycoming or Continental. There is plenty of bad mouthing to be found for Rotax, Jabiru, Continental and Lycoming..... The trick is in separating the wheat from the chaff. Barnyard BOb -- Lycoming powered RV-3 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Jonathan
Thanks for your input too. I can see the logic behind the gearbox giving more power. I suppose it was the high revving engine that worried me most but with todays technology then 5000RPM is no big deal. Phil "Model Flyer" wrote in message ... "Joe" wrote in message ... Thanks Michael, thought being from Australia you would have been a Jabiru fan.so guess you have had problems with them. I was talking to the agent for the Eurostar here in Ireland and he said that many prefere the Rotax option because it's geared it can turn a larger three bladed prop than the Jabiru. This gives better take off performance and rate of climb. It also gived the impression of better flying performance, however that I cannot comment on. Both are very nice running engines. -- . -- Cheers, Jonathan Lowe modelflyer at antispam dot net Antispam trap in place Phil "Michael Coates" wrote in message ... Answer = Buy the Rotax....... Joe wrote: Looking to buy either a Jabiru or Rotax 4 stroke engine. RELIABILITY is the most important factor. Seems like the Jabiru should be better with lower RPM but believe that Rotax have more engines in service and therefore more development time and hence reliability. Any comments welcomed. Phil |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ellison TBI and ROTAX 582 | Bill Elliott | Aerobatics | 0 | December 22nd 03 05:58 PM |
Using 100LL in a Rotax 912 Engine | Yosimite Sam | Home Built | 3 | August 16th 03 04:00 PM |
Rotax 912 Full Throttle Springs | Mark Callahan | Home Built | 0 | July 5th 03 01:31 PM |